You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cloudstack.apache.org by "kiranchavala (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2025/01/16 09:45:13 UTC
[I] Should Cloudstack consider Minops and Maxops for a vm deployment [cloudstack]
kiranchavala opened a new issue, #10199:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/10199
ISSUE TYPE
Improvement request
COMPONENT NAME
Component: Improvement
CLOUDSTACK VERSION
Cloudstack version 4.20.x
SUMMARY
Should Cloudstack consider Minops and Maxops for a vm deployment
**Steps to reproduce the issue**
The following pr introduced used_iops feature for localstorage
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/10034
1. Launch a cloudstack environment with local storage
2. Navigate to the local storage and edit the storage
3. Update the value of IOPS total to smaller value say 7
4. Create a local storage service offering and disk offering
5. Compute offering > storage > Provide Minops and Maxops
6. Disk offering > Min ops and Max ops
<img width="711" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/7f9afef9-d5f6-4ba7-b787-de954b96c44c" />
<img width="476" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0416a60b-f820-481b-86b0-4bd8b0f6eeaf" />
7. Create a vm deployment by selecting the service offering and disk offering
Actual behaviour
The vm deployment succeeds
Questions about this behaviour
Does cloudstack validate when the Assigned primary storage “Total Iops “ is less than “UsedIops” , should the vm deployement fail ?
Does cloudstack validate the service offerings and disk offerings for (Min iops , MAX iops) for a primary localstorage ?
Should we remove the option the UI in when end user selects “Storage type” as Local and “QOS type” as storage ?
Expected behaviour
The vm deployment should fail, I think it makes sense to only show the Qos (maxops, miniops ) for a managed storage (ceph, powerflex)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] Should Cloudstack consider Minops and Maxiops for a vm deployment [cloudstack]
Posted by "DaanHoogland (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
DaanHoogland closed issue #10199: Should Cloudstack consider Minops and Maxiops for a vm deployment
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/10199
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] Should Cloudstack consider Minops and Maxiops for a vm deployment [cloudstack]
Posted by "DaanHoogland (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
DaanHoogland commented on issue #10199:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/10199#issuecomment-2596011641
@kiranchavala , nice set of questions. Maybe a good chance to test the new sub-issue feature of github?
That said it feels more like a discussion item than an issue.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org