You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jira@kafka.apache.org by "Andrew (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/05/02 17:02:00 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (KAFKA-8315) Cannot pass Materialized into a join
operation
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Andrew updated KAFKA-8315:
--------------------------
Description:
The documentation says to use `Materialized` not `JoinWindows.until()` ([https://kafka.apache.org/22/javadoc/org/apache/kafka/streams/kstream/JoinWindows.html#until-long-]), but there is no where to pass a `Materialized` instance to the join operation, only to the group operation is supported it seems.
Slack conversation here : [https://confluentcommunity.slack.com/archives/C48AHTCUQ/p1556799561287300
]
[Additional]
From what I understand, the retention period should be independent of the grace period, so I think this is more than a documentation fix (see comments below)
was:
The documentation says to use `Materialized` not `JoinWindows.until()` (https://kafka.apache.org/22/javadoc/org/apache/kafka/streams/kstream/JoinWindows.html#until-long-), but there is no where to pass a `Materialized` instance to the join operation, only to the group operation is supported it seems.
Slack conversation here : https://confluentcommunity.slack.com/archives/C48AHTCUQ/p1556799561287300
> Cannot pass Materialized into a join operation
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-8315
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8315
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Andrew
> Assignee: John Roesler
> Priority: Major
>
> The documentation says to use `Materialized` not `JoinWindows.until()` ([https://kafka.apache.org/22/javadoc/org/apache/kafka/streams/kstream/JoinWindows.html#until-long-]), but there is no where to pass a `Materialized` instance to the join operation, only to the group operation is supported it seems.
>
> Slack conversation here : [https://confluentcommunity.slack.com/archives/C48AHTCUQ/p1556799561287300
> ]
> [Additional]
> From what I understand, the retention period should be independent of the grace period, so I think this is more than a documentation fix (see comments below)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)