You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to c-dev@xerces.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2002/05/08 20:59:20 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8899] - Missing implementation of Op::Op(const Op&) causes Intel C++ Win32 link to fail

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8899>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8899

Missing implementation of Op::Op(const Op&) causes Intel C++ Win32 link to fail

zhangpy@hotmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED



------- Additional Comments From zhangpy@hotmail.com  2002-05-08 18:59 -------
Curt,

   Though the Intel C++ 6.0 complains the copy ctor only, I've checked in your 
patch for both copy ctor and operator=, please confirm if Intel 5.0 complains 
about the operator=, if not, we'd better remove it, thanks.


Rgds,
PeiYong

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-c-dev-help@xml.apache.org