You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> on 2016/02/15 10:02:53 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 4)
Hi all,
I submit Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating release to your vote (take 4, new
tentative fixing NOTICE file).
A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with +1s.
Vote thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201602.mbox/%3C56B8CCFE.5080307%40nanthrax.net%3E
Result thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201602.mbox/%3C56C04F04.3010806%40nanthrax.net%3E
The src distributions are located:
*
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheunomi-1004/org/apache/unomi/unomi/1.0.0-incubating/unomi-1.0.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
*
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheunomi-1004/org/apache/unomi/unomi/1.0.0-incubating/unomi-1.0.0-incubating-src.zip
The vote is open for 72 hours:
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Thanks,
Regards
JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 4)
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On 02/15/2016 10:02 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I submit Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating release to your vote (take 4, new
> tentative fixing NOTICE file).
>
> A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with +1s.
>
> Vote thread:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201602.mbox/%3C56B8CCFE.5080307%40nanthrax.net%3E
>
> Result thread:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201602.mbox/%3C56C04F04.3010806%40nanthrax.net%3E
>
>
> The src distributions are located:
> *
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheunomi-1004/org/apache/unomi/unomi/1.0.0-incubating/unomi-1.0.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
>
> *
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheunomi-1004/org/apache/unomi/unomi/1.0.0-incubating/unomi-1.0.0-incubating-src.zip
>
>
> The vote is open for 72 hours:
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Thanks,
> Regards
> JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 4)
Posted by Serge Huber <sh...@jahia.com>.
> On 16 févr. 2016, at 07:10, Justin Mclean <ju...@me.com> wrote:
>
> I got this error when compiling - looks like a path may be wrong:
> [INFO] Apache Unomi :: Distribution Package ............... FAILURE [ 0.568 s]
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-antrun-plugin:1.7:run (copy-karaf) on project unomi: An Ant BuildException has occured: /Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheUnomi/unomi-1.0.0-incubating/package/target/assembly/elasticsearch-1.6.2/lib/sigar does not exist.
>
> Everything else compiled fine it just looks like creating the distribution package failed, I’m assuming this is not a big issue.
>
> I think the path should be??
> ./unomi-1.0.0-incubating/package/target/assembly/lib/sigar/
Hello Justin,
I’m having trouble reproducing this from the TAR.GZ and ZIP source packages. I tested both on my Mac and a Windows machine and couldn’t reproduce this problem. Did you use the links that JB sent out or others ?
cheers,
Serge…
The src distributions are located:
* https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheunomi-1004/org/apache/unomi/unomi/1.0.0-incubating/unomi-1.0.0-incubating-src.tar.gz <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheunomi-1004/org/apache/unomi/unomi/1.0.0-incubating/unomi-1.0.0-incubating-src.tar.gz>
* https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheunomi-1004/org/apache/unomi/unomi/1.0.0-incubating/unomi-1.0.0-incubating-src.zip <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheunomi-1004/org/apache/unomi/unomi/1.0.0-incubating/unomi-1.0.0-incubating-src.zip>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 4)
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> Normally we should only have dual licensed GPL/CDDL unless I have missed something.
Note that most of the GPL/CDDL dual licensed files have this:
If you wish your version of this file to be governed by only the CDDL or
only the GPL Version 2, indicate your decision by adding "[Contributor]
elects to include this software in this distribution under the [CDDL or GPL
Version 2] license." If you don't indicate a single choice of license, a
recipient has the option to distribute your version of this file under
either the CDDL, the GPL Version 2 or to extend the choice of license to
its licensees as provided above.
So putting the text of the GPL license in LICENSE may not be a good idea.
The one that concerns me (but there may be others) is this [1] which is found in [2]. You may want to talk to Karaf about it. Karaf’s notice file does contain a reference to it and says it’s Apache licensed [3] but it license file has it under another permissive license [4] It may be that at some point the license terms fro the software have changed but I don’t know what version is included in that jar. It looks like the pom.xml doesn’t specify a version? [5]
Thanks,
Justin
1. http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/doc/english/licenseOverview.html
2. ./unomi-1.0.0-incubating/system/org/apache/karaf/wrapper/org.apache.karaf.wrapper.core/3.0.2/org.apache.karaf.wrapper.core-3.0.2.jar
3. https://github.com/apache/karaf/blob/master/NOTICE
4. https://github.com/apache/karaf/blob/master/LICENSE
5. http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/karaf/wrapper/org.apache.karaf.wrapper.core/3.0.2/org.apache.karaf.wrapper.core-3.0.2.pom
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 4)
Posted by Serge Huber <sh...@jahia.com>.
Hi Justin,
Thank you so much for this detailed testing and report.
Normally we should only have dual licensed GPL/CDDL unless I have missed something. We are working on a plugin legal-maven-plugin that actually does recursively go down into embedded JARs to make sure we collect everything but it’s a work in progress.
Honestly I would have never thought this process was so complex nor so long, and I truly wonder how many projects at Apache actually go through all of this (my guess is not many apart from yours of course :)).
That compilation issue is strange, I tested this many times locally so maybe something is depending on the environment.
cheers,
Serge…
> On 16 févr. 2016, at 07:54, Justin Mclean <ju...@me.com> wrote:
>
> HI,
>
>> thanks for this awesome review !
>
> No problem, binaries with than many jars are hard to get right. Hopefully none of the jars with jars inside than have more jars inside them :-)
>
> I did’t take a huge amount of care so made of made a mistake or two - just trying to find the obvious issues. I think some of the GPL stuff I pointed out may actually be GPL/CDDL dual licensed (which is OK in a binary) but always good to double check.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 4)
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@me.com>.
HI,
> thanks for this awesome review !
No problem, binaries with than many jars are hard to get right. Hopefully none of the jars with jars inside than have more jars inside them :-)
I did’t take a huge amount of care so made of made a mistake or two - just trying to find the obvious issues. I think some of the GPL stuff I pointed out may actually be GPL/CDDL dual licensed (which is OK in a binary) but always good to double check.
Thanks,
Justin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 4)
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi Justin,
thanks for this awesome review !
We gonna improve with your comments.
Thanks again,
Regards
JB
On 02/16/2016 07:10 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding
>
> I checked:
> - incubating in file name
> - hashes and signatures good
> - DISCLAIMER exits
> - Source LICENSE good (although the short form of the license is prefered) [1]
> - Source NOICE has a little bit of extra info in it - there's no need to mention MIT software [1]
> - No unexpected binary files in source release
> - All source files have Apache headers
> - Unable to compile from source
>
> I got this error when compiling - looks like a path may be wrong:
> [INFO] Apache Unomi :: Distribution Package ............... FAILURE [ 0.568 s]
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-antrun-plugin:1.7:run (copy-karaf) on project unomi: An Ant BuildException has occured: /Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheUnomi/unomi-1.0.0-incubating/package/target/assembly/elasticsearch-1.6.2/lib/sigar does not exist.
>
> Everything else compiled fine it just looks like creating the distribution package failed, I’m assuming this is not a big issue.
>
> I think the path should be??
> ./unomi-1.0.0-incubating/package/target/assembly/lib/sigar/
>
> You may want to fix header on this file [2].
>
> Also can you please place the binaries in the correct place, this was raised as an issue for the last release candidate.
>
> Now for the binary convenience release, sorry this is long, but I think a bit more work need to be done here.
>
> The LICENSE file:
> - Boiler place Apache license should be at the top often file
> - Please use short form of the licenses
> - It not clear what is licensed under the CDDL or GPL licenses
> - GPLv2 is considered a category X license and should not be bundled with Apache software. Why is this here?
> - Is missing a large number of licences that require being put in LICENSE
>
> For what I could find GPL software bundled includes woodstock [4], code model [5] and tanuki software java service wrapper [12] . Is there other bundled GPL software? Is the GPL issue known about and is the intent to replace that software? If this wasn’t know you may want to discuss and consider only releasing the source release.
>
> License should contain:
> - non ASF licensed software including bndlib, Jackson core, jackson databind, Jackson annotations, Fast Infoset Standard for Binary XML, ehcache, jettison, elastic search, jansi, sigar (was GPL may need to double check), jledit, Joda-Time, Fast Infoset Project, OpenWS, several ops4j projects, osgi jmx, slf4j, spring framework, SnakeYAML, Spatial4j, Quality Check, UAdetector, GeoIP2, Google HTTP Client Library For Java, MaxMind DB, mvel2
> - CPL license wsdl4j
> - CDDL JAXB Binding Compiler, JAXB Runtime module
> - dual license CDDL/GPL code model, sun el [6], stack commons, Java mail [7], SOAP with Attachments API for Java [8], TXW2 Runtime [9], XSOM,
> - BSD licensed Jline, Stax2, knopflerfish, ASM, RelaxngDatatype, StringTemplate 4
> - public domain AOP Alliance, SAX
> - EPL Eclipses’s aether, eclipse core runtime, equinox, java development tools core
> - EPL/Apache dual licensed Jetty (may actually be a mix of CDDL, EPL and GPL)
> - dual licensed(?) EPL/Apache hawtjni
> - MIT licensed RELAX NG Object Model / Parser
> - MPL licensed Rhino, juniversalchardet
> - W3C dom
> - licenses from Sigar notice file
> - Apache 1.1 license Apache Avalon , Apache Xalan
> - double check what included from Apache CXF [13]
> - double check what’s included from Apache Felix (no LICENSE/NOTICE in github mirror)
> - include what is in Apache Karaf license file (if bundled)
> - MPL license software form Apache Servicemix notice file
> - double check what’s been bundled from Apache Xerces (no LICENSE/NOTICE in github mirror)
>
> The the dual license CDDL/GPL can be treated as GPL if you don’t specify the license choice. (see links below) You probably need to put this in the NOTICE file.
>
> Sigar's license may be an issue as while it’s Apache licensed it also includes further restrictions [11]
> "You acknowledge that Software is not designed, licensed or intended for use in
> the design, construction, operation or maintenance of any nuclear facility
> ("High Risk Activities"). “
>
> I did this fairly quickly and will have missed a few things, you just need to look at the jars you are including and what is inside them. I notice some bundled jars also
> contain jars so you’ll need to look in those as well. I may of got the versions wrong and different versions could be licensed under different licenses.
>
> The NOTICE file:
> - No need to list MIT or BSD or Apace licensed in NOTICE
> - No need to include everything from the sigar NOTICE probably only the copyright line is needed but not 100% sure
> - No need to list copyright for org.apache.karaf.management, org.apache.openwebbeans, HttpCore, org.apache.sshd, org.apache.servicemix.bundles, commons-lang, org.apache.karaf.features, org.apache.mina, org.apache.karaf.kar, org.apache.karaf.jaas, org.apache.karaf.bundle, org.apache.karaf.deployer, org.apache.aries etc etc etc
> - No need for extra "This product includes software developed by the ASF”
> - Any non ASF Apache license software copyright should be in LICENSE not NOTICE
> - Notice for opensaml looks incorrect [3]?
> - Even with the amount of bundled software here I expect the NOTICE file to be closer to 100 lines rather than the 1000 lines it is
>
> Notice files I saw that IMO may effect NOTICE include:
> Apache Santuario, Jetty, Sigar, Apache Avalon, Apache Commons Codec, Apache Felix, Apache Geronimo, Apache Karaf, Apache Neethi, Apache Xalan, Apache Xerces
>
> Also note the dual CDDL/GPL license info mention above.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
>
> 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps <http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps>
> 2. ./samples/tweet-button-plugin/src/main/resources/OSGI-INF/blueprint/blueprint.xml
> 3. https://github.com/OpenConext/spring-security-opensaml/blob/master/NOTICE.TXT <https://github.com/OpenConext/spring-security-opensaml/blob/master/NOTICE.TXT>
> 4. http://central.maven.org/maven2/com/ctc/wstx/woodstox-osgi/3.2.1.1/woodstox-osgi-3.2.1.1.pom <http://central.maven.org/maven2/com/ctc/wstx/woodstox-osgi/3.2.1.1/woodstox-osgi-3.2.1.1.pom>
> 5. http://central.maven.org/maven2/com/sun/codemodel/codemodel-project/2.6/codemodel-project-2.6.pom <http://central.maven.org/maven2/com/sun/codemodel/codemodel-project/2.6/codemodel-project-2.6.pom>
> 6. https://java.net/projects/el-spec/sources/source-code/content/trunk/pom.xml?rev=285 <https://java.net/projects/el-spec/sources/source-code/content/trunk/pom.xml?rev=285> (Notice this would effect the NOTICE file)
> 7. http://central.maven.org/maven2/com/sun/mail/all/1.5.2/all-1.5.2.pom <http://central.maven.org/maven2/com/sun/mail/all/1.5.2/all-1.5.2.pom> (would also effect notice)
> 8. http://central.maven.org/maven2/com/sun/xml/messaging/saaj/saaj-impl/1.3.15/saaj-impl-1.3.15.pom <http://central.maven.org/maven2/com/sun/xml/messaging/saaj/saaj-impl/1.3.15/saaj-impl-1.3.15.pom> (same here)
> 9 .http://central.maven.org/maven2/com/sun/xml/txw2/txw2/20110809/txw2-20110809.pom <http://central.maven.org/maven2/com/sun/xml/txw2/txw2/20110809/txw2-20110809.pom> (same here)
> 10 https://github.com/fusesource/hawtjni/blob/master/license.txt <https://github.com/fusesource/hawtjni/blob/master/license.txt>
> 11. https://github.com/hyperic/sigar/blob/master/NOTICE <https://github.com/hyperic/sigar/blob/master/NOTICE>
> 12. https://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/doc/english/licenseOverview.html <https://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/doc/english/licenseOverview.html>
> 13. http://cxf.apache.org/docs/licenses.html <http://cxf.apache.org/docs/licenses.html>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 4)
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@me.com>.
Hi,
+1 binding
I checked:
- incubating in file name
- hashes and signatures good
- DISCLAIMER exits
- Source LICENSE good (although the short form of the license is prefered) [1]
- Source NOICE has a little bit of extra info in it - there's no need to mention MIT software [1]
- No unexpected binary files in source release
- All source files have Apache headers
- Unable to compile from source
I got this error when compiling - looks like a path may be wrong:
[INFO] Apache Unomi :: Distribution Package ............... FAILURE [ 0.568 s]
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-antrun-plugin:1.7:run (copy-karaf) on project unomi: An Ant BuildException has occured: /Users/justinmclean/Downloads/ApacheUnomi/unomi-1.0.0-incubating/package/target/assembly/elasticsearch-1.6.2/lib/sigar does not exist.
Everything else compiled fine it just looks like creating the distribution package failed, I’m assuming this is not a big issue.
I think the path should be??
./unomi-1.0.0-incubating/package/target/assembly/lib/sigar/
You may want to fix header on this file [2].
Also can you please place the binaries in the correct place, this was raised as an issue for the last release candidate.
Now for the binary convenience release, sorry this is long, but I think a bit more work need to be done here.
The LICENSE file:
- Boiler place Apache license should be at the top often file
- Please use short form of the licenses
- It not clear what is licensed under the CDDL or GPL licenses
- GPLv2 is considered a category X license and should not be bundled with Apache software. Why is this here?
- Is missing a large number of licences that require being put in LICENSE
For what I could find GPL software bundled includes woodstock [4], code model [5] and tanuki software java service wrapper [12] . Is there other bundled GPL software? Is the GPL issue known about and is the intent to replace that software? If this wasn’t know you may want to discuss and consider only releasing the source release.
License should contain:
- non ASF licensed software including bndlib, Jackson core, jackson databind, Jackson annotations, Fast Infoset Standard for Binary XML, ehcache, jettison, elastic search, jansi, sigar (was GPL may need to double check), jledit, Joda-Time, Fast Infoset Project, OpenWS, several ops4j projects, osgi jmx, slf4j, spring framework, SnakeYAML, Spatial4j, Quality Check, UAdetector, GeoIP2, Google HTTP Client Library For Java, MaxMind DB, mvel2
- CPL license wsdl4j
- CDDL JAXB Binding Compiler, JAXB Runtime module
- dual license CDDL/GPL code model, sun el [6], stack commons, Java mail [7], SOAP with Attachments API for Java [8], TXW2 Runtime [9], XSOM,
- BSD licensed Jline, Stax2, knopflerfish, ASM, RelaxngDatatype, StringTemplate 4
- public domain AOP Alliance, SAX
- EPL Eclipses’s aether, eclipse core runtime, equinox, java development tools core
- EPL/Apache dual licensed Jetty (may actually be a mix of CDDL, EPL and GPL)
- dual licensed(?) EPL/Apache hawtjni
- MIT licensed RELAX NG Object Model / Parser
- MPL licensed Rhino, juniversalchardet
- W3C dom
- licenses from Sigar notice file
- Apache 1.1 license Apache Avalon , Apache Xalan
- double check what included from Apache CXF [13]
- double check what’s included from Apache Felix (no LICENSE/NOTICE in github mirror)
- include what is in Apache Karaf license file (if bundled)
- MPL license software form Apache Servicemix notice file
- double check what’s been bundled from Apache Xerces (no LICENSE/NOTICE in github mirror)
The the dual license CDDL/GPL can be treated as GPL if you don’t specify the license choice. (see links below) You probably need to put this in the NOTICE file.
Sigar's license may be an issue as while it’s Apache licensed it also includes further restrictions [11]
"You acknowledge that Software is not designed, licensed or intended for use in
the design, construction, operation or maintenance of any nuclear facility
("High Risk Activities"). “
I did this fairly quickly and will have missed a few things, you just need to look at the jars you are including and what is inside them. I notice some bundled jars also
contain jars so you’ll need to look in those as well. I may of got the versions wrong and different versions could be licensed under different licenses.
The NOTICE file:
- No need to list MIT or BSD or Apace licensed in NOTICE
- No need to include everything from the sigar NOTICE probably only the copyright line is needed but not 100% sure
- No need to list copyright for org.apache.karaf.management, org.apache.openwebbeans, HttpCore, org.apache.sshd, org.apache.servicemix.bundles, commons-lang, org.apache.karaf.features, org.apache.mina, org.apache.karaf.kar, org.apache.karaf.jaas, org.apache.karaf.bundle, org.apache.karaf.deployer, org.apache.aries etc etc etc
- No need for extra "This product includes software developed by the ASF”
- Any non ASF Apache license software copyright should be in LICENSE not NOTICE
- Notice for opensaml looks incorrect [3]?
- Even with the amount of bundled software here I expect the NOTICE file to be closer to 100 lines rather than the 1000 lines it is
Notice files I saw that IMO may effect NOTICE include:
Apache Santuario, Jetty, Sigar, Apache Avalon, Apache Commons Codec, Apache Felix, Apache Geronimo, Apache Karaf, Apache Neethi, Apache Xalan, Apache Xerces
Also note the dual CDDL/GPL license info mention above.
Thanks,
Justin
1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps <http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps>
2. ./samples/tweet-button-plugin/src/main/resources/OSGI-INF/blueprint/blueprint.xml
3. https://github.com/OpenConext/spring-security-opensaml/blob/master/NOTICE.TXT <https://github.com/OpenConext/spring-security-opensaml/blob/master/NOTICE.TXT>
4. http://central.maven.org/maven2/com/ctc/wstx/woodstox-osgi/3.2.1.1/woodstox-osgi-3.2.1.1.pom <http://central.maven.org/maven2/com/ctc/wstx/woodstox-osgi/3.2.1.1/woodstox-osgi-3.2.1.1.pom>
5. http://central.maven.org/maven2/com/sun/codemodel/codemodel-project/2.6/codemodel-project-2.6.pom <http://central.maven.org/maven2/com/sun/codemodel/codemodel-project/2.6/codemodel-project-2.6.pom>
6. https://java.net/projects/el-spec/sources/source-code/content/trunk/pom.xml?rev=285 <https://java.net/projects/el-spec/sources/source-code/content/trunk/pom.xml?rev=285> (Notice this would effect the NOTICE file)
7. http://central.maven.org/maven2/com/sun/mail/all/1.5.2/all-1.5.2.pom <http://central.maven.org/maven2/com/sun/mail/all/1.5.2/all-1.5.2.pom> (would also effect notice)
8. http://central.maven.org/maven2/com/sun/xml/messaging/saaj/saaj-impl/1.3.15/saaj-impl-1.3.15.pom <http://central.maven.org/maven2/com/sun/xml/messaging/saaj/saaj-impl/1.3.15/saaj-impl-1.3.15.pom> (same here)
9 .http://central.maven.org/maven2/com/sun/xml/txw2/txw2/20110809/txw2-20110809.pom <http://central.maven.org/maven2/com/sun/xml/txw2/txw2/20110809/txw2-20110809.pom> (same here)
10 https://github.com/fusesource/hawtjni/blob/master/license.txt <https://github.com/fusesource/hawtjni/blob/master/license.txt>
11. https://github.com/hyperic/sigar/blob/master/NOTICE <https://github.com/hyperic/sigar/blob/master/NOTICE>
12. https://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/doc/english/licenseOverview.html <https://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/doc/english/licenseOverview.html>
13. http://cxf.apache.org/docs/licenses.html <http://cxf.apache.org/docs/licenses.html>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 4)
Posted by Tom Barber <ma...@apache.org>.
No problem sweet cheeks....
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:
> Awesome, thanks Tom !
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 03/04/2016 10:42 AM, Tom Barber wrote:
>
>> +1 Binding
>>
>> Checked and built. Headers look good. License, Notice and Disclaimer look
>> good.
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Gently reminder: we need at lest one more IPMC vote to accept the release.
>>>
>>> Thanks !
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 02/15/2016 10:02 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I submit Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating release to your vote (take 4, new
>>>> tentative fixing NOTICE file).
>>>>
>>>> A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with +1s.
>>>>
>>>> Vote thread:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201602.mbox/%3C56B8CCFE.5080307%40nanthrax.net%3E
>>>>
>>>> Result thread:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201602.mbox/%3C56C04F04.3010806%40nanthrax.net%3E
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The src distributions are located:
>>>> *
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheunomi-1004/org/apache/unomi/unomi/1.0.0-incubating/unomi-1.0.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
>>>>
>>>> *
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheunomi-1004/org/apache/unomi/unomi/1.0.0-incubating/unomi-1.0.0-incubating-src.zip
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The vote is open for 72 hours:
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Regards
>>>> JB
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> jbonofre@apache.org
>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 4)
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Awesome, thanks Tom !
Regards
JB
On 03/04/2016 10:42 AM, Tom Barber wrote:
> +1 Binding
>
> Checked and built. Headers look good. License, Notice and Disclaimer look
> good.
>
> Tom
>
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Gently reminder: we need at lest one more IPMC vote to accept the release.
>>
>> Thanks !
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On 02/15/2016 10:02 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I submit Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating release to your vote (take 4, new
>>> tentative fixing NOTICE file).
>>>
>>> A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with +1s.
>>>
>>> Vote thread:
>>>
>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201602.mbox/%3C56B8CCFE.5080307%40nanthrax.net%3E
>>>
>>> Result thread:
>>>
>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201602.mbox/%3C56C04F04.3010806%40nanthrax.net%3E
>>>
>>>
>>> The src distributions are located:
>>> *
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheunomi-1004/org/apache/unomi/unomi/1.0.0-incubating/unomi-1.0.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
>>>
>>> *
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheunomi-1004/org/apache/unomi/unomi/1.0.0-incubating/unomi-1.0.0-incubating-src.zip
>>>
>>>
>>> The vote is open for 72 hours:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 4)
Posted by Tom Barber <ma...@apache.org>.
+1 Binding
Checked and built. Headers look good. License, Notice and Disclaimer look
good.
Tom
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
wrote:
> Gently reminder: we need at lest one more IPMC vote to accept the release.
>
> Thanks !
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 02/15/2016 10:02 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I submit Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating release to your vote (take 4, new
>> tentative fixing NOTICE file).
>>
>> A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with +1s.
>>
>> Vote thread:
>>
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201602.mbox/%3C56B8CCFE.5080307%40nanthrax.net%3E
>>
>> Result thread:
>>
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201602.mbox/%3C56C04F04.3010806%40nanthrax.net%3E
>>
>>
>> The src distributions are located:
>> *
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheunomi-1004/org/apache/unomi/unomi/1.0.0-incubating/unomi-1.0.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
>>
>> *
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheunomi-1004/org/apache/unomi/unomi/1.0.0-incubating/unomi-1.0.0-incubating-src.zip
>>
>>
>> The vote is open for 72 hours:
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 4)
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Gently reminder: we need at lest one more IPMC vote to accept the release.
Thanks !
Regards
JB
On 02/15/2016 10:02 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I submit Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating release to your vote (take 4, new
> tentative fixing NOTICE file).
>
> A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with +1s.
>
> Vote thread:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201602.mbox/%3C56B8CCFE.5080307%40nanthrax.net%3E
>
> Result thread:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201602.mbox/%3C56C04F04.3010806%40nanthrax.net%3E
>
>
> The src distributions are located:
> *
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheunomi-1004/org/apache/unomi/unomi/1.0.0-incubating/unomi-1.0.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
>
> *
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheunomi-1004/org/apache/unomi/unomi/1.0.0-incubating/unomi-1.0.0-incubating-src.zip
>
>
> The vote is open for 72 hours:
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Thanks,
> Regards
> JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating (take 4)
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi all,
this vote passed with the following result:
+1 (binding):
Justin Mclean
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Tom Barber
No -1s.
I will complete the release process.
Thanks for your vote.
Regards
JB
On 02/15/2016 10:02 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I submit Apache Unomi 1.0.0-incubating release to your vote (take 4, new
> tentative fixing NOTICE file).
>
> A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with +1s.
>
> Vote thread:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201602.mbox/%3C56B8CCFE.5080307%40nanthrax.net%3E
>
> Result thread:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-unomi-dev/201602.mbox/%3C56C04F04.3010806%40nanthrax.net%3E
>
>
> The src distributions are located:
> *
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheunomi-1004/org/apache/unomi/unomi/1.0.0-incubating/unomi-1.0.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
>
> *
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheunomi-1004/org/apache/unomi/unomi/1.0.0-incubating/unomi-1.0.0-incubating-src.zip
>
>
> The vote is open for 72 hours:
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Thanks,
> Regards
> JB
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org