You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to java-dev@axis.apache.org by R J Scheuerle Jr <sc...@us.ibm.com> on 2001/12/31 15:20:58 UTC
Re: Proposed change to the DeserializerFactory interface (typo)
I meant to say....
Does anyone object to splitting all of the
serializers/deserializers/factories into separate
<typo fix>
classes.
</typo fix>
This would allow Axis to more easily comply with JAX-RPC and would make the
functionality easier to understand/extend.
For example, BeanSerializer would be split into BeanSerializer,
BeanDeserializer, BeanSerializerFactory, BeanDeserializerFactory...
(I would like to get some comments before actually doing this work...)
Rich Scheuerle
XML & Web Services Development
512-838-5115 (IBM TL 678-5115)
R J Scheuerle
Jr/Austin/IBM@ To: axis-dev@xml.apache.org
IBMUS cc: axis-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: Proposed change to the DeserializerFactory
12/31/2001 interface
08:03 AM
Please respond
to axis-dev
This sounds like a good change to me.
------------------------
p.s.
Does anyone object to splitting all of the
serializers/deserializers/factories into separate methods.
This would allow Axis to more easily comply with JAX-RPC and would make the
functionality easier to understand/extend.
For example, BeanSerializer would be split into BeanSerializer,
BeanDeserializer, BeanSerializerFactory, BeanDeserializerFactory...
(I would like to get some comments before actually doing this work...)
Rich Scheuerle
XML & Web Services Development
512-838-5115 (IBM TL 678-5115)