You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@qpid.apache.org by Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com> on 2022/03/15 17:33:48 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache Qpid Proton 0.37.0 (RC2)
Hi folks,
I have put together another spin for a Qpid Proton 0.37.0 release,
please give it a test out and vote accordingly.
The files can be grabbed from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.37.0-rc2/
The JIRAs assigned are:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12313720&version=12350731
It is tagged as 0.37.0-rc2.
Regards,
Robbie
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Qpid Proton 0.37.0 (RC2)
Posted by Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>.
+1
I checked things out as follows:
- Verified the signature + checksum files.
- Checked for LICENCE and NOTICE files present in the archive.
- Ran the build + tests and installed.
- Built Qpid Dispatch 1.19.x against it and ran the tests.
- Ran Qpid JMS 1.5.0 HelloWorld example against the built router.
Robbie
On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 at 17:33, Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I have put together another spin for a Qpid Proton 0.37.0 release,
> please give it a test out and vote accordingly.
>
> The files can be grabbed from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.37.0-rc2/
>
> The JIRAs assigned are:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12313720&version=12350731
>
> It is tagged as 0.37.0-rc2.
>
> Regards,
> Robbie
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Qpid Proton 0.37.0 (RC2)
Posted by Roddie Kieley <rk...@apache.org>.
Similar, but not complaining about Too many open files in the last part, instead it's complaining about subprocesses that are still running
[rkieley@z820 4]$ ctest -VV -R c-fdlimit-tests --repeat-until-fail 10
UpdateCTestConfiguration from :/wip/builds/github.com/apache/qpid-proton/0.37.0-rc2/4/DartConfiguration.tcl
Parse Config file:/wip/builds/github.com/apache/qpid-proton/0.37.0-rc2/4/DartConfiguration.tcl
UpdateCTestConfiguration from :/wip/builds/github.com/apache/qpid-proton/0.37.0-rc2/4/DartConfiguration.tcl
Parse Config file:/wip/builds/github.com/apache/qpid-proton/0.37.0-rc2/4/DartConfiguration.tcl
Test project /wip/builds/github.com/apache/qpid-proton/0.37.0-rc2/4
Constructing a list of tests
Done constructing a list of tests
Updating test list for fixtures
Added 0 tests to meet fixture requirements
Checking test dependency graph...
Checking test dependency graph end
test 6
Start 6: c-fdlimit-tests
6: Test command: /usr/bin/python3.10 "/wip/src/github.com/apache/qpid-proton/scripts/env.py" "--" "PATH=/wip/builds/github.com/apache/qpid-proton/0.37.0-rc2/4/c/examples:/home/rkieley/.local/bin:/home/rkieley/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin" "PYTHO
NPATH=/wip/src/github.com/apache/qpid-proton/tests/py" "TEST_EXE_PREFIX=/usr/bin/valgrind --tool=memcheck --leak-check=full --error-exitcode=42 --quiet --suppressions=/wip/src/github.com/apache/qpid-proton/tests/valgrind.supp" "TEST_EXE_PREFIX=" "/usr/bin/python3.10" "/
wip/src/github.com/apache/qpid-proton/c/tests/fdlimit.py"
6: Test timeout computed to be: 1500
6: F/usr/lib64/python3.10/subprocess.py:1067: ResourceWarning: subprocess 59241 is still running
6: _warn("subprocess %s is still running" % self.pid,
6: ResourceWarning: Enable tracemalloc to get the object allocation traceback
6: /usr/lib64/python3.10/subprocess.py:1067: ResourceWarning: subprocess 59240 is still running
6: _warn("subprocess %s is still running" % self.pid,
.
.
.
6: ResourceWarning: Enable tracemalloc to get the object allocation traceback
6: /usr/lib64/python3.10/subprocess.py:1067: ResourceWarning: subprocess 58988 is still running
6: _warn("subprocess %s is still running" % self.pid,
6: ResourceWarning: Enable tracemalloc to get the object allocation traceback
6: /usr/lib64/python3.10/subprocess.py:1067: ResourceWarning: subprocess 58987 is still running
6: _warn("subprocess %s is still running" % self.pid,
6: ResourceWarning: Enable tracemalloc to get the object allocation traceback
6: /usr/lib64/python3.10/subprocess.py:1067: ResourceWarning: subprocess 59242 is still running
6: _warn("subprocess %s is still running" % self.pid,
6: ResourceWarning: Enable tracemalloc to get the object allocation traceback
6:
6: ======================================================================
6: FAIL: test_fd_limit_broker (__main__.FdLimitTest)
6: Check behaviour when running out of file descriptors on accept
6: ----------------------------------------------------------------------
6: Traceback (most recent call last):
6: File "/wip/src/github.com/apache/qpid-proton/c/tests/fdlimit.py", line 77, in test_fd_limit_broker
6: self.assertNotEqual(sender.poll(), 0)
6: AssertionError: 0 == 0
6:
6: ----------------------------------------------------------------------
6: Ran 1 test in 2.162s
6:
6: FAILED (failures=1)
Test #6: c-fdlimit-tests ..................***Failed 2.30 sec
On 2022/03/18 09:28:03 Jiri Daněk wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:20 AM Roddie Kieley <rk...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Has anyone else been testing with python 3.10? I see that we specify
> > python 3.6+ as per:
> >
> > -- Found Python: /usr/bin/python3.10 (found suitable version "3.10.0",
> > minimum required is "3.6") found components: Interpreter Development
> > Development.Module Development.Embed
> >
> > but on Fedora 34 with python 3.10 installed and built using gcc I see that
> > the c-fdlimits-tests fail intermittently. With clang 12.0.1 + python 3.10
> > the list of failures is larger and more consistent. Should we expect this
> > to be a python 3.10 to be usable at the moment? If this is not an issue
> > specific to my environment, are we able to release note it?
> >
>
> Python 3.10 is default on Fedora 35 as well, so I expect most people here
> will use this version of Python.
>
> Does the fdlimits failure look anything like the former problems with the
> test?
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20PROTON%20AND%20text%20~%20c-fdlimits-tests
>
> What are the other failures? Could it be that newer Python is more
> sensitive to detecting resource leaks?
> --
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
> Jiri Daněk
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Qpid Proton 0.37.0 (RC2)
Posted by Gordon Sim <gs...@redhat.com>.
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 9:35 AM Jiri Daněk <jd...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:20 AM Roddie Kieley <rk...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Has anyone else been testing with python 3.10? I see that we specify
> > python 3.6+ as per:
> >
> > -- Found Python: /usr/bin/python3.10 (found suitable version "3.10.0",
> > minimum required is "3.6") found components: Interpreter Development
> > Development.Module Development.Embed
> >
> > but on Fedora 34 with python 3.10 installed and built using gcc I see that
> > the c-fdlimits-tests fail intermittently. With clang 12.0.1 + python 3.10
> > the list of failures is larger and more consistent. Should we expect this
> > to be a python 3.10 to be usable at the moment? If this is not an issue
> > specific to my environment, are we able to release note it?
> >
>
> Python 3.10 is default on Fedora 35 as well, so I expect most people here
> will use this version of Python.
>
> Does the fdlimits failure look anything like the former problems with the
> test?
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20PROTON%20AND%20text%20~%20c-fdlimits-tests
>
> What are the other failures? Could it be that newer Python is more
> sensitive to detecting resource leaks?
That test fails for me with 3.6 (every time so far). I get lots of
resource warnings then an assertion failure:
6: ResourceWarning: Enable tracemalloc to get the object allocation traceback
6: /usr/lib64/python3.10/subprocess.py:1067: ResourceWarning:
subprocess 849819 is still running
6: _warn("subprocess %s is still running" % self.pid,
6: ResourceWarning: Enable tracemalloc to get the object allocation traceback
6: /usr/lib64/python3.10/subprocess.py:1067: ResourceWarning:
subprocess 850082 is still running
6: _warn("subprocess %s is still running" % self.pid,
6: ResourceWarning: Enable tracemalloc to get the object allocation traceback
6:
6: ======================================================================
6: FAIL: test_fd_limit_broker (__main__.FdLimitTest)
6: Check behaviour when running out of file descriptors on accept
6: ----------------------------------------------------------------------
6: Traceback (most recent call last):
6: File "/home/gordon/releases/proton/0.37.0/qpid-proton-0.37.0/c/tests/fdlimit.py",
line 77, in test_fd_limit_broker
6: self.assertNotEqual(sender.poll(), 0)
6: AssertionError: 0 == 0
6:
6: ----------------------------------------------------------------------
6: Ran 1 test in 2.101s
6:
6: FAILED (failures=1)
1/1 Test #6: c-fdlimit-tests ..................***Failed 2.18 sec
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Qpid Proton 0.37.0 (RC2)
Posted by Jiri Daněk <jd...@redhat.com>.
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:20 AM Roddie Kieley <rk...@apache.org> wrote:
> Has anyone else been testing with python 3.10? I see that we specify
> python 3.6+ as per:
>
> -- Found Python: /usr/bin/python3.10 (found suitable version "3.10.0",
> minimum required is "3.6") found components: Interpreter Development
> Development.Module Development.Embed
>
> but on Fedora 34 with python 3.10 installed and built using gcc I see that
> the c-fdlimits-tests fail intermittently. With clang 12.0.1 + python 3.10
> the list of failures is larger and more consistent. Should we expect this
> to be a python 3.10 to be usable at the moment? If this is not an issue
> specific to my environment, are we able to release note it?
>
Python 3.10 is default on Fedora 35 as well, so I expect most people here
will use this version of Python.
Does the fdlimits failure look anything like the former problems with the
test?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20PROTON%20AND%20text%20~%20c-fdlimits-tests
What are the other failures? Could it be that newer Python is more
sensitive to detecting resource leaks?
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
Jiri Daněk
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Qpid Proton 0.37.0 (RC2)
Posted by Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>.
Great, thanks Roddie.
On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 at 08:49, Roddie Kieley <rk...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> With it not being a regression and a jira to look into it further I think I'm +1 for this release in that case.
>
> On 2022/03/21 07:56:10 Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> > Great, thanks for looking into this Cliff.
> >
> > On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 at 05:46, Cliff Jansen <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I can reproduce the problem seen by Roddie with Python 3.10.2 on Fedora 35.
> > >
> > > It fails in the same way with 0.36.0, so it is not a regression.
> > >
> > > If I increase the sleep time in the fdlimit.py driver program, the failure
> > > goes away. In my opinion, this is a flaky test that Python 3.10 triggers
> > > more frequently than previous versions of Python.
> > >
> > > Consequently, I don’t think this is a reason to hold up the release. I will
> > > raise a Jira to look into this further.
> > >
> > > Cliff
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:35 AM Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I haven't, I'm using 3.9.
> > > >
> > > > I seem to recall you seeing issue with the tests (inc this one) with
> > > > 0.36.0, at least in one env whereas in another they all passed.
> > > > Historically I think it has been a little flakey. Though I haven't
> > > > personally had it fail locally.
> > > >
> > > > Unless someone with more of a clue about these bits indicates
> > > > otherwise, I think we will be proceeding. I'll leave the vote open
> > > > until Monday for more feedback.
> > > >
> > > > Robbie
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 at 09:13, Roddie Kieley <rk...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Has anyone else been testing with python 3.10? I see that we specify
> > > > python 3.6+ as per:
> > > > >
> > > > > -- Found Python: /usr/bin/python3.10 (found suitable version "3.10.0",
> > > > minimum required is "3.6") found components: Interpreter Development
> > > > Development.Module Development.Embed
> > > > >
> > > > > but on Fedora 34 with python 3.10 installed and built using gcc I see
> > > > that the c-fdlimits-tests fail intermittently. With clang 12.0.1 + python
> > > > 3.10 the list of failures is larger and more consistent. Should we expect
> > > > this to be a python 3.10 to be usable at the moment? If this is not an
> > > > issue specific to my environment, are we able to release note it?
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2022/03/15 17:33:48 Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> > > > > > Hi folks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I have put together another spin for a Qpid Proton 0.37.0 release,
> > > > > > please give it a test out and vote accordingly.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The files can be grabbed from:
> > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.37.0-rc2/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The JIRAs assigned are:
> > > > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12313720&version=12350731
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It is tagged as 0.37.0-rc2.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Robbie
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Qpid Proton 0.37.0 (RC2)
Posted by Roddie Kieley <rk...@apache.org>.
With it not being a regression and a jira to look into it further I think I'm +1 for this release in that case.
On 2022/03/21 07:56:10 Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> Great, thanks for looking into this Cliff.
>
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 at 05:46, Cliff Jansen <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I can reproduce the problem seen by Roddie with Python 3.10.2 on Fedora 35.
> >
> > It fails in the same way with 0.36.0, so it is not a regression.
> >
> > If I increase the sleep time in the fdlimit.py driver program, the failure
> > goes away. In my opinion, this is a flaky test that Python 3.10 triggers
> > more frequently than previous versions of Python.
> >
> > Consequently, I don’t think this is a reason to hold up the release. I will
> > raise a Jira to look into this further.
> >
> > Cliff
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:35 AM Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I haven't, I'm using 3.9.
> > >
> > > I seem to recall you seeing issue with the tests (inc this one) with
> > > 0.36.0, at least in one env whereas in another they all passed.
> > > Historically I think it has been a little flakey. Though I haven't
> > > personally had it fail locally.
> > >
> > > Unless someone with more of a clue about these bits indicates
> > > otherwise, I think we will be proceeding. I'll leave the vote open
> > > until Monday for more feedback.
> > >
> > > Robbie
> > >
> > > On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 at 09:13, Roddie Kieley <rk...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Has anyone else been testing with python 3.10? I see that we specify
> > > python 3.6+ as per:
> > > >
> > > > -- Found Python: /usr/bin/python3.10 (found suitable version "3.10.0",
> > > minimum required is "3.6") found components: Interpreter Development
> > > Development.Module Development.Embed
> > > >
> > > > but on Fedora 34 with python 3.10 installed and built using gcc I see
> > > that the c-fdlimits-tests fail intermittently. With clang 12.0.1 + python
> > > 3.10 the list of failures is larger and more consistent. Should we expect
> > > this to be a python 3.10 to be usable at the moment? If this is not an
> > > issue specific to my environment, are we able to release note it?
> > > >
> > > > On 2022/03/15 17:33:48 Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> > > > > Hi folks,
> > > > >
> > > > > I have put together another spin for a Qpid Proton 0.37.0 release,
> > > > > please give it a test out and vote accordingly.
> > > > >
> > > > > The files can be grabbed from:
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.37.0-rc2/
> > > > >
> > > > > The JIRAs assigned are:
> > > > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12313720&version=12350731
> > > > >
> > > > > It is tagged as 0.37.0-rc2.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Robbie
> > > > >
> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
> > >
> > >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Qpid Proton 0.37.0 (RC2)
Posted by Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>.
Great, thanks for looking into this Cliff.
On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 at 05:46, Cliff Jansen <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I can reproduce the problem seen by Roddie with Python 3.10.2 on Fedora 35.
>
> It fails in the same way with 0.36.0, so it is not a regression.
>
> If I increase the sleep time in the fdlimit.py driver program, the failure
> goes away. In my opinion, this is a flaky test that Python 3.10 triggers
> more frequently than previous versions of Python.
>
> Consequently, I don’t think this is a reason to hold up the release. I will
> raise a Jira to look into this further.
>
> Cliff
>
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:35 AM Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I haven't, I'm using 3.9.
> >
> > I seem to recall you seeing issue with the tests (inc this one) with
> > 0.36.0, at least in one env whereas in another they all passed.
> > Historically I think it has been a little flakey. Though I haven't
> > personally had it fail locally.
> >
> > Unless someone with more of a clue about these bits indicates
> > otherwise, I think we will be proceeding. I'll leave the vote open
> > until Monday for more feedback.
> >
> > Robbie
> >
> > On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 at 09:13, Roddie Kieley <rk...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Has anyone else been testing with python 3.10? I see that we specify
> > python 3.6+ as per:
> > >
> > > -- Found Python: /usr/bin/python3.10 (found suitable version "3.10.0",
> > minimum required is "3.6") found components: Interpreter Development
> > Development.Module Development.Embed
> > >
> > > but on Fedora 34 with python 3.10 installed and built using gcc I see
> > that the c-fdlimits-tests fail intermittently. With clang 12.0.1 + python
> > 3.10 the list of failures is larger and more consistent. Should we expect
> > this to be a python 3.10 to be usable at the moment? If this is not an
> > issue specific to my environment, are we able to release note it?
> > >
> > > On 2022/03/15 17:33:48 Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> > > > Hi folks,
> > > >
> > > > I have put together another spin for a Qpid Proton 0.37.0 release,
> > > > please give it a test out and vote accordingly.
> > > >
> > > > The files can be grabbed from:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.37.0-rc2/
> > > >
> > > > The JIRAs assigned are:
> > > >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12313720&version=12350731
> > > >
> > > > It is tagged as 0.37.0-rc2.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Robbie
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
> >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Qpid Proton 0.37.0 (RC2)
Posted by Cliff Jansen <cl...@gmail.com>.
I can reproduce the problem seen by Roddie with Python 3.10.2 on Fedora 35.
It fails in the same way with 0.36.0, so it is not a regression.
If I increase the sleep time in the fdlimit.py driver program, the failure
goes away. In my opinion, this is a flaky test that Python 3.10 triggers
more frequently than previous versions of Python.
Consequently, I don’t think this is a reason to hold up the release. I will
raise a Jira to look into this further.
Cliff
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:35 AM Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I haven't, I'm using 3.9.
>
> I seem to recall you seeing issue with the tests (inc this one) with
> 0.36.0, at least in one env whereas in another they all passed.
> Historically I think it has been a little flakey. Though I haven't
> personally had it fail locally.
>
> Unless someone with more of a clue about these bits indicates
> otherwise, I think we will be proceeding. I'll leave the vote open
> until Monday for more feedback.
>
> Robbie
>
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 at 09:13, Roddie Kieley <rk...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Has anyone else been testing with python 3.10? I see that we specify
> python 3.6+ as per:
> >
> > -- Found Python: /usr/bin/python3.10 (found suitable version "3.10.0",
> minimum required is "3.6") found components: Interpreter Development
> Development.Module Development.Embed
> >
> > but on Fedora 34 with python 3.10 installed and built using gcc I see
> that the c-fdlimits-tests fail intermittently. With clang 12.0.1 + python
> 3.10 the list of failures is larger and more consistent. Should we expect
> this to be a python 3.10 to be usable at the moment? If this is not an
> issue specific to my environment, are we able to release note it?
> >
> > On 2022/03/15 17:33:48 Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > I have put together another spin for a Qpid Proton 0.37.0 release,
> > > please give it a test out and vote accordingly.
> > >
> > > The files can be grabbed from:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.37.0-rc2/
> > >
> > > The JIRAs assigned are:
> > >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12313720&version=12350731
> > >
> > > It is tagged as 0.37.0-rc2.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Robbie
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Qpid Proton 0.37.0 (RC2)
Posted by Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>.
I haven't, I'm using 3.9.
I seem to recall you seeing issue with the tests (inc this one) with
0.36.0, at least in one env whereas in another they all passed.
Historically I think it has been a little flakey. Though I haven't
personally had it fail locally.
Unless someone with more of a clue about these bits indicates
otherwise, I think we will be proceeding. I'll leave the vote open
until Monday for more feedback.
Robbie
On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 at 09:13, Roddie Kieley <rk...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Has anyone else been testing with python 3.10? I see that we specify python 3.6+ as per:
>
> -- Found Python: /usr/bin/python3.10 (found suitable version "3.10.0", minimum required is "3.6") found components: Interpreter Development Development.Module Development.Embed
>
> but on Fedora 34 with python 3.10 installed and built using gcc I see that the c-fdlimits-tests fail intermittently. With clang 12.0.1 + python 3.10 the list of failures is larger and more consistent. Should we expect this to be a python 3.10 to be usable at the moment? If this is not an issue specific to my environment, are we able to release note it?
>
> On 2022/03/15 17:33:48 Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I have put together another spin for a Qpid Proton 0.37.0 release,
> > please give it a test out and vote accordingly.
> >
> > The files can be grabbed from:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.37.0-rc2/
> >
> > The JIRAs assigned are:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12313720&version=12350731
> >
> > It is tagged as 0.37.0-rc2.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Robbie
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Qpid Proton 0.37.0 (RC2)
Posted by Roddie Kieley <rk...@apache.org>.
Has anyone else been testing with python 3.10? I see that we specify python 3.6+ as per:
-- Found Python: /usr/bin/python3.10 (found suitable version "3.10.0", minimum required is "3.6") found components: Interpreter Development Development.Module Development.Embed
but on Fedora 34 with python 3.10 installed and built using gcc I see that the c-fdlimits-tests fail intermittently. With clang 12.0.1 + python 3.10 the list of failures is larger and more consistent. Should we expect this to be a python 3.10 to be usable at the moment? If this is not an issue specific to my environment, are we able to release note it?
On 2022/03/15 17:33:48 Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have put together another spin for a Qpid Proton 0.37.0 release,
> please give it a test out and vote accordingly.
>
> The files can be grabbed from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.37.0-rc2/
>
> The JIRAs assigned are:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12313720&version=12350731
>
> It is tagged as 0.37.0-rc2.
>
> Regards,
> Robbie
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Qpid Proton 0.37.0 (RC2)
Posted by Gordon Sim <gs...@redhat.com>.
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 5:40 PM Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have put together another spin for a Qpid Proton 0.37.0 release,
> please give it a test out and vote accordingly.
>
> The files can be grabbed from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.37.0-rc2/
I checked signature and checksum, built from source, ran tests against
it, ran example against router (also built against this rc).
Apart from c-fdlimits-tests all looked ok. Assuming those more
familiar with that test and its history understand the issue with the
test and it is of no concern to them, I am happy to vote +1 on the
release.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Qpid Proton 0.37.0 (RC2)
Posted by Andrew Stitcher <as...@redhat.com>.
+1
I compiled and tested the 0.37.0-rc2 git tag:
Both with C++ and Python bindings.
* FreeBSD 13.0-RELEASE x86_64 (clang 11.0.1)
* Successfully Built RelWithDebInfo and tested with valgrind
with no failures.
* Successfully Build RelWithDebInfo with ASAN, but testing
this is still broken both in our build infrastructure and in
the FreeBSD support for ASAN without threads.
* Raspberry Pi OS (based on debian 10.11) (gcc 8.3)
* Successfully Build RelWithDebInfo, but testing with valgrind
hangs - I didn't investigate this.
* Successfully built RelWithDebInfo with ASAN and this also
tested with no failures.
Andrew
On Tue, 2022-03-15 at 17:33 +0000, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have put together another spin for a Qpid Proton 0.37.0 release,
> please give it a test out and vote accordingly.
>
> The files can be grabbed from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.37.0-rc2/
>
> The JIRAs assigned are:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12313720&version=12350731
>
> It is tagged as 0.37.0-rc2.
>
> Regards,
> Robbie
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Qpid Proton 0.37.0 (RC2)
Posted by Cliff Jansen <cl...@gmail.com>.
+1
Built and tested with new TLS library.
Did basic soak test with Quiver and Qpid Dispatch 1.19 RC2: high message
throughput alternating with 250 simultaneous connections.
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 10:34 AM Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have put together another spin for a Qpid Proton 0.37.0 release,
> please give it a test out and vote accordingly.
>
> The files can be grabbed from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.37.0-rc2/
>
> The JIRAs assigned are:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12313720&version=12350731
>
> It is tagged as 0.37.0-rc2.
>
> Regards,
> Robbie
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Qpid Proton 0.37.0 (RC2)
Posted by Ken Giusti <kg...@redhat.com>.
+1
Built, ctest, validated - all good.
Ran dispatch-router + broker stress test - worked!
Dispatch and Skupper-router in repo CI tests - yes!
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 11:05 AM Timothy Bish <ta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/15/22 13:33, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I have put together another spin for a Qpid Proton 0.37.0 release,
> > please give it a test out and vote accordingly.
> >
> > The files can be grabbed from:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.37.0-rc2/
> >
> > The JIRAs assigned are:
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12313720&version=12350731
> >
> > It is tagged as 0.37.0-rc2.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Robbie
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
> >
> +1
>
> * Validated signatures and checksums
> * Verified license and notice files in archives
> * Built from source and ran the test suite
>
>
> --
> Tim Bish
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
>
>
--
-K
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Qpid Proton 0.37.0 (RC2)
Posted by Timothy Bish <ta...@gmail.com>.
On 3/15/22 13:33, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have put together another spin for a Qpid Proton 0.37.0 release,
> please give it a test out and vote accordingly.
>
> The files can be grabbed from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.37.0-rc2/
>
> The JIRAs assigned are:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12313720&version=12350731
>
> It is tagged as 0.37.0-rc2.
>
> Regards,
> Robbie
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
>
+1
* Validated signatures and checksums
* Verified license and notice files in archives
* Built from source and ran the test suite
--
Tim Bish
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org