You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by "Rick Hillegas (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/12/09 18:50:08 UTC
[jira] [Created] (DERBY-6429) Privilege checks for UPDATE
statements are wrong.
Rick Hillegas created DERBY-6429:
------------------------------------
Summary: Privilege checks for UPDATE statements are wrong.
Key: DERBY-6429
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6429
Project: Derby
Issue Type: Bug
Components: SQL
Affects Versions: 10.11.0.0
Reporter: Rick Hillegas
UPDATE statements confuse SELECT and UPDATE privileges. Consider the following SET clause:
SET updateColumn = selectColumn
According to part 2 of the 2011 edition of the SQL Standard, that SET clause requires the following privileges:
1) UPDATE privilege on updateColumn. Privileges for the left side of a SET clause are described by section 14.14 (update statement: searched), access rule 1b.
2) SELECT privilege on selectColumn. Privileges for the right side of a SET clause are described by section 14.15 (set clause list) and the various productions underneath value expression. In this case, we have a column reference, whose privileges are governed by section 6.7 (column reference), access rule 2.
However, Derby requires the following:
1') UPDATE privilege on both updateColumn and selectColumn
When we address this bug, we should make corresponding changes to the MERGE statement.
The following script shows the current behavior:
connect 'jdbc:derby:memory:db;user=test_dbo;create=true';
call syscs_util.syscs_create_user( 'TEST_DBO', 'test_dbopassword' );
call syscs_util.syscs_create_user( 'RUTH', 'ruthpassword' );
connect 'jdbc:derby:memory:db;shutdown=true';
connect 'jdbc:derby:memory:db;user=test_dbo;password=test_dbopassword' as dbo;
create table t1_025
(
a int primary key,
updateColumn int,
selectColumn int,
privateColumn int
);
grant update ( updateColumn ) on t1_025 to ruth;
grant select ( selectColumn ) on t1_025 to ruth;
insert into t1_025 values ( 1, 100, 1000, 10000 );
connect 'jdbc:derby:memory:db;user=ruth;password=ruthpassword' as ruth;
-- correctly succeeds because ruth has UPDATE privilege on updateColumn
update test_dbo.t1_025 set updateColumn = 17;
-- the error message incorrectly states that the missing privilege
-- is UPDATE privilege on privateColumn
update test_dbo.t1_025 set updateColumn = privateColumn;
-- incorrectly fails.
-- ruth does have UPDATE privilege on updateColumn
-- and SELECT privilege on selectColumn, which should be good enough.
-- however, the error message incorrectly states that the missing privilege
-- is UPDATE privilege on selectColumn.
update test_dbo.t1_025 set updateColumn = selectColumn;
-- incorrectly succeeds even though ruth does not have SELECT privilege on updateColumn
update test_dbo.t1_025 set updateColumn = 2 * updateColumn;
set connection dbo;
select * from t1_025 order by a;
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.4#6159)