You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to repository@apache.org by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> on 2006/07/06 19:27:26 UTC
Cleaning up the Maven-2 Snapshot repository
I thinkt he M2 repository (and snapshot) should be kept very tight in
terms of naming - things generally should be in org/apache/*.
To that end, I think we should ask the projects to delete:
/www/people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/commonj
/www/people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/excalibur-deprecated
/www/people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/geronimo-spec
/www/people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/bad-content
/www/people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/incubator-activemq
/www/people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/incubator-activemq-bad-perms
/www/people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/depr.tar
Any thoughts?
Bit painful for incubator-activemq as they have releases in there and
not snapshots - I suspect because Incubator doesn't want incubating
projects using the mirrors (which the maven rsync folders happen to
use). Need to work out a solution there.
Hen
Re: Cleaning up the Maven-2 Snapshot repository
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
Can you kill /www/people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/bad-content
too?
Hen
On 7/6/06, Jorg Heymans <jh...@domek.be> wrote:
>
> Henri Yandell wrote:
>
> > /www/people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/excalibur-deprecated
>
> I'll take care of this one.
>
> >
> > Any thoughts?
> >
>
> +1 for keeping the repo organized ofcourse.
>
>
>
> Actually, do we have any access log statistics for our repos? That way
> we could identify heavily-used artifacts from hardly-used-artifacts and
> act accordingly with regards to cleanup or even mavenization of the
> artifact in question. Just a thought ...
>
>
> Jorg
>
Re: Cleaning up the Maven-2 Snapshot repository
Posted by Jorg Heymans <jh...@domek.be>.
Henri Yandell wrote:
> /www/people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/excalibur-deprecated
I'll take care of this one.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
+1 for keeping the repo organized ofcourse.
Actually, do we have any access log statistics for our repos? That way
we could identify heavily-used artifacts from hardly-used-artifacts and
act accordingly with regards to cleanup or even mavenization of the
artifact in question. Just a thought ...
Jorg