You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@cxf.apache.org by "Ralf Taugerbeck (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/12/10 14:12:43 UTC
[jira] Created: (CXF-1275) System property -Dcxf.config.file has no
effect
System property -Dcxf.config.file has no effect
-----------------------------------------------
Key: CXF-1275
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1275
Project: CXF
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Configuration
Affects Versions: 2.0.3
Reporter: Ralf Taugerbeck
I would like to specify a custom cxf configuration file to my client application (e.g. META-INF/cxf.xml), but the system property -Dcxf.config.file obviously has no effect.
Because the default constructor of ConfigurerImpl passes the name of the default config file, the corresponding code in ConfigurerImpl(String cfgFile) is never executed:
public ConfigurerImpl(String cfgFile) {
if (null == cfgFile) {
cfgFile = System.getProperty(USER_CFG_FILE_PROPERTY_NAME);
}
...
Could you please modifiy the code of the default constructor to:
public ConfigurerImpl() {
this(null);
}
or something equivalent? I'm not sure whether this issue is fixed by the #CXF-1260 patch.
Thanks,
Ralf
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Re: [jira] Commented: (CXF-1275) System property -Dcxf.config.file
has no effect
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
That is a strong indication that you need URL syntax, not spring syntax.
Replace the classpath: with a URL.
On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 06:13 -0800, Ralf Taugerbeck (JIRA) wrote:
> [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12550083 ]
>
> Ralf Taugerbeck commented on CXF-1275:
> --------------------------------------
>
> If I try your proposal I get an error message from org.apache.cxf.bus.spring.BusApplicationContext#getConfigResources
>
> "The configuration file URL classpath:META-INF/cxf.xml is a a malformed URL."
>
> Ralf
>
> > System property -Dcxf.config.file has no effect
> > -----------------------------------------------
> >
> > Key: CXF-1275
> > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1275
> > Project: CXF
> > Issue Type: Bug
> > Components: Configuration
> > Affects Versions: 2.0.3
> > Reporter: Ralf Taugerbeck
> >
> > I would like to specify a custom cxf configuration file to my client application (e.g. META-INF/cxf.xml), but the system property -Dcxf.config.file obviously has no effect.
> > Because the default constructor of ConfigurerImpl passes the name of the default config file, the corresponding code in ConfigurerImpl(String cfgFile) is never executed:
> > public ConfigurerImpl(String cfgFile) {
> > if (null == cfgFile) {
> > cfgFile = System.getProperty(USER_CFG_FILE_PROPERTY_NAME);
> > }
> > ...
> > Could you please modifiy the code of the default constructor to:
> > public ConfigurerImpl() {
> > this(null);
> > }
> > or something equivalent? I'm not sure whether this issue is fixed by the #CXF-1260 patch.
> > Thanks,
> > Ralf
>
[jira] Commented: (CXF-1275) System property -Dcxf.config.file has
no effect
Posted by "Ralf Taugerbeck (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12550083 ]
Ralf Taugerbeck commented on CXF-1275:
--------------------------------------
If I try your proposal I get an error message from org.apache.cxf.bus.spring.BusApplicationContext#getConfigResources
"The configuration file URL classpath:META-INF/cxf.xml is a a malformed URL."
Ralf
> System property -Dcxf.config.file has no effect
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CXF-1275
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1275
> Project: CXF
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Configuration
> Affects Versions: 2.0.3
> Reporter: Ralf Taugerbeck
>
> I would like to specify a custom cxf configuration file to my client application (e.g. META-INF/cxf.xml), but the system property -Dcxf.config.file obviously has no effect.
> Because the default constructor of ConfigurerImpl passes the name of the default config file, the corresponding code in ConfigurerImpl(String cfgFile) is never executed:
> public ConfigurerImpl(String cfgFile) {
> if (null == cfgFile) {
> cfgFile = System.getProperty(USER_CFG_FILE_PROPERTY_NAME);
> }
> ...
> Could you please modifiy the code of the default constructor to:
> public ConfigurerImpl() {
> this(null);
> }
> or something equivalent? I'm not sure whether this issue is fixed by the #CXF-1260 patch.
> Thanks,
> Ralf
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (CXF-1275) System property -Dcxf.config.file has
no effect
Posted by "Gary Tully (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12550077 ]
Gary Tully commented on CXF-1275:
---------------------------------
I think the fix for #CXF-1260 will not help. The resolution of config in ConfigureImpl is unnecessary. The BusApplicationContext does the real work.
I think you need to use the URL version to specify the config file:
-Dcxf.config.file.url=classpath:META-INF/cxf.xml
Gary.
> System property -Dcxf.config.file has no effect
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CXF-1275
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1275
> Project: CXF
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Configuration
> Affects Versions: 2.0.3
> Reporter: Ralf Taugerbeck
>
> I would like to specify a custom cxf configuration file to my client application (e.g. META-INF/cxf.xml), but the system property -Dcxf.config.file obviously has no effect.
> Because the default constructor of ConfigurerImpl passes the name of the default config file, the corresponding code in ConfigurerImpl(String cfgFile) is never executed:
> public ConfigurerImpl(String cfgFile) {
> if (null == cfgFile) {
> cfgFile = System.getProperty(USER_CFG_FILE_PROPERTY_NAME);
> }
> ...
> Could you please modifiy the code of the default constructor to:
> public ConfigurerImpl() {
> this(null);
> }
> or something equivalent? I'm not sure whether this issue is fixed by the #CXF-1260 patch.
> Thanks,
> Ralf
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (CXF-1275) System property -Dcxf.config.file has
no effect
Posted by "Benson Margulies (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12552012 ]
Benson Margulies commented on CXF-1275:
---------------------------------------
I just used -Dcxf.config.file today successfully. It is a classpath, in absolute format (no leading slash).
To diagnose problems like these, I put invalid XML into my cxf.xml and watch for the error.
I recommend not using the name cxf.xml. Put yours at META-INF/mycxf.xml, or whatever, and -Dcxf.config.file=META-INF/mycxf.xml.
> System property -Dcxf.config.file has no effect
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CXF-1275
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1275
> Project: CXF
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Configuration
> Affects Versions: 2.0.3
> Reporter: Ralf Taugerbeck
>
> I would like to specify a custom cxf configuration file to my client application (e.g. META-INF/cxf.xml), but the system property -Dcxf.config.file obviously has no effect.
> Because the default constructor of ConfigurerImpl passes the name of the default config file, the corresponding code in ConfigurerImpl(String cfgFile) is never executed:
> public ConfigurerImpl(String cfgFile) {
> if (null == cfgFile) {
> cfgFile = System.getProperty(USER_CFG_FILE_PROPERTY_NAME);
> }
> ...
> Could you please modifiy the code of the default constructor to:
> public ConfigurerImpl() {
> this(null);
> }
> or something equivalent? I'm not sure whether this issue is fixed by the #CXF-1260 patch.
> Thanks,
> Ralf
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Closed: (CXF-1275) System property -Dcxf.config.file has no
effect
Posted by "Ralf Taugerbeck (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Ralf Taugerbeck closed CXF-1275.
--------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks, that works.
> System property -Dcxf.config.file has no effect
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CXF-1275
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1275
> Project: CXF
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Configuration
> Affects Versions: 2.0.3
> Reporter: Ralf Taugerbeck
>
> I would like to specify a custom cxf configuration file to my client application (e.g. META-INF/cxf.xml), but the system property -Dcxf.config.file obviously has no effect.
> Because the default constructor of ConfigurerImpl passes the name of the default config file, the corresponding code in ConfigurerImpl(String cfgFile) is never executed:
> public ConfigurerImpl(String cfgFile) {
> if (null == cfgFile) {
> cfgFile = System.getProperty(USER_CFG_FILE_PROPERTY_NAME);
> }
> ...
> Could you please modifiy the code of the default constructor to:
> public ConfigurerImpl() {
> this(null);
> }
> or something equivalent? I'm not sure whether this issue is fixed by the #CXF-1260 patch.
> Thanks,
> Ralf
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.