You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flink.apache.org by Matthias Pohl <ma...@apache.org> on 2024/12/18 09:41:18 UTC
[DISCUSS] Flink 1.18.2 release & grace period for EOL versions
Hi everyone,
with the release of 1.20.0 [1], 1.18 reached its EOL. The community has
decided to do a final "flush out" release in this case if it's requested
(and, I guess, there is someone volunteering to do this). There was a
question about release 1.18.2 [2] in the past. 1.18.2 contains 76 fixes
[3].
The reason I am asking is that we still have CI enabled for 1.18. It is
failing constantly [4] which means we would have to resolve this first
before releasing 1.18.2.
Shall we add a grace period for this flush out release to happen to avoid
having CI enabled for ever?
Anyway, I would suggest disabling 1.18 CI and not pursuing the 1.18.2
release considering that the only time it was raised was 8 month ago to
save resources. Any opinions on that?
Best,
Matthias
[1]
https://flink.apache.org/2024/08/02/announcing-the-release-of-apache-flink-1.20/
[2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/bhhkzsv8hkzbbt5ydqottbkgrlx2dfqt
[3]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-35728?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.18.2%20AND%20status%20IN%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20ORDER%20BY%20updatedDate
[4]
https://dev.azure.com/apache-flink/apache-flink/_build?definitionId=1&_a=summary&repositoryFilter=1&branchFilter=37476%2C37476%2C37476
Re: [DISCUSS] Flink 1.18.2 release & grace period for EOL versions
Posted by Matthias Pohl <mp...@confluent.io.INVALID>.
FYI: The nightly runs for 1.18 are deactivated in Azure and GHA
On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 1:02 PM Matthias Pohl <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> Ok, thanks for your feedback. I will go ahead with disabling CI for 1.18
> next week if no other objections are shared.
>
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2025 at 5:21 PM Rui Fan <19...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Matthias for starting this discussion!
>>
>> +1 for disabling CI for 1.18.*
>>
>> Best,
>> Rui
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 3, 2025 at 11:45 PM Robert Metzger <rm...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hey Matthias,
>> >
>> > it seems that there is no traction for creating another 1.18.x bugfix
>> > release, so *I'm +1 for disabling CI for 1.18.*
>> >
>> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 10:41 AM Matthias Pohl <ma...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi everyone,
>> > > with the release of 1.20.0 [1], 1.18 reached its EOL. The community
>> has
>> > > decided to do a final "flush out" release in this case if it's
>> requested
>> > > (and, I guess, there is someone volunteering to do this). There was a
>> > > question about release 1.18.2 [2] in the past. 1.18.2 contains 76
>> fixes
>> > > [3].
>> > >
>> > > The reason I am asking is that we still have CI enabled for 1.18. It
>> is
>> > > failing constantly [4] which means we would have to resolve this first
>> > > before releasing 1.18.2.
>> > >
>> > > Shall we add a grace period for this flush out release to happen to
>> avoid
>> > > having CI enabled for ever?
>> > >
>> > > Anyway, I would suggest disabling 1.18 CI and not pursuing the 1.18.2
>> > > release considering that the only time it was raised was 8 month ago
>> to
>> > > save resources. Any opinions on that?
>> > >
>> > > Best,
>> > > Matthias
>> > >
>> > > [1]
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://flink.apache.org/2024/08/02/announcing-the-release-of-apache-flink-1.20/
>> > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/bhhkzsv8hkzbbt5ydqottbkgrlx2dfqt
>> > > [3]
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-35728?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.18.2%20AND%20status%20IN%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20ORDER%20BY%20updatedDate
>> > > [4]
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://dev.azure.com/apache-flink/apache-flink/_build?definitionId=1&_a=summary&repositoryFilter=1&branchFilter=37476%2C37476%2C37476
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Flink 1.18.2 release & grace period for EOL versions
Posted by Matthias Pohl <ma...@apache.org>.
Ok, thanks for your feedback. I will go ahead with disabling CI for 1.18
next week if no other objections are shared.
On Fri, Jan 3, 2025 at 5:21 PM Rui Fan <19...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Matthias for starting this discussion!
>
> +1 for disabling CI for 1.18.*
>
> Best,
> Rui
>
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2025 at 11:45 PM Robert Metzger <rm...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey Matthias,
> >
> > it seems that there is no traction for creating another 1.18.x bugfix
> > release, so *I'm +1 for disabling CI for 1.18.*
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 10:41 AM Matthias Pohl <ma...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > > with the release of 1.20.0 [1], 1.18 reached its EOL. The community has
> > > decided to do a final "flush out" release in this case if it's
> requested
> > > (and, I guess, there is someone volunteering to do this). There was a
> > > question about release 1.18.2 [2] in the past. 1.18.2 contains 76 fixes
> > > [3].
> > >
> > > The reason I am asking is that we still have CI enabled for 1.18. It is
> > > failing constantly [4] which means we would have to resolve this first
> > > before releasing 1.18.2.
> > >
> > > Shall we add a grace period for this flush out release to happen to
> avoid
> > > having CI enabled for ever?
> > >
> > > Anyway, I would suggest disabling 1.18 CI and not pursuing the 1.18.2
> > > release considering that the only time it was raised was 8 month ago to
> > > save resources. Any opinions on that?
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Matthias
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://flink.apache.org/2024/08/02/announcing-the-release-of-apache-flink-1.20/
> > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/bhhkzsv8hkzbbt5ydqottbkgrlx2dfqt
> > > [3]
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-35728?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.18.2%20AND%20status%20IN%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20ORDER%20BY%20updatedDate
> > > [4]
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://dev.azure.com/apache-flink/apache-flink/_build?definitionId=1&_a=summary&repositoryFilter=1&branchFilter=37476%2C37476%2C37476
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Flink 1.18.2 release & grace period for EOL versions
Posted by Rui Fan <19...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Matthias for starting this discussion!
+1 for disabling CI for 1.18.*
Best,
Rui
On Fri, Jan 3, 2025 at 11:45 PM Robert Metzger <rm...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hey Matthias,
>
> it seems that there is no traction for creating another 1.18.x bugfix
> release, so *I'm +1 for disabling CI for 1.18.*
>
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 10:41 AM Matthias Pohl <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> > with the release of 1.20.0 [1], 1.18 reached its EOL. The community has
> > decided to do a final "flush out" release in this case if it's requested
> > (and, I guess, there is someone volunteering to do this). There was a
> > question about release 1.18.2 [2] in the past. 1.18.2 contains 76 fixes
> > [3].
> >
> > The reason I am asking is that we still have CI enabled for 1.18. It is
> > failing constantly [4] which means we would have to resolve this first
> > before releasing 1.18.2.
> >
> > Shall we add a grace period for this flush out release to happen to avoid
> > having CI enabled for ever?
> >
> > Anyway, I would suggest disabling 1.18 CI and not pursuing the 1.18.2
> > release considering that the only time it was raised was 8 month ago to
> > save resources. Any opinions on that?
> >
> > Best,
> > Matthias
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> https://flink.apache.org/2024/08/02/announcing-the-release-of-apache-flink-1.20/
> > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/bhhkzsv8hkzbbt5ydqottbkgrlx2dfqt
> > [3]
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-35728?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.18.2%20AND%20status%20IN%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20ORDER%20BY%20updatedDate
> > [4]
> >
> >
> https://dev.azure.com/apache-flink/apache-flink/_build?definitionId=1&_a=summary&repositoryFilter=1&branchFilter=37476%2C37476%2C37476
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Flink 1.18.2 release & grace period for EOL versions
Posted by Robert Metzger <rm...@apache.org>.
Hey Matthias,
it seems that there is no traction for creating another 1.18.x bugfix
release, so *I'm +1 for disabling CI for 1.18.*
On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 10:41 AM Matthias Pohl <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> with the release of 1.20.0 [1], 1.18 reached its EOL. The community has
> decided to do a final "flush out" release in this case if it's requested
> (and, I guess, there is someone volunteering to do this). There was a
> question about release 1.18.2 [2] in the past. 1.18.2 contains 76 fixes
> [3].
>
> The reason I am asking is that we still have CI enabled for 1.18. It is
> failing constantly [4] which means we would have to resolve this first
> before releasing 1.18.2.
>
> Shall we add a grace period for this flush out release to happen to avoid
> having CI enabled for ever?
>
> Anyway, I would suggest disabling 1.18 CI and not pursuing the 1.18.2
> release considering that the only time it was raised was 8 month ago to
> save resources. Any opinions on that?
>
> Best,
> Matthias
>
> [1]
>
> https://flink.apache.org/2024/08/02/announcing-the-release-of-apache-flink-1.20/
> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/bhhkzsv8hkzbbt5ydqottbkgrlx2dfqt
> [3]
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-35728?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.18.2%20AND%20status%20IN%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20ORDER%20BY%20updatedDate
> [4]
>
> https://dev.azure.com/apache-flink/apache-flink/_build?definitionId=1&_a=summary&repositoryFilter=1&branchFilter=37476%2C37476%2C37476
>