You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to java-user@lucene.apache.org by testn <te...@doramail.com> on 2007/08/02 13:24:10 UTC

Re: LUCENE-843 Release

Mike, as a committer, what do you think?

Thanks!


Peter Keegan wrote:
> 
> I've built a production index with this patch and done some query stress
> testing with no problems.
> I'd give it a thumbs up.
> 
> Peter
> 
> On 7/30/07, testn <te...@doramail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> Do you think LUCENE-843 is stable enough? If so, do you think it's worth
>> to
>> release it with probably LUCENE 2.2.1? It would be nice so that people
>> can
>> take the advantage of it right away without risking other breaking
>> changes
>> in the HEAD branch or waiting until 2.3 release.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/LUCENE-843-Release-tf4170191.html#a11863644
>> Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/LUCENE-843-Release-tf4170191.html#a11962690
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org


Re: LUCENE-843 Release

Posted by testn <te...@doramail.com>.
Thanks! Will look forward to 2.3 then.


Michael McCandless-2 wrote:
> 
> 
> Honestly I don't really think this is a good idea.
> 
> While LUCENE-843 has proven stable so far (knock on wood!), it is
> still a major change and I do worry (less with time :) that maybe I
> broke something subtle somewhere.
> 
> While a few brave people have tested the trunk in their production
> worlds and seen good performance gains, that testing is still limited
> compared to a real release.
> 
> A point release (2.4.1) really is not supposed to contain major
> changes, just bug fixes, and so I don't think we should violate that
> accepted practice.
> 
> I would rather see us finish up 2.3 and release it, and going forwards
> do more frequent releases, instead of porting big changes back onto
> point releases.
> 
> Mike
> 
> "testn" <te...@doramail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Mike, as a committer, what do you think?
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> 
>> Peter Keegan wrote:
>> > 
>> > I've built a production index with this patch and done some query
>> stress
>> > testing with no problems.
>> > I'd give it a thumbs up.
>> > 
>> > Peter
>> > 
>> > On 7/30/07, testn <te...@doramail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Hi guys,
>> >>
>> >> Do you think LUCENE-843 is stable enough? If so, do you think it's
>> worth
>> >> to
>> >> release it with probably LUCENE 2.2.1? It would be nice so that people
>> >> can
>> >> take the advantage of it right away without risking other breaking
>> >> changes
>> >> in the HEAD branch or waiting until 2.3 release.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> --
>> >> View this message in context:
>> >> http://www.nabble.com/LUCENE-843-Release-tf4170191.html#a11863644
>> >> Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>> >>
>> >>
>> > 
>> > 
>> 
>> -- 
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/LUCENE-843-Release-tf4170191.html#a11962690
>> Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
>> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/LUCENE-843-Release-tf4170191.html#a11963778
Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org


Re: LUCENE-843 Release

Posted by Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com>.
Honestly I don't really think this is a good idea.

While LUCENE-843 has proven stable so far (knock on wood!), it is
still a major change and I do worry (less with time :) that maybe I
broke something subtle somewhere.

While a few brave people have tested the trunk in their production
worlds and seen good performance gains, that testing is still limited
compared to a real release.

A point release (2.4.1) really is not supposed to contain major
changes, just bug fixes, and so I don't think we should violate that
accepted practice.

I would rather see us finish up 2.3 and release it, and going forwards
do more frequent releases, instead of porting big changes back onto
point releases.

Mike

"testn" <te...@doramail.com> wrote:
> 
> Mike, as a committer, what do you think?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> 
> Peter Keegan wrote:
> > 
> > I've built a production index with this patch and done some query stress
> > testing with no problems.
> > I'd give it a thumbs up.
> > 
> > Peter
> > 
> > On 7/30/07, testn <te...@doramail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi guys,
> >>
> >> Do you think LUCENE-843 is stable enough? If so, do you think it's worth
> >> to
> >> release it with probably LUCENE 2.2.1? It would be nice so that people
> >> can
> >> take the advantage of it right away without risking other breaking
> >> changes
> >> in the HEAD branch or waiting until 2.3 release.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> --
> >> View this message in context:
> >> http://www.nabble.com/LUCENE-843-Release-tf4170191.html#a11863644
> >> Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/LUCENE-843-Release-tf4170191.html#a11962690
> Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-user-help@lucene.apache.org