You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@cloudstack.apache.org by "ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/06/27 08:23:24 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6884) List Capacity API always returns GPU capacity also even if type is different

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14045598#comment-14045598 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-6884:
-------------------------------------------------------------

Commit 48646ae186eb75052da3da385404a823bd785444 in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.4-forward from [~sanjay.tripathi]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=48646ae ]

CLOUDSTACK-6884: List Capacity API always returns GPU capacity also even if type is different.


> List Capacity API always returns GPU capacity also even if type is different
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-6884
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6884
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) 
>          Components: API
>    Affects Versions: 4.4.0
>            Reporter: Saksham Srivastava
>            Assignee: Sanjay Tripathi
>
> Using cloudmonkey to test the API response:
> monkey# list capacity type=2
> count = 2
> capacity:
> capacitytotal = 5948946644992
> capacityused = 1154143485952
> percentused = 19.4
> type = 2
> zoneid = 7ea9a47c-7f39-4334-82e5-896a5d02aeb2
> zonename = z1
> ================================================================================
> capacitytotal = 0
> capacityused = 0
> percentused = 0
> type = 19
> zoneid = 7ea9a47c-7f39-4334-82e5-896a5d02aeb2
> zonename = z1
> List capacity should not return GPU capacity if type other than 19 is passed.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)