You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@lucenenet.apache.org by "Digy (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/01/21 22:51:45 UTC

[jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-389) Signing the released assembly

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-389?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12984957#action_12984957 ] 

Digy commented on LUCENENET-389:
--------------------------------

You are right. We should think of signing Lucene.Net when  we get an official release.

DIGY

> Signing the released assembly
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENENET-389
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-389
>             Project: Lucene.Net
>          Issue Type: Wish
>            Reporter: Patric Forsgard
>
> In the project I working in i need a signed version of the Lucene.Net-assembly. For the moment I will compile and sign with my own key but it would be great if the official release already should be signed.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.