You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com> on 2011/09/17 02:38:40 UTC
[VOTE] Release of Trinidad 2.0.1
Hi Everyone,
I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.1 release out and
now I need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not. I have
committed most of the most recent submitted patches and things look to
be fairly stable. There are a few patches outstanding, but I wanted to
put those into trunk so that they can get some more testing.
Therefore, I would like to ask for a vote on this release. All of the
following should be ready for review:
* The generated repository and assembly artifacts [1]
* The generated source archive [2]
* The updated svn repository [3]
Please review the artifacts and vote according to the following:
------------------------------------------------
[ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
and why..............
------------------------------------------------
This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
Thanks,
Scott O'Bryan
[1] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-072
[2]
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-072/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.1/trinidad-2.0.1-source-release.zip
[3] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-2.0.1
Re: [DISCUSS] legal files in WARs like samples etc
Posted by Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>.
Yeah, I'm not sure that simply not distributing war files is
desirable. I mean I'm not against it on principal, but we've always
distributed our demo war as a zip and I'd be interested to hear from
the greater community if this distribution is of any value.
Traditionally we DID NOT distribute the sources into the repository,
but with the new way things are done in nexus now, we do.
Scott
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 19, 2011, at 4:19 PM, Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Could you be more specific? what should we do? just do not distribute
> WAR files? add a note?
>
> regards,
>
> Leonardo Uribe
>
> 2011/9/19 Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>:
>> +1
>> regards,
>> gerhard
>>
>> http://www.irian.at
>>
>> Your JSF powerhouse -
>> JSF Consulting, Development and
>> Courses in English and German
>>
>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>>
>>
>>
>> 2011/9/19 Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Jakob
>>>
>>> 2011/9/19 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm pretty sure this doesn't only hit Trinidad but also a lot other
>>>> projects, so I like to trigger a discussion on this very topic.
>>>>
>>>> Usually we only ship JAR files, and the code in apache-parent should
>>>> make sure that each file properly contains LICENSE and NOTICE files.
>>>> Of course such a mechanism doesn't exist for WAR files which we ship for
>>>> samples and stuff. With shipping WAR files there are 2 problematic issues
>>>>
>>>> 1.) those must contain LICENSE and NOTICE files. See the mail below how
>>>> to solve this.
>>>>
>>>> 2.) we might also 'distribute' (in a legal sense) 3-rd party JAR files
>>>> inside of the WARs WEB-INF/lib directory!
>>>> This is a bummer, and in OWB, we completely disabled the deployment of
>>>> our samples via maven because of that!
>>>> You can get the sources in the source-distribution.zip, you can build it
>>>> yourself, etc. But we don't ship any 3rd party JARs which are not developed
>>>> inside the ASF this way.
>>>>
>>>> Why is this problematic: OWB for example needs javassist which is MPL
>>>> licensed. MPL is perfectly fine as dependency as a lot other CategoryA and
>>>> CategoryB licensed projects are[1]. But MPL needs certain attribution when
>>>> you _distribute_ the project!
>>>>
>>>> WDYT? Is this feasible or MyFaces too?
>>>>
>>>> LieGrue,
>>>> strub
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Forwarded Message -----
>>>>> From: Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>>>>> To: MyFaces Development <de...@myfaces.apache.org>
>>>>> Cc:
>>>>> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 10:50 AM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad 2.0.1
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Scott!
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm sorry, but I fear I have to veto with a -1.
>>>>>
>>>>> trinidad-components-showcase.war (WAR!)
>>>>>
>>>>> has no NOTICE nor LICENSE files I could find.
>>>>>
>>>>> I know we shipped lots of WAR files in the past without those, but I
>>>>> only
>>>>> recently became aware of this problem in OpenWebBeans where I had to
>>>>> re-roll my
>>>>> release too.
>>>>>
>>>>> This can easily get fixed by doing some packaging tricks
>>>>> Please see the maven-war-plugin config of the OWB samples
>>>>>
>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/samples/pom.xml
>>>>>
>>>>> The important part is
>>>>> <webResources> <resource> <directory>.</directory>
>>>>> <targetPath>META-INF</targetPath> <includes>
>>>>> <include>LICENSE</include> <include>NOTICE</include>
>>>>> </includes> </resource> </webResources>
>>>>>
>>>>> Otherwise the release looks fine so far.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> txs LieGrue,
>>>>> strub
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>> From: Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> To: dev@myfaces.apache.org
>>>>>> Cc:
>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2011 2:38 AM
>>>>>> Subject: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad 2.0.1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.1 release out
>>>>>> and
>>>>> now I
>>>>>> need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not. I have
>>>>>> committed
>>>>> most
>>>>>> of the most recent submitted patches and things look to be fairly
>>>>>> stable.
>>>>> There
>>>>>> are a few patches outstanding, but I wanted to put those into trunk
>>>>>> so that
>>>>> they
>>>>>> can get some more testing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Therefore, I would like to ask for a vote on this release. All of
>>>>>> the
>>>>> following
>>>>>> should be ready for review:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * The generated repository and assembly artifacts [1]
>>>>>> * The generated source archive [2]
>>>>>> * The updated svn repository [3]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please review the artifacts and vote according to the following:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
>>>>>> released,
>>>>>> and why..............
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Scott O'Bryan
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-072
>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-072/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.1/trinidad-2.0.1-source-release.zip
>>>>>> [3]
>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-2.0.1
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jakob Korherr
>>>
>>> blog: http://www.jakobk.com
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr
>>> work: http://www.irian.at
>>
>>
Re: Fw: [DISCUSS] legal files in WARs like samples etc
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
As far as I read it this dependency should have been removed:
> The problematic code has been removed. Thanks Matthias for reviewing the code.
>
> regards,
> Catalin
But this has not been happening?
Or has the code already been changed and only the dependency remained untouched (and is now unused)?
LieGrue,
strub
>________________________________
>From: Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>
>To: MyFaces Development <de...@myfaces.apache.org>; Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 11:25 AM
>Subject: Re: Fw: [DISCUSS] legal files in WARs like samples etc
>
>
>there was a discussion [1] about it.
>
>
>regards,
>gerhard
>
>
>[1] http://goo.gl/UccA6
>
>http://www.irian.at
>
>Your JSF powerhouse -
>JSF Consulting, Development and
>Courses in English and German
>
>Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
>
>
>
>
>2011/9/20 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>
>oops this should have been gone to the list^^
>>
>>LieGrue,
>>strub
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>----- Forwarded Message -----
>>> From: Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>>
>>> To: Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>
>>> Cc:
>>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 9:13 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] legal files in WARs like samples etc
>>>
>>> oops, we must not use LPGL at all, as it's a Category X license and not
>>> compatible with ALv2 [1].
>>> Is there some alternative for it?
>>>
>>> LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>>
>>> [http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#transition]
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>
>>
>>>> To: MyFaces Development <de...@myfaces.apache.org>; Mark Struberg
>>> <st...@yahoo.de>
>>>> Cc:
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 2:07 AM
>>
>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] legal files in WARs like samples etc
>>>>
>>>> Hi Mark
>>>>
>>>> Ok, I see. I think we have a problem with
>>>> trinidad-components-showcase. It has jhighlight-1.0.jar and its
>>>> license is LGPL.
>>>>
>>>> The other WARs bundled in other projects (I believe they) are ok .
>>>>
>>>> regards,
>>>>
>>>> Leonardo Uribe
>>>>
>>>> 2011/9/19 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
>>>>> Hi Leo!
>>>>>
>>>>> Imo we should go through all WAR files we create and check which jars
>>> they
>>>> contain.
>>>>> Maybe it's perfectly fine and we only distribute ASF internal or
>>>> CategoryA stuff.
>>>>>
>>>>> In this case not much should be needed. Otherwise we must check the
>>>> licenses of the libs and see which requirements they have.
>>>>>
>>>>> LieGrue,
>>>>> strub
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>> From: Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> To: MyFaces Development <de...@myfaces.apache.org>
>>>>>> Cc:
>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 12:18 AM
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] legal files in WARs like samples etc
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could you be more specific? what should we do? just do not
>>> distribute
>>>>>> WAR files? add a note?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Leonardo Uribe
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2011/9/19 Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>>> gerhard
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.irian.at
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your JSF powerhouse -
>>>>>>> JSF Consulting, Development and
>>>>>>> Courses in English and German
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2011/9/19 Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Jakob
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2011/9/19 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
>>>>>>>> > Hi folks!
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > I'm pretty sure this doesn't only hit
>>> Trinidad
>>>> but also a
>>>>>> lot other
>>>>>>>> > projects, so I like to trigger a discussion on this
>>> very
>>>> topic.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Usually we only ship JAR files, and the code in
>>>> apache-parent
>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>> > make sure that each file properly contains LICENSE
>>> and
>>>> NOTICE
>>>>>> files.
>>>>>>>> > Of course such a mechanism doesn't exist for WAR
>>>
>>>> files which
>>>>>> we ship for
>>>>>>>> > samples and stuff. With shipping WAR files there are
>>> 2
>>>> problematic
>>>>>> issues
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > 1.) those must contain LICENSE and NOTICE files. See
>>> the
>>>> mail
>>>>>> below how
>>>>>>>> > to solve this.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > 2.) we might also 'distribute' (in a legal
>>> sense)
>>>> 3-rd
>>>>>> party JAR files
>>>>>>>> > inside of the WARs WEB-INF/lib directory!
>>>>>>>> > This is a bummer, and in OWB, we completely disabled
>>> the
>>>>>> deployment of
>>>>>>>> > our samples via maven because of that!
>>>>>>>> > You can get the sources in the
>>> source-distribution.zip,
>>>> you can
>>>>>> build it
>>>>>>>> > yourself, etc. But we don't ship any 3rd party
>>> JARs
>>>> which are
>>>>>> not developed
>>>>>>>> > inside the ASF this way.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Why is this problematic: OWB for example needs
>>> javassist
>>>> which is
>>>>>> MPL
>>>>>>>> > licensed. MPL is perfectly fine as dependency as a
>>> lot
>>>> other
>>>>>> CategoryA and
>>>>>>>> > CategoryB licensed projects are[1]. But MPL needs
>>> certain
>>>>>> attribution when
>>>>>>>> > you _distribute_ the project!
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > WDYT? Is this feasible or MyFaces too?
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > LieGrue,
>>>>>>>> > strub
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > ----- Forwarded Message -----
>>>>>>>> >> From: Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>>>>>>>> >> To: MyFaces Development
>>>> <de...@myfaces.apache.org>
>>>>>>>> >> Cc:
>>>>>>>> >> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 10:50 AM
>>>>>>>> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad 2.0.1
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> Hi Scott!
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> I'm sorry, but I fear I have to veto with a
>>> -1.
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> trinidad-components-showcase.war (WAR!)
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> has no NOTICE nor LICENSE files I could find.
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> I know we shipped lots of WAR files in the past
>>>> without those,
>>>>>> but I
>>>>>>>> >> only
>>>>>>>> >> recently became aware of this problem in
>>> OpenWebBeans
>>>> where I
>>>>>> had to
>>>>>>>> >> re-roll my
>>>>>>>> >> release too.
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> This can easily get fixed by doing some
>>> packaging
>>>> tricks
>>>>>>>> >> Please see the maven-war-plugin config of the
>>> OWB
>>>> samples
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/samples/pom.xml
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> The important part is
>>>>>>>> >> <webResources> <resource>
>>>>>> <directory>.</directory>
>>>>>>>> >> <targetPath>META-INF</targetPath>
>>>> <includes>
>>>>>>>> >> <include>LICENSE</include>
>>>>>> <include>NOTICE</include>
>>>>>>>> >> </includes> </resource>
>>>> </webResources>
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> Otherwise the release looks fine so far.
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> txs LieGrue,
>>>>>>>> >> strub
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>>> >>> From: Scott O'Bryan
>>>> <da...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> >>> To: dev@myfaces.apache.org
>>>>>>>> >>> Cc:
>>>>>>>> >>> Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2011 2:38 AM
>>>>>>>> >>> Subject: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad 2.0.1
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>> I was running the tasks needed to get the
>>>> Trinidad 2.0.1
>>>>>> release out
>>>>>>>> >>> and
>>>>>>>> >> now I
>>>>>>>> >>> need a vote as to whether everything looks
>>> good
>>>> or not.
>>>>>> I have
>>>>>>>> >>> committed
>>>>>>>> >> most
>>>>>>>> >>> of the most recent submitted patches and
>>> things
>>>> look to
>>>>>> be fairly
>>>>>>>> >>> stable.
>>>>>>>> >> There
>>>>>>>> >>> are a few patches outstanding, but I wanted
>>> to
>>>> put those
>>>>>> into trunk
>>>>>>>> >>> so that
>>>>>>>> >> they
>>>>>>>> >>> can get some more testing.
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>> Therefore, I would like to ask for a vote
>>> on
>>>> this
>>>>>> release. All of
>>>>>>>> >>> the
>>>>>>>> >> following
>>>>>>>> >>> should be ready for review:
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>> * The generated repository and assembly
>>>> artifacts [1]
>>>>>>>> >>> * The generated source archive [2]
>>>>>>>> >>> * The updated svn repository [3]
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>> Please review the artifacts and vote
>>> according
>>>> to the
>>>>>> following:
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> >>> [ ] +1 for community members who have
>>> reviewed
>>>> the bits
>>>>>>>> >>> [ ] +0
>>>>>>>> >>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause
>>> these
>>>> bits not
>>>>>> to be
>>>>>>>> >>> released,
>>>>>>>> >>> and why..............
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>> This vote will remain open for at least 72
>>>> hours.
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> >>> Scott O'Bryan
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>> [1]
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-072
>>>>>>>> >>> [2]
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-072/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.1/trinidad-2.0.1-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>> >>> [3]
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-2.0.1
>>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Jakob Korherr
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> blog: http://www.jakobk.com
>>>>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr
>>>>>>>> work: http://www.irian.at
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
Re: Fw: [DISCUSS] legal files in WARs like samples etc
Posted by Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>.
there was a discussion [1] about it.
regards,
gerhard
[1] http://goo.gl/UccA6
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2011/9/20 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> oops this should have been gone to the list^^
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> ----- Forwarded Message -----
> > From: Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> > To: Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 9:13 AM
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] legal files in WARs like samples etc
> >
> > oops, we must not use LPGL at all, as it's a Category X license and not
> > compatible with ALv2 [1].
> > Is there some alternative for it?
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> > [http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#transition]
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>
> >> To: MyFaces Development <de...@myfaces.apache.org>; Mark Struberg
> > <st...@yahoo.de>
> >> Cc:
> >> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 2:07 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] legal files in WARs like samples etc
> >>
> >> Hi Mark
> >>
> >> Ok, I see. I think we have a problem with
> >> trinidad-components-showcase. It has jhighlight-1.0.jar and its
> >> license is LGPL.
> >>
> >> The other WARs bundled in other projects (I believe they) are ok .
> >>
> >> regards,
> >>
> >> Leonardo Uribe
> >>
> >> 2011/9/19 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
> >>> Hi Leo!
> >>>
> >>> Imo we should go through all WAR files we create and check which jars
> > they
> >> contain.
> >>> Maybe it's perfectly fine and we only distribute ASF internal or
> >> CategoryA stuff.
> >>>
> >>> In this case not much should be needed. Otherwise we must check the
> >> licenses of the libs and see which requirements they have.
> >>>
> >>> LieGrue,
> >>> strub
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>> From: Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>
> >>>> To: MyFaces Development <de...@myfaces.apache.org>
> >>>> Cc:
> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 12:18 AM
> >>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] legal files in WARs like samples etc
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi
> >>>>
> >>>> Could you be more specific? what should we do? just do not
> > distribute
> >>>> WAR files? add a note?
> >>>>
> >>>> regards,
> >>>>
> >>>> Leonardo Uribe
> >>>>
> >>>> 2011/9/19 Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>:
> >>>>> +1
> >>>>> regards,
> >>>>> gerhard
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://www.irian.at
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Your JSF powerhouse -
> >>>>> JSF Consulting, Development and
> >>>>> Courses in English and German
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2011/9/19 Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>> Jakob
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 2011/9/19 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
> >>>>>> > Hi folks!
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > I'm pretty sure this doesn't only hit
> > Trinidad
> >> but also a
> >>>> lot other
> >>>>>> > projects, so I like to trigger a discussion on this
> > very
> >> topic.
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > Usually we only ship JAR files, and the code in
> >> apache-parent
> >>>> should
> >>>>>> > make sure that each file properly contains LICENSE
> > and
> >> NOTICE
> >>>> files.
> >>>>>> > Of course such a mechanism doesn't exist for WAR
> >
> >> files which
> >>>> we ship for
> >>>>>> > samples and stuff. With shipping WAR files there are
> > 2
> >> problematic
> >>>> issues
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > 1.) those must contain LICENSE and NOTICE files. See
> > the
> >> mail
> >>>> below how
> >>>>>> > to solve this.
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > 2.) we might also 'distribute' (in a legal
> > sense)
> >> 3-rd
> >>>> party JAR files
> >>>>>> > inside of the WARs WEB-INF/lib directory!
> >>>>>> > This is a bummer, and in OWB, we completely disabled
> > the
> >>>> deployment of
> >>>>>> > our samples via maven because of that!
> >>>>>> > You can get the sources in the
> > source-distribution.zip,
> >> you can
> >>>> build it
> >>>>>> > yourself, etc. But we don't ship any 3rd party
> > JARs
> >> which are
> >>>> not developed
> >>>>>> > inside the ASF this way.
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > Why is this problematic: OWB for example needs
> > javassist
> >> which is
> >>>> MPL
> >>>>>> > licensed. MPL is perfectly fine as dependency as a
> > lot
> >> other
> >>>> CategoryA and
> >>>>>> > CategoryB licensed projects are[1]. But MPL needs
> > certain
> >>>> attribution when
> >>>>>> > you _distribute_ the project!
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > WDYT? Is this feasible or MyFaces too?
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > LieGrue,
> >>>>>> > strub
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > ----- Forwarded Message -----
> >>>>>> >> From: Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> >>>>>> >> To: MyFaces Development
> >> <de...@myfaces.apache.org>
> >>>>>> >> Cc:
> >>>>>> >> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 10:50 AM
> >>>>>> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad 2.0.1
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>> >> Hi Scott!
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>> >> I'm sorry, but I fear I have to veto with a
> > -1.
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>> >> trinidad-components-showcase.war (WAR!)
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>> >> has no NOTICE nor LICENSE files I could find.
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>> >> I know we shipped lots of WAR files in the past
> >> without those,
> >>>> but I
> >>>>>> >> only
> >>>>>> >> recently became aware of this problem in
> > OpenWebBeans
> >> where I
> >>>> had to
> >>>>>> >> re-roll my
> >>>>>> >> release too.
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>> >> This can easily get fixed by doing some
> > packaging
> >> tricks
> >>>>>> >> Please see the maven-war-plugin config of the
> > OWB
> >> samples
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/samples/pom.xml
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>> >> The important part is
> >>>>>> >> <webResources> <resource>
> >>>> <directory>.</directory>
> >>>>>> >> <targetPath>META-INF</targetPath>
> >> <includes>
> >>>>>> >> <include>LICENSE</include>
> >>>> <include>NOTICE</include>
> >>>>>> >> </includes> </resource>
> >> </webResources>
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>> >> Otherwise the release looks fine so far.
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>> >> txs LieGrue,
> >>>>>> >> strub
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>>>> >>> From: Scott O'Bryan
> >> <da...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>> >>> To: dev@myfaces.apache.org
> >>>>>> >>> Cc:
> >>>>>> >>> Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2011 2:38 AM
> >>>>>> >>> Subject: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad 2.0.1
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>> >>> Hi Everyone,
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>> >>> I was running the tasks needed to get the
> >> Trinidad 2.0.1
> >>>> release out
> >>>>>> >>> and
> >>>>>> >> now I
> >>>>>> >>> need a vote as to whether everything looks
> > good
> >> or not.
> >>>> I have
> >>>>>> >>> committed
> >>>>>> >> most
> >>>>>> >>> of the most recent submitted patches and
> > things
> >> look to
> >>>> be fairly
> >>>>>> >>> stable.
> >>>>>> >> There
> >>>>>> >>> are a few patches outstanding, but I wanted
> > to
> >> put those
> >>>> into trunk
> >>>>>> >>> so that
> >>>>>> >> they
> >>>>>> >>> can get some more testing.
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>> >>> Therefore, I would like to ask for a vote
> > on
> >> this
> >>>> release. All of
> >>>>>> >>> the
> >>>>>> >> following
> >>>>>> >>> should be ready for review:
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>> >>> * The generated repository and assembly
> >> artifacts [1]
> >>>>>> >>> * The generated source archive [2]
> >>>>>> >>> * The updated svn repository [3]
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>> >>> Please review the artifacts and vote
> > according
> >> to the
> >>>> following:
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>> >>>
> > ------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>> >>> [ ] +1 for community members who have
> > reviewed
> >> the bits
> >>>>>> >>> [ ] +0
> >>>>>> >>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause
> > these
> >> bits not
> >>>> to be
> >>>>>> >>> released,
> >>>>>> >>> and why..............
> >>>>>> >>>
> > ------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>> >>> This vote will remain open for at least 72
> >> hours.
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>> >>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> >>> Scott O'Bryan
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>> >>> [1]
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-072
> >>>>>> >>> [2]
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>
> >>
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-072/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.1/trinidad-2.0.1-source-release.zip
> >>>>>> >>> [3]
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-2.0.1
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Jakob Korherr
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> blog: http://www.jakobk.com
> >>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr
> >>>>>> work: http://www.irian.at
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
Fw: [DISCUSS] legal files in WARs like samples etc
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
oops this should have been gone to the list^^
LieGrue,
strub
----- Forwarded Message -----
> From: Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> To: Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 9:13 AM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] legal files in WARs like samples etc
>
> oops, we must not use LPGL at all, as it's a Category X license and not
> compatible with ALv2 [1].
> Is there some alternative for it?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> [http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#transition]
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>
>> To: MyFaces Development <de...@myfaces.apache.org>; Mark Struberg
> <st...@yahoo.de>
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 2:07 AM
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] legal files in WARs like samples etc
>>
>> Hi Mark
>>
>> Ok, I see. I think we have a problem with
>> trinidad-components-showcase. It has jhighlight-1.0.jar and its
>> license is LGPL.
>>
>> The other WARs bundled in other projects (I believe they) are ok .
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Leonardo Uribe
>>
>> 2011/9/19 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
>>> Hi Leo!
>>>
>>> Imo we should go through all WAR files we create and check which jars
> they
>> contain.
>>> Maybe it's perfectly fine and we only distribute ASF internal or
>> CategoryA stuff.
>>>
>>> In this case not much should be needed. Otherwise we must check the
>> licenses of the libs and see which requirements they have.
>>>
>>> LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>
>>>> To: MyFaces Development <de...@myfaces.apache.org>
>>>> Cc:
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 12:18 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] legal files in WARs like samples etc
>>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> Could you be more specific? what should we do? just do not
> distribute
>>>> WAR files? add a note?
>>>>
>>>> regards,
>>>>
>>>> Leonardo Uribe
>>>>
>>>> 2011/9/19 Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>:
>>>>> +1
>>>>> regards,
>>>>> gerhard
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.irian.at
>>>>>
>>>>> Your JSF powerhouse -
>>>>> JSF Consulting, Development and
>>>>> Courses in English and German
>>>>>
>>>>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2011/9/19 Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Jakob
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2011/9/19 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
>>>>>> > Hi folks!
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I'm pretty sure this doesn't only hit
> Trinidad
>> but also a
>>>> lot other
>>>>>> > projects, so I like to trigger a discussion on this
> very
>> topic.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Usually we only ship JAR files, and the code in
>> apache-parent
>>>> should
>>>>>> > make sure that each file properly contains LICENSE
> and
>> NOTICE
>>>> files.
>>>>>> > Of course such a mechanism doesn't exist for WAR
>
>> files which
>>>> we ship for
>>>>>> > samples and stuff. With shipping WAR files there are
> 2
>> problematic
>>>> issues
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > 1.) those must contain LICENSE and NOTICE files. See
> the
>> mail
>>>> below how
>>>>>> > to solve this.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > 2.) we might also 'distribute' (in a legal
> sense)
>> 3-rd
>>>> party JAR files
>>>>>> > inside of the WARs WEB-INF/lib directory!
>>>>>> > This is a bummer, and in OWB, we completely disabled
> the
>>>> deployment of
>>>>>> > our samples via maven because of that!
>>>>>> > You can get the sources in the
> source-distribution.zip,
>> you can
>>>> build it
>>>>>> > yourself, etc. But we don't ship any 3rd party
> JARs
>> which are
>>>> not developed
>>>>>> > inside the ASF this way.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Why is this problematic: OWB for example needs
> javassist
>> which is
>>>> MPL
>>>>>> > licensed. MPL is perfectly fine as dependency as a
> lot
>> other
>>>> CategoryA and
>>>>>> > CategoryB licensed projects are[1]. But MPL needs
> certain
>>>> attribution when
>>>>>> > you _distribute_ the project!
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > WDYT? Is this feasible or MyFaces too?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > LieGrue,
>>>>>> > strub
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > ----- Forwarded Message -----
>>>>>> >> From: Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>>>>>> >> To: MyFaces Development
>> <de...@myfaces.apache.org>
>>>>>> >> Cc:
>>>>>> >> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 10:50 AM
>>>>>> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad 2.0.1
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Hi Scott!
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> I'm sorry, but I fear I have to veto with a
> -1.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> trinidad-components-showcase.war (WAR!)
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> has no NOTICE nor LICENSE files I could find.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> I know we shipped lots of WAR files in the past
>> without those,
>>>> but I
>>>>>> >> only
>>>>>> >> recently became aware of this problem in
> OpenWebBeans
>> where I
>>>> had to
>>>>>> >> re-roll my
>>>>>> >> release too.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> This can easily get fixed by doing some
> packaging
>> tricks
>>>>>> >> Please see the maven-war-plugin config of the
> OWB
>> samples
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/samples/pom.xml
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> The important part is
>>>>>> >> <webResources> <resource>
>>>> <directory>.</directory>
>>>>>> >> <targetPath>META-INF</targetPath>
>> <includes>
>>>>>> >> <include>LICENSE</include>
>>>> <include>NOTICE</include>
>>>>>> >> </includes> </resource>
>> </webResources>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Otherwise the release looks fine so far.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> txs LieGrue,
>>>>>> >> strub
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>> >>> From: Scott O'Bryan
>> <da...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> >>> To: dev@myfaces.apache.org
>>>>>> >>> Cc:
>>>>>> >>> Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2011 2:38 AM
>>>>>> >>> Subject: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad 2.0.1
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> I was running the tasks needed to get the
>> Trinidad 2.0.1
>>>> release out
>>>>>> >>> and
>>>>>> >> now I
>>>>>> >>> need a vote as to whether everything looks
> good
>> or not.
>>>> I have
>>>>>> >>> committed
>>>>>> >> most
>>>>>> >>> of the most recent submitted patches and
> things
>> look to
>>>> be fairly
>>>>>> >>> stable.
>>>>>> >> There
>>>>>> >>> are a few patches outstanding, but I wanted
> to
>> put those
>>>> into trunk
>>>>>> >>> so that
>>>>>> >> they
>>>>>> >>> can get some more testing.
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> Therefore, I would like to ask for a vote
> on
>> this
>>>> release. All of
>>>>>> >>> the
>>>>>> >> following
>>>>>> >>> should be ready for review:
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> * The generated repository and assembly
>> artifacts [1]
>>>>>> >>> * The generated source archive [2]
>>>>>> >>> * The updated svn repository [3]
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> Please review the artifacts and vote
> according
>> to the
>>>> following:
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>>
> ------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> >>> [ ] +1 for community members who have
> reviewed
>> the bits
>>>>>> >>> [ ] +0
>>>>>> >>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause
> these
>> bits not
>>>> to be
>>>>>> >>> released,
>>>>>> >>> and why..............
>>>>>> >>>
> ------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> This vote will remain open for at least 72
>> hours.
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> Thanks,
>>>>>> >>> Scott O'Bryan
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> [1]
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-072
>>>>>> >>> [2]
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>
>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-072/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.1/trinidad-2.0.1-source-release.zip
>>>>>> >>> [3]
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-2.0.1
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Jakob Korherr
>>>>>>
>>>>>> blog: http://www.jakobk.com
>>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr
>>>>>> work: http://www.irian.at
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] legal files in WARs like samples etc
Posted by Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>.
Hi Mark
Ok, I see. I think we have a problem with
trinidad-components-showcase. It has jhighlight-1.0.jar and its
license is LGPL.
The other WARs bundled in other projects (I believe they) are ok .
regards,
Leonardo Uribe
2011/9/19 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
> Hi Leo!
>
> Imo we should go through all WAR files we create and check which jars they contain.
> Maybe it's perfectly fine and we only distribute ASF internal or CategoryA stuff.
>
> In this case not much should be needed. Otherwise we must check the licenses of the libs and see which requirements they have.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>
>> To: MyFaces Development <de...@myfaces.apache.org>
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 12:18 AM
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] legal files in WARs like samples etc
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Could you be more specific? what should we do? just do not distribute
>> WAR files? add a note?
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Leonardo Uribe
>>
>> 2011/9/19 Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>:
>>> +1
>>> regards,
>>> gerhard
>>>
>>> http://www.irian.at
>>>
>>> Your JSF powerhouse -
>>> JSF Consulting, Development and
>>> Courses in English and German
>>>
>>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2011/9/19 Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Jakob
>>>>
>>>> 2011/9/19 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
>>>> > Hi folks!
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > I'm pretty sure this doesn't only hit Trinidad but also a
>> lot other
>>>> > projects, so I like to trigger a discussion on this very topic.
>>>> >
>>>> > Usually we only ship JAR files, and the code in apache-parent
>> should
>>>> > make sure that each file properly contains LICENSE and NOTICE
>> files.
>>>> > Of course such a mechanism doesn't exist for WAR files which
>> we ship for
>>>> > samples and stuff. With shipping WAR files there are 2 problematic
>> issues
>>>> >
>>>> > 1.) those must contain LICENSE and NOTICE files. See the mail
>> below how
>>>> > to solve this.
>>>> >
>>>> > 2.) we might also 'distribute' (in a legal sense) 3-rd
>> party JAR files
>>>> > inside of the WARs WEB-INF/lib directory!
>>>> > This is a bummer, and in OWB, we completely disabled the
>> deployment of
>>>> > our samples via maven because of that!
>>>> > You can get the sources in the source-distribution.zip, you can
>> build it
>>>> > yourself, etc. But we don't ship any 3rd party JARs which are
>> not developed
>>>> > inside the ASF this way.
>>>> >
>>>> > Why is this problematic: OWB for example needs javassist which is
>> MPL
>>>> > licensed. MPL is perfectly fine as dependency as a lot other
>> CategoryA and
>>>> > CategoryB licensed projects are[1]. But MPL needs certain
>> attribution when
>>>> > you _distribute_ the project!
>>>> >
>>>> > WDYT? Is this feasible or MyFaces too?
>>>> >
>>>> > LieGrue,
>>>> > strub
>>>> >
>>>> > [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > ----- Forwarded Message -----
>>>> >> From: Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>>>> >> To: MyFaces Development <de...@myfaces.apache.org>
>>>> >> Cc:
>>>> >> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 10:50 AM
>>>> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad 2.0.1
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Hi Scott!
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I'm sorry, but I fear I have to veto with a -1.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> trinidad-components-showcase.war (WAR!)
>>>> >>
>>>> >> has no NOTICE nor LICENSE files I could find.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I know we shipped lots of WAR files in the past without those,
>> but I
>>>> >> only
>>>> >> recently became aware of this problem in OpenWebBeans where I
>> had to
>>>> >> re-roll my
>>>> >> release too.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> This can easily get fixed by doing some packaging tricks
>>>> >> Please see the maven-war-plugin config of the OWB samples
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/samples/pom.xml
>>>> >>
>>>> >> The important part is
>>>> >> <webResources> <resource>
>> <directory>.</directory>
>>>> >> <targetPath>META-INF</targetPath> <includes>
>>>> >> <include>LICENSE</include>
>> <include>NOTICE</include>
>>>> >> </includes> </resource> </webResources>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Otherwise the release looks fine so far.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> txs LieGrue,
>>>> >> strub
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> >>> From: Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>
>>>> >>> To: dev@myfaces.apache.org
>>>> >>> Cc:
>>>> >>> Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2011 2:38 AM
>>>> >>> Subject: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad 2.0.1
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Hi Everyone,
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.1
>> release out
>>>> >>> and
>>>> >> now I
>>>> >>> need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not.
>> I have
>>>> >>> committed
>>>> >> most
>>>> >>> of the most recent submitted patches and things look to
>> be fairly
>>>> >>> stable.
>>>> >> There
>>>> >>> are a few patches outstanding, but I wanted to put those
>> into trunk
>>>> >>> so that
>>>> >> they
>>>> >>> can get some more testing.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Therefore, I would like to ask for a vote on this
>> release. All of
>>>> >>> the
>>>> >> following
>>>> >>> should be ready for review:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> * The generated repository and assembly artifacts [1]
>>>> >>> * The generated source archive [2]
>>>> >>> * The updated svn repository [3]
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Please review the artifacts and vote according to the
>> following:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>> >>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>>>> >>> [ ] +0
>>>> >>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not
>> to be
>>>> >>> released,
>>>> >>> and why..............
>>>> >>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Thanks,
>>>> >>> Scott O'Bryan
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> [1]
>>>> >>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-072
>>>> >>> [2]
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-072/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.1/trinidad-2.0.1-source-release.zip
>>>> >>> [3]
>>>> >>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-2.0.1
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jakob Korherr
>>>>
>>>> blog: http://www.jakobk.com
>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr
>>>> work: http://www.irian.at
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] legal files in WARs like samples etc
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
Hi Leo!
Imo we should go through all WAR files we create and check which jars they contain.
Maybe it's perfectly fine and we only distribute ASF internal or CategoryA stuff.
In this case not much should be needed. Otherwise we must check the licenses of the libs and see which requirements they have.
LieGrue,
strub
----- Original Message -----
> From: Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>
> To: MyFaces Development <de...@myfaces.apache.org>
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 12:18 AM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] legal files in WARs like samples etc
>
> Hi
>
> Could you be more specific? what should we do? just do not distribute
> WAR files? add a note?
>
> regards,
>
> Leonardo Uribe
>
> 2011/9/19 Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>:
>> +1
>> regards,
>> gerhard
>>
>> http://www.irian.at
>>
>> Your JSF powerhouse -
>> JSF Consulting, Development and
>> Courses in English and German
>>
>> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>>
>>
>>
>> 2011/9/19 Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Jakob
>>>
>>> 2011/9/19 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
>>> > Hi folks!
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > I'm pretty sure this doesn't only hit Trinidad but also a
> lot other
>>> > projects, so I like to trigger a discussion on this very topic.
>>> >
>>> > Usually we only ship JAR files, and the code in apache-parent
> should
>>> > make sure that each file properly contains LICENSE and NOTICE
> files.
>>> > Of course such a mechanism doesn't exist for WAR files which
> we ship for
>>> > samples and stuff. With shipping WAR files there are 2 problematic
> issues
>>> >
>>> > 1.) those must contain LICENSE and NOTICE files. See the mail
> below how
>>> > to solve this.
>>> >
>>> > 2.) we might also 'distribute' (in a legal sense) 3-rd
> party JAR files
>>> > inside of the WARs WEB-INF/lib directory!
>>> > This is a bummer, and in OWB, we completely disabled the
> deployment of
>>> > our samples via maven because of that!
>>> > You can get the sources in the source-distribution.zip, you can
> build it
>>> > yourself, etc. But we don't ship any 3rd party JARs which are
> not developed
>>> > inside the ASF this way.
>>> >
>>> > Why is this problematic: OWB for example needs javassist which is
> MPL
>>> > licensed. MPL is perfectly fine as dependency as a lot other
> CategoryA and
>>> > CategoryB licensed projects are[1]. But MPL needs certain
> attribution when
>>> > you _distribute_ the project!
>>> >
>>> > WDYT? Is this feasible or MyFaces too?
>>> >
>>> > LieGrue,
>>> > strub
>>> >
>>> > [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ----- Forwarded Message -----
>>> >> From: Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>>> >> To: MyFaces Development <de...@myfaces.apache.org>
>>> >> Cc:
>>> >> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 10:50 AM
>>> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad 2.0.1
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi Scott!
>>> >>
>>> >> I'm sorry, but I fear I have to veto with a -1.
>>> >>
>>> >> trinidad-components-showcase.war (WAR!)
>>> >>
>>> >> has no NOTICE nor LICENSE files I could find.
>>> >>
>>> >> I know we shipped lots of WAR files in the past without those,
> but I
>>> >> only
>>> >> recently became aware of this problem in OpenWebBeans where I
> had to
>>> >> re-roll my
>>> >> release too.
>>> >>
>>> >> This can easily get fixed by doing some packaging tricks
>>> >> Please see the maven-war-plugin config of the OWB samples
>>> >>
>>> >>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/samples/pom.xml
>>> >>
>>> >> The important part is
>>> >> <webResources> <resource>
> <directory>.</directory>
>>> >> <targetPath>META-INF</targetPath> <includes>
>>> >> <include>LICENSE</include>
> <include>NOTICE</include>
>>> >> </includes> </resource> </webResources>
>>> >>
>>> >> Otherwise the release looks fine so far.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> txs LieGrue,
>>> >> strub
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> ----- Original Message -----
>>> >>> From: Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>
>>> >>> To: dev@myfaces.apache.org
>>> >>> Cc:
>>> >>> Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2011 2:38 AM
>>> >>> Subject: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad 2.0.1
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Hi Everyone,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.1
> release out
>>> >>> and
>>> >> now I
>>> >>> need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not.
> I have
>>> >>> committed
>>> >> most
>>> >>> of the most recent submitted patches and things look to
> be fairly
>>> >>> stable.
>>> >> There
>>> >>> are a few patches outstanding, but I wanted to put those
> into trunk
>>> >>> so that
>>> >> they
>>> >>> can get some more testing.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Therefore, I would like to ask for a vote on this
> release. All of
>>> >>> the
>>> >> following
>>> >>> should be ready for review:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> * The generated repository and assembly artifacts [1]
>>> >>> * The generated source archive [2]
>>> >>> * The updated svn repository [3]
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Please review the artifacts and vote according to the
> following:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> ------------------------------------------------
>>> >>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>>> >>> [ ] +0
>>> >>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not
> to be
>>> >>> released,
>>> >>> and why..............
>>> >>> ------------------------------------------------
>>> >>>
>>> >>> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Thanks,
>>> >>> Scott O'Bryan
>>> >>>
>>> >>> [1]
>>> >>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-072
>>> >>> [2]
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-072/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.1/trinidad-2.0.1-source-release.zip
>>> >>> [3]
>>> >>>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-2.0.1
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jakob Korherr
>>>
>>> blog: http://www.jakobk.com
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr
>>> work: http://www.irian.at
>>
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] legal files in WARs like samples etc
Posted by Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>.
Hi
Could you be more specific? what should we do? just do not distribute
WAR files? add a note?
regards,
Leonardo Uribe
2011/9/19 Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>:
> +1
> regards,
> gerhard
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
>
>
> 2011/9/19 Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com>
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jakob
>>
>> 2011/9/19 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
>> > Hi folks!
>> >
>> >
>> > I'm pretty sure this doesn't only hit Trinidad but also a lot other
>> > projects, so I like to trigger a discussion on this very topic.
>> >
>> > Usually we only ship JAR files, and the code in apache-parent should
>> > make sure that each file properly contains LICENSE and NOTICE files.
>> > Of course such a mechanism doesn't exist for WAR files which we ship for
>> > samples and stuff. With shipping WAR files there are 2 problematic issues
>> >
>> > 1.) those must contain LICENSE and NOTICE files. See the mail below how
>> > to solve this.
>> >
>> > 2.) we might also 'distribute' (in a legal sense) 3-rd party JAR files
>> > inside of the WARs WEB-INF/lib directory!
>> > This is a bummer, and in OWB, we completely disabled the deployment of
>> > our samples via maven because of that!
>> > You can get the sources in the source-distribution.zip, you can build it
>> > yourself, etc. But we don't ship any 3rd party JARs which are not developed
>> > inside the ASF this way.
>> >
>> > Why is this problematic: OWB for example needs javassist which is MPL
>> > licensed. MPL is perfectly fine as dependency as a lot other CategoryA and
>> > CategoryB licensed projects are[1]. But MPL needs certain attribution when
>> > you _distribute_ the project!
>> >
>> > WDYT? Is this feasible or MyFaces too?
>> >
>> > LieGrue,
>> > strub
>> >
>> > [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Forwarded Message -----
>> >> From: Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>> >> To: MyFaces Development <de...@myfaces.apache.org>
>> >> Cc:
>> >> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 10:50 AM
>> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad 2.0.1
>> >>
>> >> Hi Scott!
>> >>
>> >> I'm sorry, but I fear I have to veto with a -1.
>> >>
>> >> trinidad-components-showcase.war (WAR!)
>> >>
>> >> has no NOTICE nor LICENSE files I could find.
>> >>
>> >> I know we shipped lots of WAR files in the past without those, but I
>> >> only
>> >> recently became aware of this problem in OpenWebBeans where I had to
>> >> re-roll my
>> >> release too.
>> >>
>> >> This can easily get fixed by doing some packaging tricks
>> >> Please see the maven-war-plugin config of the OWB samples
>> >>
>> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/samples/pom.xml
>> >>
>> >> The important part is
>> >> <webResources> <resource> <directory>.</directory>
>> >> <targetPath>META-INF</targetPath> <includes>
>> >> <include>LICENSE</include> <include>NOTICE</include>
>> >> </includes> </resource> </webResources>
>> >>
>> >> Otherwise the release looks fine so far.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> txs LieGrue,
>> >> strub
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ----- Original Message -----
>> >>> From: Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>
>> >>> To: dev@myfaces.apache.org
>> >>> Cc:
>> >>> Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2011 2:38 AM
>> >>> Subject: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad 2.0.1
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi Everyone,
>> >>>
>> >>> I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.1 release out
>> >>> and
>> >> now I
>> >>> need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not. I have
>> >>> committed
>> >> most
>> >>> of the most recent submitted patches and things look to be fairly
>> >>> stable.
>> >> There
>> >>> are a few patches outstanding, but I wanted to put those into trunk
>> >>> so that
>> >> they
>> >>> can get some more testing.
>> >>>
>> >>> Therefore, I would like to ask for a vote on this release. All of
>> >>> the
>> >> following
>> >>> should be ready for review:
>> >>>
>> >>> * The generated repository and assembly artifacts [1]
>> >>> * The generated source archive [2]
>> >>> * The updated svn repository [3]
>> >>>
>> >>> Please review the artifacts and vote according to the following:
>> >>>
>> >>> ------------------------------------------------
>> >>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>> >>> [ ] +0
>> >>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
>> >>> released,
>> >>> and why..............
>> >>> ------------------------------------------------
>> >>>
>> >>> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks,
>> >>> Scott O'Bryan
>> >>>
>> >>> [1]
>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-072
>> >>> [2]
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-072/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.1/trinidad-2.0.1-source-release.zip
>> >>> [3]
>> >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-2.0.1
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jakob Korherr
>>
>> blog: http://www.jakobk.com
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr
>> work: http://www.irian.at
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] legal files in WARs like samples etc
Posted by Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>.
+1
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2011/9/19 Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com>
> +1
>
> Regards,
> Jakob
>
> 2011/9/19 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
> > Hi folks!
> >
> >
> > I'm pretty sure this doesn't only hit Trinidad but also a lot other
> projects, so I like to trigger a discussion on this very topic.
> >
> > Usually we only ship JAR files, and the code in apache-parent should make
> sure that each file properly contains LICENSE and NOTICE files.
> > Of course such a mechanism doesn't exist for WAR files which we ship for
> samples and stuff. With shipping WAR files there are 2 problematic issues
> >
> > 1.) those must contain LICENSE and NOTICE files. See the mail below how
> to solve this.
> >
> > 2.) we might also 'distribute' (in a legal sense) 3-rd party JAR files
> inside of the WARs WEB-INF/lib directory!
> > This is a bummer, and in OWB, we completely disabled the deployment of
> our samples via maven because of that!
> > You can get the sources in the source-distribution.zip, you can build it
> yourself, etc. But we don't ship any 3rd party JARs which are not developed
> inside the ASF this way.
> >
> > Why is this problematic: OWB for example needs javassist which is MPL
> licensed. MPL is perfectly fine as dependency as a lot other CategoryA and
> CategoryB licensed projects are[1]. But MPL needs certain attribution when
> you _distribute_ the project!
> >
> > WDYT? Is this feasible or MyFaces too?
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> > [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
> >
> >
> > ----- Forwarded Message -----
> >> From: Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> >> To: MyFaces Development <de...@myfaces.apache.org>
> >> Cc:
> >> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 10:50 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad 2.0.1
> >>
> >> Hi Scott!
> >>
> >> I'm sorry, but I fear I have to veto with a -1.
> >>
> >> trinidad-components-showcase.war (WAR!)
> >>
> >> has no NOTICE nor LICENSE files I could find.
> >>
> >> I know we shipped lots of WAR files in the past without those, but I
> only
> >> recently became aware of this problem in OpenWebBeans where I had to
> re-roll my
> >> release too.
> >>
> >> This can easily get fixed by doing some packaging tricks
> >> Please see the maven-war-plugin config of the OWB samples
> >>
> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/samples/pom.xml
> >>
> >> The important part is
> >> <webResources> <resource> <directory>.</directory>
> >> <targetPath>META-INF</targetPath> <includes>
> >> <include>LICENSE</include> <include>NOTICE</include>
> >> </includes> </resource> </webResources>
> >>
> >> Otherwise the release looks fine so far.
> >>
> >>
> >> txs LieGrue,
> >> strub
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>
> >>> To: dev@myfaces.apache.org
> >>> Cc:
> >>> Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2011 2:38 AM
> >>> Subject: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad 2.0.1
> >>>
> >>> Hi Everyone,
> >>>
> >>> I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.1 release out
> and
> >> now I
> >>> need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not. I have
> committed
> >> most
> >>> of the most recent submitted patches and things look to be fairly
> stable.
> >> There
> >>> are a few patches outstanding, but I wanted to put those into trunk so
> that
> >> they
> >>> can get some more testing.
> >>>
> >>> Therefore, I would like to ask for a vote on this release. All of the
> >> following
> >>> should be ready for review:
> >>>
> >>> * The generated repository and assembly artifacts [1]
> >>> * The generated source archive [2]
> >>> * The updated svn repository [3]
> >>>
> >>> Please review the artifacts and vote according to the following:
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------------------------
> >>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> >>> [ ] +0
> >>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
> released,
> >>> and why..............
> >>> ------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Scott O'Bryan
> >>>
> >>> [1]
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-072
> >>> [2]
> >>>
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-072/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.1/trinidad-2.0.1-source-release.zip
> >>> [3]
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-2.0.1
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Jakob Korherr
>
> blog: http://www.jakobk.com
> twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr
> work: http://www.irian.at
>
Re: [DISCUSS] legal files in WARs like samples etc
Posted by Jakob Korherr <ja...@gmail.com>.
+1
Regards,
Jakob
2011/9/19 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
> Hi folks!
>
>
> I'm pretty sure this doesn't only hit Trinidad but also a lot other projects, so I like to trigger a discussion on this very topic.
>
> Usually we only ship JAR files, and the code in apache-parent should make sure that each file properly contains LICENSE and NOTICE files.
> Of course such a mechanism doesn't exist for WAR files which we ship for samples and stuff. With shipping WAR files there are 2 problematic issues
>
> 1.) those must contain LICENSE and NOTICE files. See the mail below how to solve this.
>
> 2.) we might also 'distribute' (in a legal sense) 3-rd party JAR files inside of the WARs WEB-INF/lib directory!
> This is a bummer, and in OWB, we completely disabled the deployment of our samples via maven because of that!
> You can get the sources in the source-distribution.zip, you can build it yourself, etc. But we don't ship any 3rd party JARs which are not developed inside the ASF this way.
>
> Why is this problematic: OWB for example needs javassist which is MPL licensed. MPL is perfectly fine as dependency as a lot other CategoryA and CategoryB licensed projects are[1]. But MPL needs certain attribution when you _distribute_ the project!
>
> WDYT? Is this feasible or MyFaces too?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> [1] http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
>
>
> ----- Forwarded Message -----
>> From: Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>> To: MyFaces Development <de...@myfaces.apache.org>
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 10:50 AM
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad 2.0.1
>>
>> Hi Scott!
>>
>> I'm sorry, but I fear I have to veto with a -1.
>>
>> trinidad-components-showcase.war (WAR!)
>>
>> has no NOTICE nor LICENSE files I could find.
>>
>> I know we shipped lots of WAR files in the past without those, but I only
>> recently became aware of this problem in OpenWebBeans where I had to re-roll my
>> release too.
>>
>> This can easily get fixed by doing some packaging tricks
>> Please see the maven-war-plugin config of the OWB samples
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/samples/pom.xml
>>
>> The important part is
>> <webResources> <resource> <directory>.</directory>
>> <targetPath>META-INF</targetPath> <includes>
>> <include>LICENSE</include> <include>NOTICE</include>
>> </includes> </resource> </webResources>
>>
>> Otherwise the release looks fine so far.
>>
>>
>> txs LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>
>>> To: dev@myfaces.apache.org
>>> Cc:
>>> Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2011 2:38 AM
>>> Subject: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad 2.0.1
>>>
>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>
>>> I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.1 release out and
>> now I
>>> need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not. I have committed
>> most
>>> of the most recent submitted patches and things look to be fairly stable.
>> There
>>> are a few patches outstanding, but I wanted to put those into trunk so that
>> they
>>> can get some more testing.
>>>
>>> Therefore, I would like to ask for a vote on this release. All of the
>> following
>>> should be ready for review:
>>>
>>> * The generated repository and assembly artifacts [1]
>>> * The generated source archive [2]
>>> * The updated svn repository [3]
>>>
>>> Please review the artifacts and vote according to the following:
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>>> [ ] +0
>>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
>>> and why..............
>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Scott O'Bryan
>>>
>>> [1] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-072
>>> [2]
>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-072/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.1/trinidad-2.0.1-source-release.zip
>>> [3] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-2.0.1
>>>
>>
>
--
Jakob Korherr
blog: http://www.jakobk.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/jakobkorherr
work: http://www.irian.at
[DISCUSS] legal files in WARs like samples etc
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
Hi folks!
I'm pretty sure this doesn't only hit Trinidad but also a lot other projects, so I like to trigger a discussion on this very topic.
Usually we only ship JAR files, and the code in apache-parent should make sure that each file properly contains LICENSE and NOTICE files.
Of course such a mechanism doesn't exist for WAR files which we ship for samples and stuff. With shipping WAR files there are 2 problematic issues
1.) those must contain LICENSE and NOTICE files. See the mail below how to solve this.
2.) we might also 'distribute' (in a legal sense) 3-rd party JAR files inside of the WARs WEB-INF/lib directory!
This is a bummer, and in OWB, we completely disabled the deployment of our samples via maven because of that!
You can get the sources in the source-distribution.zip, you can build it yourself, etc. But we don't ship any 3rd party JARs which are not developed inside the ASF this way.
Why is this problematic: OWB for example needs javassist which is MPL licensed. MPL is perfectly fine as dependency as a lot other CategoryA and CategoryB licensed projects are[1]. But MPL needs certain attribution when you _distribute_ the project!
WDYT? Is this feasible or MyFaces too?
LieGrue,
strub
[1] http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
----- Forwarded Message -----
> From: Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> To: MyFaces Development <de...@myfaces.apache.org>
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 10:50 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad 2.0.1
>
> Hi Scott!
>
> I'm sorry, but I fear I have to veto with a -1.
>
> trinidad-components-showcase.war (WAR!)
>
> has no NOTICE nor LICENSE files I could find.
>
> I know we shipped lots of WAR files in the past without those, but I only
> recently became aware of this problem in OpenWebBeans where I had to re-roll my
> release too.
>
> This can easily get fixed by doing some packaging tricks
> Please see the maven-war-plugin config of the OWB samples
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/samples/pom.xml
>
> The important part is
> <webResources> <resource> <directory>.</directory>
> <targetPath>META-INF</targetPath> <includes>
> <include>LICENSE</include> <include>NOTICE</include>
> </includes> </resource> </webResources>
>
> Otherwise the release looks fine so far.
>
>
> txs LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>
>> To: dev@myfaces.apache.org
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2011 2:38 AM
>> Subject: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad 2.0.1
>>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.1 release out and
> now I
>> need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not. I have committed
> most
>> of the most recent submitted patches and things look to be fairly stable.
> There
>> are a few patches outstanding, but I wanted to put those into trunk so that
> they
>> can get some more testing.
>>
>> Therefore, I would like to ask for a vote on this release. All of the
> following
>> should be ready for review:
>>
>> * The generated repository and assembly artifacts [1]
>> * The generated source archive [2]
>> * The updated svn repository [3]
>>
>> Please review the artifacts and vote according to the following:
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------
>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
>> and why..............
>> ------------------------------------------------
>>
>> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Scott O'Bryan
>>
>> [1] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-072
>> [2]
>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-072/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.1/trinidad-2.0.1-source-release.zip
>> [3] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-2.0.1
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad 2.0.1
Posted by Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>.
Doh!! Mark, that is an awesome catch. That's a relatively new
sub-project and I didn't catch the missing listence files. I'll
change those tonight and send out a new vote email.
Scott
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 19, 2011, at 2:51 AM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> Hi Scott!
>
> I'm sorry, but I fear I have to veto with a -1.
>
> trinidad-components-showcase.war (WAR!)
>
> has no NOTICE nor LICENSE files I could find.
>
> I know we shipped lots of WAR files in the past without those, but I only recently became aware of this problem in OpenWebBeans where I had to re-roll my release too.
>
> This can easily get fixed by doing some packaging tricks
> Please see the maven-war-plugin config of the OWB samples
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/samples/pom.xml
>
> The important part is
> <webResources> <resource> <directory>.</directory> <targetPath>META-INF</targetPath> <includes> <include>LICENSE</include> <include>NOTICE</include> </includes> </resource> </webResources>
>
> Otherwise the release looks fine so far.
>
>
> txs LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>
>> To: dev@myfaces.apache.org
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2011 2:38 AM
>> Subject: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad 2.0.1
>>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.1 release out and now I
>> need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not. I have committed most
>> of the most recent submitted patches and things look to be fairly stable. There
>> are a few patches outstanding, but I wanted to put those into trunk so that they
>> can get some more testing.
>>
>> Therefore, I would like to ask for a vote on this release. All of the following
>> should be ready for review:
>>
>> * The generated repository and assembly artifacts [1]
>> * The generated source archive [2]
>> * The updated svn repository [3]
>>
>> Please review the artifacts and vote according to the following:
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------
>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
>> and why..............
>> ------------------------------------------------
>>
>> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Scott O'Bryan
>>
>> [1] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-072
>> [2]
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-072/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.1/trinidad-2.0.1-source-release.zip
>> [3] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-2.0.1
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad 2.0.1
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
Hi Scott!
I'm sorry, but I fear I have to veto with a -1.
trinidad-components-showcase.war (WAR!)
has no NOTICE nor LICENSE files I could find.
I know we shipped lots of WAR files in the past without those, but I only recently became aware of this problem in OpenWebBeans where I had to re-roll my release too.
This can easily get fixed by doing some packaging tricks
Please see the maven-war-plugin config of the OWB samples
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/trunk/samples/pom.xml
The important part is
<webResources> <resource> <directory>.</directory> <targetPath>META-INF</targetPath> <includes> <include>LICENSE</include> <include>NOTICE</include> </includes> </resource> </webResources>
Otherwise the release looks fine so far.
txs LieGrue,
strub
----- Original Message -----
> From: Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@myfaces.apache.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2011 2:38 AM
> Subject: [VOTE] Release of Trinidad 2.0.1
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I was running the tasks needed to get the Trinidad 2.0.1 release out and now I
> need a vote as to whether everything looks good or not. I have committed most
> of the most recent submitted patches and things look to be fairly stable. There
> are a few patches outstanding, but I wanted to put those into trunk so that they
> can get some more testing.
>
> Therefore, I would like to ask for a vote on this release. All of the following
> should be ready for review:
>
> * The generated repository and assembly artifacts [1]
> * The generated source archive [2]
> * The updated svn repository [3]
>
> Please review the artifacts and vote according to the following:
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
> and why..............
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Thanks,
> Scott O'Bryan
>
> [1] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-072
> [2]
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemyfaces-072/org/apache/myfaces/trinidad/trinidad/2.0.1/trinidad-2.0.1-source-release.zip
> [3] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/tags/trinidad-2.0.1
>