You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org by Christian Geisert <ch...@isu-gmbh.de> on 2004/03/01 11:57:00 UTC
Re: Wiki Migration and other issues
J.Pietschmann wrote:
> Hi all,
> now that the ASF has its new Wiki farm up and running,
> they pester everyone with moving from UseModWiki
> http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?HomePage
> to the MoinMoinWiki:
> http://wiki.apache.org/general
>
> Should we wait for the Apache XML reorganization to
> complete or should we rush ahead and create out own
> Wiki already?
+1 for the new wiki
It has a nicer look, supports XML export and we can have 'commit
messages' to fop-cvs
Christian
Re: Wiki Migration and other issues
Posted by "Peter B. West" <pb...@powerup.com.au>.
Christian Geisert wrote:
> Christian Geisert wrote:
>
>> J.Pietschmann wrote:
>
>
> [..]
>
>>> Should we wait for the Apache XML reorganization to
>>> complete or should we rush ahead and create out own
>>> Wiki already?
>>
>>
>> +1 for the new wiki
>> It has a nicer look, supports XML export and we can have 'commit
>> messages' to fop-cvs
>
>
> Others opinions?
>
> Considering this a strong recommendation from infrastructure
> I'd say we migrate to the new wiki (of course if there are no -1s)
> There's a tool for automatic converting content from the old wiki
> and if this doesn't work I'll volunteer to do it manually.
Ok by me. From what I've seen on infrastructure@, there may be some
post-conversion tidying to do.
+1
Peter
--
Peter B. West <http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/resume.html>
Re: Wiki Migration and other issues
Posted by Clay Leeds <cl...@medata.com>.
On Mar 4, 2004, at 9:20 AM, Clay Leeds wrote:
> [2]
> http://wiki.apache.org/general
BTW, I might add, that we're not the first... It seems[1] that
Xindice[2] also has a MoinMoinWiki...
[1]
http://wiki.apache.org/xindice
[2]
http://xml.apache.org/xindice
RE: Wiki Migration and other issues
Posted by "Andreas L. Delmelle" <a_...@pandora.be>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Clay Leeds [mailto:cleeds@medata.com]
>
<snip />
> Sounds good to me... Looks 'snappier'! (sorry! ;-) and the added
> capabilities[1] look promising. There're a couple of other Wiki's I'm
I also had a look, and apparently, the bottom-part (below 5. Contact...) of
the page is displayed localized (in Dutch from here) while all the rest of
the page displays in English.
Apart from this minor detail, it indeed looks much cooler than the previous,
so my blessing for this.
Cheers,
Andreas
Re: Wiki Migration and other issues
Posted by Clay Leeds <cl...@medata.com>.
On Mar 4, 2004, at 9:01 AM, Christian Geisert wrote:
> Christian Geisert wrote:
>> J.Pietschmann wrote:
> [..]
>>> Should we wait for the Apache XML reorganization to
>>> complete or should we rush ahead and create out own
>>> Wiki already?
>> +1 for the new wiki
>> It has a nicer look, supports XML export and we can have 'commit
>> messages' to fop-cvs
>
> Others opinions?
>
> Considering this a strong recommendation from infrastructure
> I'd say we migrate to the new wiki (of course if there are no -1s)
> There's a tool for automatic converting content from the old wiki
> and if this doesn't work I'll volunteer to do it manually.
>
> Christian
Sounds good to me... Looks 'snappier'! (sorry! ;-) and the added
capabilities[1] look promising. There're a couple of other Wiki's I'm
involved with I'd like to have upgraded to MoinMoinWiki as well.
Anyway, this looks like a nice move to me, especially since it looks
like the Apache General Wiki[2] has moved to MoinMoinWiki as well...
[1]
http://moinmoin.wikiwikiweb.de/MoinMoinFeatures
[2]
http://wiki.apache.org/general
Re: Wiki Migration and other issues
Posted by Christian Geisert <ch...@isu-gmbh.de>.
Christian Geisert wrote:
> J.Pietschmann wrote:
[..]
>> Should we wait for the Apache XML reorganization to
>> complete or should we rush ahead and create out own
>> Wiki already?
>
> +1 for the new wiki
> It has a nicer look, supports XML export and we can have 'commit
> messages' to fop-cvs
Others opinions?
Considering this a strong recommendation from infrastructure
I'd say we migrate to the new wiki (of course if there are no -1s)
There's a tool for automatic converting content from the old wiki
and if this doesn't work I'll volunteer to do it manually.
Christian