You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@flex.apache.org by Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com> on 2013/02/20 10:04:58 UTC
Is flex2.compiler.swc.SwcGroup part of Apache Flex or Flash Builder
?
Because unless I set
-Djava.util.Arrays.useLegacyMergeSort=true
I get:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Comparison method violates its
general contract!
at java.util.TimSort.mergeHi(Unknown Source)
at java.util.TimSort.mergeAt(Unknown Source)
at java.util.TimSort.mergeCollapse(Unknown Source)
at java.util.TimSort.sort(Unknown Source)
at java.util.TimSort.sort(Unknown Source)
at java.util.Arrays.sort(Unknown Source)
at flex2.compiler.swc.SwcGroup.updateMaps(SwcGroup.java:281)
at flex2.compiler.swc.SwcGroup.<init>(SwcGroup.java:67)
at flex2.compiler.swc.SwcCache.getSwcGroup(SwcCache.java:109)
at flex2.compiler.swc.SwcCache.getSwcGroup(SwcCache.java:91)
at flex2.compiler.CompilerSwcContext.load(CompilerSwcContext.java:96)
during compiles in Flash Builder, but I can't believe everyone has to
set this property...
--
extravision Signature
*Tom Chiverton* | Lead Developer | Extravision
*T:* 0161 817 2922 | *W:* www.extravision.com
<http://www.extravision.com> | *T:* twitter.com/extravision
<http://twitter.com/extravision> | *E:* tchiverton@extravision.com
<ma...@extravision.com>
.
.
A fresh approach to email marketing
.
Registered in the UK at : 107 Timber Wharf, 33 Worsley Street,
Manchester, M15 4LD. Registration number: 05017214 VAT: GB 824 5386 19
Disclaimer: This e-mail is intended solely for the person to whom it is
addressed and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you
have received it in error please notify us immediately and destroy this
e-mail and any attachments. In addition, you must not disclose, copy,
distribute or take any action in reliance on this e-mail or any
attachments. Any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely
of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Extravision Ltd.
E-mail may be susceptible to data corruption, interception, unauthorised
amendment, viruses and delays or the consequences thereof. Accordingly,
this e-mail and any attachments are opened at your own risk.
Re: Is flex2.compiler.swc.SwcGroup part of Apache Flex or Flash
Builder ?
Posted by Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com>.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2062020/how-can-i-tell-if-im-running-in-64-bit-jvm-or-32-bit-jvm
claims sun.arch.data.model should work, and both are 32bit.
Tom
||
|
|
On 20/02/2013 15:05, Timothy Jones wrote:
> I don't know what to tell you, other than maybe change the program to output ALL of the System.getProperties(), and go on a fishing expedition. Surely something will be an indicator!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Chiverton [mailto:tc@extravision.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 9:35 AM
> To: users@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Is flex2.compiler.swc.SwcGroup part of Apache Flex or Flash Builder ?
>
> My 1.6 and 1.7 both say just 'Java HostSpot(TM) Client VM'.
>
> Tom
>
> On 20/02/2013 14:23, Timothy Jones wrote:
>> public class version {
>> public static void main(String args[]) {
>> System.out.println(System.getProperty("java.vm.name"));
>> }
>> }
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
>
RE: Is flex2.compiler.swc.SwcGroup part of Apache Flex or Flash
Builder ?
Posted by Timothy Jones <Ti...@syniverse.com>.
I don't know what to tell you, other than maybe change the program to output ALL of the System.getProperties(), and go on a fishing expedition. Surely something will be an indicator!
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Chiverton [mailto:tc@extravision.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 9:35 AM
To: users@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is flex2.compiler.swc.SwcGroup part of Apache Flex or Flash Builder ?
My 1.6 and 1.7 both say just 'Java HostSpot(TM) Client VM'.
Tom
On 20/02/2013 14:23, Timothy Jones wrote:
> public class version {
> public static void main(String args[]) {
> System.out.println(System.getProperty("java.vm.name"));
> }
> }
Re: Is flex2.compiler.swc.SwcGroup part of Apache Flex or Flash
Builder ?
Posted by Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com>.
My 1.6 and 1.7 both say just 'Java HostSpot(TM) Client VM'.
Tom
On 20/02/2013 14:23, Timothy Jones wrote:
> public class version {
> public static void main(String args[]) {
> System.out.println(System.getProperty("java.vm.name"));
> }
> }
RE: Is flex2.compiler.swc.SwcGroup part of Apache Flex or Flash
Builder ?
Posted by Timothy Jones <Ti...@syniverse.com>.
Create a version.java file.
public class version {
public static void main(String args[]) {
System.out.println(System.getProperty("java.vm.name"));
}
}
Compile:
C:\>javac version.java
Run:
C:\>java version
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM
C:\>
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Chiverton [mailto:tc@extravision.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 8:40 AM
To: users@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is flex2.compiler.swc.SwcGroup part of Apache Flex or Flash Builder ?
I don't think so. How can I tell a given JVM is 32bit or not ?
The -version argument seems silent on the matter for both my 1.7 and 1.6 installs.
Tom
On 20/02/2013 12:14, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Have things changed since August when 1.7 wasn't supported then ?
> Java 1.7 was used to create the 4.9.0 release.
>
>> Still, knowing that, I swapped my Eclipse to 1.6 (end of life in a
>> week not withstanding !) and it's now twice as fast and two thirds
>> the RAM usage, as well as compiling fine :-)
> Just a guess but might be more a 32 bit vs 64 bit issue than 1.6 vs 1.7?
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
>
Re: Is flex2.compiler.swc.SwcGroup part of Apache Flex or Flash
Builder ?
Posted by Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com>.
I don't think so. How can I tell a given JVM is 32bit or not ?
The -version argument seems silent on the matter for both my 1.7 and 1.6
installs.
Tom
On 20/02/2013 12:14, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> Have things changed since August when 1.7 wasn't supported then ?
> Java 1.7 was used to create the 4.9.0 release.
>
>> Still, knowing that, I swapped my Eclipse to 1.6 (end of life in a week not withstanding !) and it's now twice as fast and two thirds the RAM usage, as well as compiling fine :-)
> Just a guess but might be more a 32 bit vs 64 bit issue than 1.6 vs 1.7?
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
>
Re: Is flex2.compiler.swc.SwcGroup part of Apache Flex or Flash Builder ?
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> Have things changed since August when 1.7 wasn't supported then ?
Java 1.7 was used to create the 4.9.0 release.
> Still, knowing that, I swapped my Eclipse to 1.6 (end of life in a week not withstanding !) and it's now twice as fast and two thirds the RAM usage, as well as compiling fine :-)
Just a guess but might be more a 32 bit vs 64 bit issue than 1.6 vs 1.7?
Thanks,
Justin
Re: Is flex2.compiler.swc.SwcGroup part of Apache Flex or Flash
Builder ?
Posted by Tom Chiverton <tc...@extravision.com>.
Have things changed since August when 1.7 wasn't supported then ?
Still, knowing that, I swapped my Eclipse to 1.6 (end of life in a week
not withstanding !) and it's now twice as fast and two thirds the RAM
usage, as well as compiling fine :-)
On 20/02/2013 09:21, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> during compiles in Flash Builder, but I can't believe everyone has to set this property...
> I think by default FB uses Java 1.6 and this issue only occurs when using Java 1.7 with FB.
>
> Apache Flex can compile under Java 1.7 so there are no issues there.
>
> Perhaps add/watch/vote for:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33155
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
>
Re: Is flex2.compiler.swc.SwcGroup part of Apache Flex or Flash Builder ?
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> during compiles in Flash Builder, but I can't believe everyone has to set this property...
I think by default FB uses Java 1.6 and this issue only occurs when using Java 1.7 with FB.
Apache Flex can compile under Java 1.7 so there are no issues there.
Perhaps add/watch/vote for:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33155
Thanks,
Justin