You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tika.apache.org by "Dave Meikle (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/01/15 11:51:01 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (TIKA-2509) TesseractOCRParser ignores configured ImageMagickPath in processImage method

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16326160#comment-16326160 ] 

Dave Meikle commented on TIKA-2509:
-----------------------------------

Created new improvement ticket for the Python path configuration noted in this ticket

> TesseractOCRParser ignores configured ImageMagickPath in processImage method
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TIKA-2509
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2509
>             Project: Tika
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: ocr
>    Affects Versions: 1.16, 1.17
>            Reporter: Richard Jones
>            Assignee: Dave Meikle
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.18
>
>
> The TesseractOCRParser class uses the configured ImageMagickPath in method hasImageMagick to determine whether ImageMagick is present.  Ref:
> String ImageMagick = config.getImageMagickPath() + getImageMagickProg();
> BUT then completely ignores the configured path in the processImage method meaning ImageMagick has to be present on system path (so what's the point of the ImageMagickPath config setting).
> The doOCR method on the other hand DOES use the configured tesseractPath.
> Incidentally I notice there is no equivalent PythonPath config setting even though Python is attempted to be found/used.
> Some consistency would be appreciated so that ImageMagick and Python don't have to be present on the system path.  i.e. follow the model already in place for finding/using Tesseract.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)