You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@beam.apache.org by "Chamikara Jayalath (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/08/22 19:52:00 UTC
[jira] [Assigned] (BEAM-8023) Allow specifying BigQuery Storage API
readOptions at runtime
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Chamikara Jayalath reassigned BEAM-8023:
----------------------------------------
Assignee: Kenneth Jung
> Allow specifying BigQuery Storage API readOptions at runtime
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BEAM-8023
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8023
> Project: Beam
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: io-java-gcp
> Reporter: Jeff Klukas
> Assignee: Kenneth Jung
> Priority: Minor
> Time Spent: 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> We have support in the Java SDK for using the BigQuery Storage API for reads, but only the target query or table is supported as a ValueProvider to be specified at runtime. AFAICT, there is no reason we can't delay specifying readOptions until runtime as well.
> The readOptions are accessed by BigQueryStorageTableSource in getTargetTable; I believe that's occurring at runtime, but I'd love for someone with deeper BoundedSource knowledge to confirm that.
> I'd advocate for adding new methods `TypedRead.withSelectedFields(ValueProvider<List<String>> value)` and `TypedRead.withRowRestriction(ValueProvider<String> value)`. The existing `withReadOptions` method would then populate the other two as StaticValueProviders. Perhaps we'd want to deprecate `withReadOptions` in favor or specifying individual read options as separate parameters.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)