You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@phoenix.apache.org by Thomas D'Silva <td...@salesforce.com.INVALID> on 2019/05/10 20:28:56 UTC
[DISCUSS] Drop support for HBase-1.2
Since HBase 1.2 is now end of life and we are creating a new branch to
support HBase-1.5(PHOENIX-5277), I think we should drop the HBase-1.2
branches. What do folks think?
Thanks,
Thomas
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop support for HBase-1.2
Posted by Thomas D'Silva <td...@salesforce.com.INVALID>.
I think we have consensus, we can stop committing to the 1.2 branches from
now on.
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 10:31 AM Vincent Poon <vi...@apache.org>
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 8:18 PM Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > I would think it would be a drain on committer time to keep having to
> > accommodate interface differences on the EOL line.
> >
> > > On May 10, 2019, at 1:28 PM, Thomas D'Silva <tdsilva@salesforce.com
> .invalid>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Since HBase 1.2 is now end of life and we are creating a new branch to
> > > support HBase-1.5(PHOENIX-5277), I think we should drop the HBase-1.2
> > > branches. What do folks think?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Thomas
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop support for HBase-1.2
Posted by "larsh@apache.org" <la...@apache.org>.
+1
On Monday, May 13, 2019, 1:31:35 PM EDT, Vincent Poon <vi...@apache.org> wrote:
+1
On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 8:18 PM Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1
>
> I would think it would be a drain on committer time to keep having to
> accommodate interface differences on the EOL line.
>
> > On May 10, 2019, at 1:28 PM, Thomas D'Silva <td...@salesforce.com.invalid>
> wrote:
> >
> > Since HBase 1.2 is now end of life and we are creating a new branch to
> > support HBase-1.5(PHOENIX-5277), I think we should drop the HBase-1.2
> > branches. What do folks think?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Thomas
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop support for HBase-1.2
Posted by Vincent Poon <vi...@apache.org>.
+1
On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 8:18 PM Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1
>
> I would think it would be a drain on committer time to keep having to
> accommodate interface differences on the EOL line.
>
> > On May 10, 2019, at 1:28 PM, Thomas D'Silva <td...@salesforce.com.invalid>
> wrote:
> >
> > Since HBase 1.2 is now end of life and we are creating a new branch to
> > support HBase-1.5(PHOENIX-5277), I think we should drop the HBase-1.2
> > branches. What do folks think?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Thomas
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop support for HBase-1.2
Posted by Andrew Purtell <an...@gmail.com>.
+1
I would think it would be a drain on committer time to keep having to accommodate interface differences on the EOL line.
> On May 10, 2019, at 1:28 PM, Thomas D'Silva <td...@salesforce.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> Since HBase 1.2 is now end of life and we are creating a new branch to
> support HBase-1.5(PHOENIX-5277), I think we should drop the HBase-1.2
> branches. What do folks think?
>
> Thanks,
> Thomas
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop support for HBase-1.2
Posted by Ankit Singhal <an...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 4:44 PM Josh Elser <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> On 5/10/19 4:28 PM, Thomas D'Silva wrote:
> > Since HBase 1.2 is now end of life and we are creating a new branch to
> > support HBase-1.5(PHOENIX-5277), I think we should drop the HBase-1.2
> > branches. What do folks think?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Thomas
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop support for HBase-1.2
Posted by Josh Elser <el...@apache.org>.
+1
On 5/10/19 4:28 PM, Thomas D'Silva wrote:
> Since HBase 1.2 is now end of life and we are creating a new branch to
> support HBase-1.5(PHOENIX-5277), I think we should drop the HBase-1.2
> branches. What do folks think?
>
> Thanks,
> Thomas
>