James in production

[math math <ma...@gmail.com>]

Hello,

I would like to use James3 in production and i have few questions about it :

What are advantages to use James v3 vs James v2?

Does anybody uses James Beta3 in production already? Is it stable enough or
better use James 2.3.2?

When will final stable James 3 be released?

Thanks,
Mat.

Re: James in production

[Zach Cox <zc...@gmail.com>]

We've been running james3 in production for several months now. Had a
few issues but they turned out to be due to errors in our matchers,
mailets & config. Otherwise it's been working great.

Also did load testing last summer, pushing 20+ emails/sec each with
1MB attachment into james3 and could not get it to break.


On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 2:37 AM, Pavlos Georgiadis <pa...@georgiadis.eu> wrote:
> IMHO the main advantages are support for IMAP and "native" support for
> virtual users/domains.
>
> I don't think it is stable enough for production yet. I run an instance
> of james3 as a pilot for 2 domains on my server. But the rest of the
> domains that my box serves are on a 2.3.2 instance.
>
>
> On 25/01/2012 10:25, math math wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would like to use James3 in production and i have few questions about it :
>>
>> What are advantages to use James v3 vs James v2?
>>
>> Does anybody uses James Beta3 in production already? Is it stable enough or
>> better use James 2.3.2?
>>
>> When will final stable James 3 be released?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mat.
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-user-help@james.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-user-help@james.apache.org

Re: James in production

[Pavlos Georgiadis <pa...@georgiadis.eu>]

IMHO the main advantages are support for IMAP and "native" support for
virtual users/domains.

I don't think it is stable enough for production yet. I run an instance
of james3 as a pilot for 2 domains on my server. But the rest of the
domains that my box serves are on a 2.3.2 instance.


On 25/01/2012 10:25, math math wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to use James3 in production and i have few questions about it :
>
> What are advantages to use James v3 vs James v2?
>
> Does anybody uses James Beta3 in production already? Is it stable enough or
> better use James 2.3.2?
>
> When will final stable James 3 be released?
>
> Thanks,
> Mat.
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-user-help@james.apache.org