You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ambari.apache.org by "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/05/29 14:55:17 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (AMBARI-11528) AlertReceivedListener produces
large number of db requests
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-11528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14564735#comment-14564735 ]
Hadoop QA commented on AMBARI-11528:
------------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12736115/AMBARI-11528.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:red}-1 patch{color}. Top-level trunk compilation may be broken.
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/Ambari-trunk-test-patch/2923//console
This message is automatically generated.
> AlertReceivedListener produces large number of db requests
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMBARI-11528
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-11528
> Project: Ambari
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: ambari-server
> Affects Versions: 2.1.0
> Reporter: Dmytro Sen
> Assignee: Dmytro Sen
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 2.1.0
>
> Attachments: AMBARI-11528.patch
>
>
> In 5-min snapshot processing of onAlertEvent method took ~94 seconds producing 46k commits and almost same amount of db requests (~equally split between alert_history and alert_definition tables)
> this can be related to large amount to alerts, but it should be addressed as we can have even more alerts on larger clusters, and it can be caused by a single thread only for all listeners, so there's possible bottleneck here.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)