[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1974) BooleanQuery can not find all matches in special condition

["Michael McCandless (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765299#action_12765299 ] 

Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1974:
--------------------------------------------

Hmm... seems to be a bug in BooleanScorer... if you call static BooleanQuery.setAllowDocsOutOfOrder(false) the test passes (so that's a viable workaround it seems).

> BooleanQuery can not find all matches in special condition
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1974
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Query/Scoring
>    Affects Versions: 2.9
>            Reporter: tangfulin
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>         Attachments: BooleanQueryTest.java, LUCENE-1974.test.patch, LUCENE-1974.test.patch
>
>
> query: (name:tang*)
> doc=5137 score=1.0  doc:Document<stored,indexed<name:tangfulin>>
> doc=11377 score=1.0  doc:Document<stored,indexed<name:tangfulin>>
> query: name:tang* name:notexistnames
> doc=5137 score=0.048133932  doc:Document<stored,indexed<name:tangfulin>>
> It is two queries on the same index, one is just a prefix query in a
> boolean query, and the other is a prefix query plus a term query in a
> boolean query, all with Occur.SHOULD .
> what I wonder is why the later query can not find the doc=11377 doc ?
> the problem can be repreduced by the code in the attachment .

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org