[jira] [Closed] (GEODE-1190) Should the LuceneServiceProvider get API take a GemFireCache instead of a Cache?

["Anthony Baker (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-1190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Anthony Baker closed GEODE-1190.
--------------------------------

> Should the LuceneServiceProvider get API take a GemFireCache instead of a Cache?
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GEODE-1190
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-1190
>             Project: Geode
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: lucene
>            Reporter: Barry Oglesby
>             Fix For: 1.2.0
>
>
> Should the LuceneServiceProvider get API take a GemFireCache instead of a Cache?
> The {{LuceneServiceProvider get}} API takes a {{Cache}} like:
> {noformat}
> public static LuceneService get(Cache cache)
> {noformat}
> If I create a {{ClientCache}}, I can't pass that into this method.
> Code like this doesn't compile:
> {noformat}
> ClientCache cache = new ClientCacheFactory().create();
> LuceneService luceneService = LuceneServiceProvider.get(cache);
> {noformat}
> Instead I have to cast the {{ClientCache}} to a {{Cache}}, but that doesn't seem right:
> {noformat}
> ClientCache clientCache = new ClientCacheFactory().create();
> LuceneService luceneService = LuceneServiceProvider.get((Cache) clientCache);
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)