You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com> on 2009/06/09 01:29:01 UTC
Re: svn commit: r729317 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual:
env.html.en env.xml mod/mod_cache.html.en mod/mod_cache.xml
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 5:35 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
<wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> -1; please stop committing documentation updates without introducing
> the appropriate compatibility notes!
>
> As this is already on our site, for an unreleased version, it looks
> particularly stupid.
2.2.x has the compatability note in env.xml but not in the text added
to CacheDisable. There is a see-also link from the latter to the
former.
Is adding the same compatability note to mod_cache.xml sufficient or
do you suggest something else?
Is there a trunk issue (the quoted change) re: compatability notes?
If so, can you elaborate?
--
Eric Covener
covener@gmail.com
Re: svn commit: r729317 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual:
env.html.en env.xml mod/mod_cache.html.en mod/mod_cache.xml
Posted by Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 7:37 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
<wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> Nope; As far as "2.4" documentation, there's really no need IMHO, but
> I guess it's nice for folks making a transition.
Spot-checking, looks like it's best to have/add it matching in trunk
for consistency.
--
Eric Covener
covener@gmail.com
Re: svn commit: r729317 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual: env.html.en
env.xml mod/mod_cache.html.en mod/mod_cache.xml
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
Eric Covener wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 5:35 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
> <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
>> -1; please stop committing documentation updates without introducing
>> the appropriate compatibility notes!
>>
>> As this is already on our site, for an unreleased version, it looks
>> particularly stupid.
>
> 2.2.x has the compatability note in env.xml but not in the text added
> to CacheDisable. There is a see-also link from the latter to the
> former.
>
> Is adding the same compatability note to mod_cache.xml sufficient or
> do you suggest something else?
Yes, adding this to mod_cache.xml would be sufficient.
> Is there a trunk issue (the quoted change) re: compatability notes?
> If so, can you elaborate?
Nope; As far as "2.4" documentation, there's really no need IMHO, but
I guess it's nice for folks making a transition.