You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@tomcat.apache.org by William Hovingh <wh...@whis.net> on 2001/09/28 17:18:56 UTC

Probable FAQ entry: Is Tomcat4+mod_webapp+Apache-1.3.xx ready for prime time?

My sysadmin and I are in the process of building a new web/app server to 
replace our existing installation.  It seems an opportune time to make 
the move upward in API and app server (i.e., to move from Tomcat3.2 to 
Catalina, hence moving to the recently released servlet and JSP specs).

However, my sysadmin had some difficulty building mod_webapp, and did 
not find a lot of documentation of the build process out there.  She has 
consequently asked me if I'm *sure* I want to use Catalina+mod_webapp 
with our Apache, "Since," as she says, "it's so new."

So, is it ready?  I'm pretty confident from what I've read that Catalina 
itself is stable, tested, and ready.  I'm a little unsure about 
mod_webapp and the Warp connector.  Pier, Henri, others: how "ready" are 
they?  Pier especially: is mod_webapp final, stable, or still beta?

(I *don't* mean these questions to sound critical of *anyone's* work 
here.  I just need a little more data before I go back to my sysadmin 
with a recommendation.)


RE: Probable FAQ entry: Is Tomcat4+mod_webapp+Apache-1.3.xx ready for prime time?

Posted by Rodrigo Reis <ro...@convex.pt>.
	Hello Rob:

	I'm using Apache 1.3.20 and the static pages work fine. I've disabled the
cache just to make sure that the pages are being served correctly. However,
I'm having a similar problem like yours with a different configuration. I
will post a mail to the list with the problem description soon.

	Best regards:

	Rodrigo Reis

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rob van swol [mailto:vanswol@nlr.nl]
> Sent: domingo, 30 de Setembro de 2001 15:19
> To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org; rodrigo@convex.pt
> Subject: Re: Probable FAQ entry: Is Tomcat4+mod_webapp+Apache-1.3.xx
> ready for prime time?
>
>
> Hello, Rodrigo,
>
> Does that mean that also the static pages (like for instance
> /examples/servlets/index.html) are served correctly by Apache? If so,
> are you sure that you don't see pages that are cached. So far, I only
> get the examples themselves working correctly, but not the static pages.
> (Tested with Apache 1.3.11 both on Linux and SGI Irix).
>
> Rob
>
> Rodrigo Reis wrote:
>
> > 	Hello William,
> >
> > 	If your platform is Linux you can find a binary of
> mod_webapp in this URL:
> >
> > http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0/bin/
> >
> > 	I'm using it and it seems OK.
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> _____________________________________________________________
>
> Rob W. van Swol
> National Aerospace Laboratory NLR       Tel. +31 527 248252
> P.O. Box 153                            Fax  +31 527 248210
> 8300 AD Emmeloord                       E-Mail vanswol@nlr.nl
> The Netherlands                         http://www.neonet.nl/
>


Re: Probable FAQ entry: Is Tomcat4+mod_webapp+Apache-1.3.xx ready for prime time?

Posted by rob van swol <va...@nlr.nl>.
Hello, Rodrigo,

Does that mean that also the static pages (like for instance 
/examples/servlets/index.html) are served correctly by Apache? If so, 
are you sure that you don't see pages that are cached. So far, I only 
get the examples themselves working correctly, but not the static pages. 
(Tested with Apache 1.3.11 both on Linux and SGI Irix).

Rob

Rodrigo Reis wrote:

> 	Hello William,
> 
> 	If your platform is Linux you can find a binary of mod_webapp in this URL:
> 
> http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0/bin/
> 
> 	I'm using it and it seems OK.
> 
>



-- 
_____________________________________________________________

Rob W. van Swol
National Aerospace Laboratory NLR       Tel. +31 527 248252
P.O. Box 153                            Fax  +31 527 248210
8300 AD Emmeloord                       E-Mail vanswol@nlr.nl
The Netherlands                         http://www.neonet.nl/


Re: Probable FAQ entry: Is Tomcat4+mod_webapp+Apache-1.3.xx ready for prime time?

Posted by William Hovingh <wh...@whis.net>.
> 	If your platform is Linux you can find a binary of mod_webapp in this URL:
> 
> http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0/bin/
> 
> 	I'm using it and it seems OK.

Thanks.  Regretfully, my platform is HP-UX, so a manual "build" of 
mod_webapp was required.

However, the information that it is working well for you is a good data 
point.


RE: Probable FAQ entry: Is Tomcat4+mod_webapp+Apache-1.3.xx ready for prime time?

Posted by Rodrigo Reis <ro...@convex.pt>.
	Hello William,

	If your platform is Linux you can find a binary of mod_webapp in this URL:

http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.0/bin/

	I'm using it and it seems OK.

	Best regards,

	Rodrigo Reis

> -----Original Message-----
> From: William Hovingh [mailto:whovingh@whis.net]
> Sent: sexta-feira, 28 de Setembro de 2001 16:19
> To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: Probable FAQ entry: Is Tomcat4+mod_webapp+Apache-1.3.xx ready
> for prime time?
> 
> 
> My sysadmin and I are in the process of building a new web/app server to 
> replace our existing installation.  It seems an opportune time to make 
> the move upward in API and app server (i.e., to move from Tomcat3.2 to 
> Catalina, hence moving to the recently released servlet and JSP specs).
> 
> However, my sysadmin had some difficulty building mod_webapp, and did 
> not find a lot of documentation of the build process out there.  She has 
> consequently asked me if I'm *sure* I want to use Catalina+mod_webapp 
> with our Apache, "Since," as she says, "it's so new."
> 
> So, is it ready?  I'm pretty confident from what I've read that Catalina 
> itself is stable, tested, and ready.  I'm a little unsure about 
> mod_webapp and the Warp connector.  Pier, Henri, others: how "ready" are 
> they?  Pier especially: is mod_webapp final, stable, or still beta?
> 
> (I *don't* mean these questions to sound critical of *anyone's* work 
> here.  I just need a little more data before I go back to my sysadmin 
> with a recommendation.)
>