[VOTE] Remove mod_ldap

[Ryan Bloom <rb...@covalent.net>]

It seems that most people on this list were surprised to see mod_ldap in
the core.  We all expected a small LDAP library in apr-util, and nothing
in the core.  Since there are at least two people who have mentioned that
they would have voted -1 for mod_ldap, can I get a vote to remove it now?

BTW,  +1 from me.

Ryan

______________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom				rbb@apache.org
Covalent Technologies			rbb@covalent.net
--------------------------------------------------------------

Re: [VOTE] Remove mod_ldap

[Graham Leggett <mi...@sharp.fm>]

Ryan Bloom wrote:

> It seems that most people on this list were surprised to see mod_ldap in
> the core.  We all expected a small LDAP library in apr-util, and nothing
> in the core.  Since there are at least two people who have mentioned that
> they would have voted -1 for mod_ldap, can I get a vote to remove it now?

At the same time it would be nice to get a final release strategy for
mod_ldap, mod_proxy and mod_ssl. It's been on the table for months now
without a conclusion.

I would vote (if I had one) +1 - with the provision that the release
strategy issue is hammered out and resolved soon.

Regards,
Graham
-- 
-----------------------------------------
minfrin@sharp.fm		"There's a moon
					over Bourbon Street
						tonight..."

Re: [VOTE] Remove mod_ldap

[Doug MacEachern <do...@covalent.net>]

On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:

> 
> It seems that most people on this list were surprised to see mod_ldap in
> the core.  We all expected a small LDAP library in apr-util, and nothing
> in the core.  Since there are at least two people who have mentioned that
> they would have voted -1 for mod_ldap, can I get a vote to remove it now?

+1 for moving it to an httpd-ldap subproject.

Re: [VOTE] Remove mod_ldap

["William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>]

From: "Cliff Woolley" <cl...@yahoo.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 8:42 AM


> On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> 
> > It seems that most people on this list were surprised to see mod_ldap in
> > the core.  We all expected a small LDAP library in apr-util, and nothing
> > in the core.  Since there are at least two people who have mentioned that
> > they would have voted -1 for mod_ldap, can I get a vote to remove it now?
> >
> > BTW,  +1 from me.
> 
> +0 to remove it from the core.  I don't mind having a small ldap blob in
> apr-util, though, and I'm +1 for having an httpd-ldap repository set up to
> house mod_ldap.

Had the mod_ldap proposal been submitted as a discrete message, instead of
being completely entangled in the apr-util discussion, I would have (and am
now voting) +1 to introduce an httpd-ldap sub-project.  I would have vetoed 
the introduction into our core httpd-2.0 cvs.  So I vote +1 to remove it
and introduce the subproject instead.

This was really 'snuck through' - in that there was never a clear 
(and seperate) vote to introduce mod_ldap.  I'm not irritated by it, but
I'd like to see this made right by and acceptable to the entire group.

Bill

Re: [VOTE] Remove mod_ldap

[Cliff Woolley <cl...@yahoo.com>]

On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:

> It seems that most people on this list were surprised to see mod_ldap in
> the core.  We all expected a small LDAP library in apr-util, and nothing
> in the core.  Since there are at least two people who have mentioned that
> they would have voted -1 for mod_ldap, can I get a vote to remove it now?
>
> BTW,  +1 from me.

+0 to remove it from the core.  I don't mind having a small ldap blob in
apr-util, though, and I'm +1 for having an httpd-ldap repository set up to
house mod_ldap.

--Cliff

--------------------------------------------------------------
   Cliff Woolley
   cliffwoolley@yahoo.com
   Charlottesville, VA