You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@struts.apache.org by Brian Pontarelli <br...@pontarelli.com> on 2007/03/20 19:26:15 UTC
Codebehind issue?
I haven't grabbed the code yet, but that is my next step. Just grabbed
all the 2.0.6 JARs and I think I have a dependency issue or something.
Anyone know off the top of their heads?
java.lang.NullPointerException
org.apache.struts2.codebehind.CodebehindUnknownHandler.<init>(CodebehindUnknownHandler.java:73)
sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:39)
sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:27)
java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:513)
com.opensymphony.xwork2.inject.ContainerImpl$ConstructorInjector.construct(ContainerImpl.java:388)
com.opensymphony.xwork2.inject.ContainerImpl.inject(ContainerImpl.java:461)
com.opensymphony.xwork2.inject.ContainerImpl$7.call(ContainerImpl.java:501)
com.opensymphony.xwork2.inject.ContainerImpl.callInContext(ContainerImpl.java:549)
(snip)
-bp
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Codebehind issue?
Posted by Brian Pontarelli <br...@pontarelli.com>.
Yeah, I've done some more investigation. The Struts docs are pretty
lacking in general and I've brought up most of the doc issues before. I
think there are still bugs out there for them. I'm hoping to help clean
them up next week. I was supposed to start on a large project a few
weeks ago that would give me enough time to contribute code and
documentation to Struts2, but I'm just now getting to that project.
I should have a contributors agreement ready to go later this week.
-bp
Usama Rashwan wrote:
> Hi Brian,
> did u checked this thread
> http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=71257&tstart=15
> and Note , the struts.codebehind.defaultPackage is the package name defined in struts.xml not the real package name
> for example
> [code]
> <struts>
> <package name="testPackage">......</package>
> ......
> </struts>
> then struts.codebehind.defaultPackage shoud be struts.codebehind.defaultPackage =testPackage
> [/code]
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Posted via Jive Forums
> http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=71861&messageID=134480#134480
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Codebehind issue?
Posted by Usama Rashwan <fo...@opensymphony.com>.
Hi Brian,
did u checked this thread
http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=71257&tstart=15
and Note , the struts.codebehind.defaultPackage is the package name defined in struts.xml not the real package name
for example
[code]
<struts>
<package name="testPackage">......</package>
......
</struts>
then struts.codebehind.defaultPackage shoud be struts.codebehind.defaultPackage =testPackage
[/code]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted via Jive Forums
http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=71861&messageID=134480#134480
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Codebehind issue?
Posted by Brian Pontarelli <br...@pontarelli.com>.
I use the default memory, which is 64 or 128 I think. However, I'm a
little surprised that unit tests should be creating more than 64M worth
of objects (minus the maven footprint). This seems like an issue to me.
After each test case all test objects should be released. If a test
creates a large set of Objects and the heap space runs out the JVM
should perform a full GC and clear out memory for use. So, this means
one single test case is creating 64M worth of objects.
-bp
Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Brian you got enough memory setup for Maven?
>
> I have
> MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx512m
> and have no problems.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Posted via Jive Forums
> http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=71861&messageID=134516#134516
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Codebehind issue?
Posted by Claus Ibsen <fo...@opensymphony.com>.
Brian you got enough memory setup for Maven?
I have
MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx512m
and have no problems.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted via Jive Forums
http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=71861&messageID=134516#134516
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Codebehind issue?
Posted by Brian Pontarelli <br...@pontarelli.com>.
Looks like the memory problem is still around. I can't seem to build the
2.0.7 branch. I get a few hundred test failures and a OutOfMemory error.
Not sure where this happens, but somewhere around the
org.apache.struts2.views.jsp.ui.ResetTest.
Anyone else having issues with the tag?
-bp
Brian Pontarelli wrote:
>
> Yeah, same thing. It looks like the PackageConfiguration is null out
> of the Configuration Object.
>
> I'm attempting to grab 2.0.7 tag and compile it and step into the
> codebehind with the debugger. However, the SubVersion repository is
> failing every few hundred files, so it is taking an enormous amount of
> time.
>
> -bp
>
>
> Dave Newton wrote:
>> --- Brian Pontarelli <br...@pontarelli.com> wrote:
>>
>> struts.codebehind.defaultPackage=com.texturemedia.prototype_webapp.action
>>
>>
>> Just out of curiosity does it still break if it's a
>> package w/o underscores?
>>
>> d.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________________________________
>>
>> 8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time with the Yahoo! Search
>> movie showtime shortcut.
>> http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#news
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Codebehind issue?
Posted by Brian Pontarelli <br...@pontarelli.com>.
Yeah, same thing. It looks like the PackageConfiguration is null out of
the Configuration Object.
I'm attempting to grab 2.0.7 tag and compile it and step into the
codebehind with the debugger. However, the SubVersion repository is
failing every few hundred files, so it is taking an enormous amount of time.
-bp
Dave Newton wrote:
> --- Brian Pontarelli <br...@pontarelli.com> wrote:
>
> struts.codebehind.defaultPackage=com.texturemedia.prototype_webapp.action
>
> Just out of curiosity does it still break if it's a
> package w/o underscores?
>
> d.
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> 8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time
> with the Yahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut.
> http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#news
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Codebehind issue?
Posted by Dave Newton <ne...@yahoo.com>.
--- Brian Pontarelli <br...@pontarelli.com> wrote:
>
struts.codebehind.defaultPackage=com.texturemedia.prototype_webapp.action
Just out of curiosity does it still break if it's a
package w/o underscores?
d.
____________________________________________________________________________________
8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time
with the Yahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#news
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: Codebehind issue?
Posted by Brian Pontarelli <br...@pontarelli.com>.
This occurs when I add this declaration to my struts.properties:
struts.codebehind.defaultPackage=com.texturemedia.prototype_webapp.action
Removing it makes it work fine. This package does exist and there are
classes in there. So, I'm not sure what is happening.
-bp
Brian Pontarelli wrote:
> I haven't grabbed the code yet, but that is my next step. Just grabbed
> all the 2.0.6 JARs and I think I have a dependency issue or something.
> Anyone know off the top of their heads?
>
> java.lang.NullPointerException
> org.apache.struts2.codebehind.CodebehindUnknownHandler.<init>(CodebehindUnknownHandler.java:73)
>
> sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
> sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:39)
>
> sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:27)
>
> java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:513)
> com.opensymphony.xwork2.inject.ContainerImpl$ConstructorInjector.construct(ContainerImpl.java:388)
>
> com.opensymphony.xwork2.inject.ContainerImpl.inject(ContainerImpl.java:461)
>
> com.opensymphony.xwork2.inject.ContainerImpl$7.call(ContainerImpl.java:501)
>
> com.opensymphony.xwork2.inject.ContainerImpl.callInContext(ContainerImpl.java:549)
>
> (snip)
>
>
> -bp
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org