You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to reviews@mesos.apache.org by Gilbert Song <so...@gmail.com> on 2019/01/02 19:51:56 UTC
Re: Review Request 68017: Added Seccomp-related protobuf messages.
> On Dec. 13, 2018, 12:20 a.m., Gilbert Song wrote:
> > include/mesos/slave/containerizer.proto
> > Lines 200-215 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/68017/diff/10/?file=2109592#file2109592line200>
> >
> > I saw you remove all `SCMP_` prefix and implemented a hashmap converter in the next patch. You do this for `AUDIT_` architecture on pupose?
>
> Andrei Budnik wrote:
> Adding `SCMP_` prefix leads to compilation errors due to interference with libseccomp's constants.
Probably we should add some comments for getting rid of the `SCMP_` prefix (since people may ask the same question):
// `SCMP_` prefix is not included in `enum` due to compilation conflicts with libseccomp constants.
- Gilbert
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/68017/#review211264
-----------------------------------------------------------
On Nov. 8, 2018, 7:24 a.m., Andrei Budnik wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/68017/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Nov. 8, 2018, 7:24 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for mesos, Gilbert Song, Jie Yu, James Peach, and Qian Zhang.
>
>
> Bugs: MESOS-9033
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-9033
>
>
> Repository: mesos
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> See summary.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> include/mesos/mesos.proto 2ef6ba3aef67cf34227569948fd3ddc8dfd5879d
> include/mesos/slave/containerizer.proto 5b4dcdda0f55ea3355c78d1447c7be9ca54d9dc9
> include/mesos/v1/mesos.proto 1a701da65f653fe4191f92ff1fb1436809b50acb
>
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/68017/diff/11/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andrei Budnik
>
>