You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@rocketmq.apache.org by jinrongtong <ji...@apache.org> on 2023/05/16 00:26:38 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 5.1.1 RC1
Hello RocketMQ Community,
This is the vote for 5.1.1 of Apache RocketMQ.
This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability.
The artifacts:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/5.1.1-rc1/
The staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1193
Git tag for the release:
https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/release-5.1.1
Hash for the release tag:
e244ebb99a1ba5e5dac174c699da8b83a273e7fd
Release Notes:
https://rocketmq.apache.org/zh/release-notes/2023/05/15/5.1.1/
The artifacts have been signed with Key :
EC9F268B4C20590138B11FE701420E4292296EAE, which can be found in the keys file:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
Checklist for reference,
Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking releases.
Fill in the following:
[] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
[] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
[] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[] License and Notice are correct in source package.
[] License and Notice are correct in binary package.
[] All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
[] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
[] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
[] The code can be built success in the source package.
[] Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
[] Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to this email, we sincerely hope to your feedback.
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of votes are reached.
Please vote accordingly:
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
Thanks,
The Apache RocketMQ Team
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 5.1.1 RC1
Posted by 周波 <zh...@gmail.com>.
+1
i checked
[] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
[] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
[] The code can be built success in the source package.
[] Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
[] Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
周波 <zh...@gmail.com> 于2023年5月16日周二 11:47写道：
> +1
>
> aaron ai <aa...@apache.org> 于2023年5月16日周二 11:35写道：
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 8:27 AM jinrongtong <ji...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello RocketMQ Community,
>>>
>>> This is the vote for 5.1.1 of Apache RocketMQ.
>>>
>>> This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability.
>>>
>>> The artifacts:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/5.1.1-rc1/
>>>
>>> The staging repo:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1193
>>>
>>> Git tag for the release:
>>> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/release-5.1.1
>>>
>>> Hash for the release tag:
>>> e244ebb99a1ba5e5dac174c699da8b83a273e7fd
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Release Notes:
>>> https://rocketmq.apache.org/zh/release-notes/2023/05/15/5.1.1/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The artifacts have been signed with Key :
>>> EC9F268B4C20590138B11FE701420E4292296EAE, which can be found in the keys
>>> file:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
>>>
>>> Checklist for reference,
>>> Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking
>>> releases.
>>> Fill in the following:
>>>
>>> [] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
>>> [] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
>>> [] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
>>> release.
>>> [] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
>>> [] License and Notice are correct in source package.
>>> [] License and Notice are correct in binary package.
>>> [] All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
>>> [] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
>>> [] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
>>> [] The code can be built success in the source package.
>>> [] Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
>>> [] Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
>>>
>>> And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to
>>> this email, we sincerely hope to your feedback.
>>>
>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of
>>> votes are reached.
>>>
>>> Please vote accordingly:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>
>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>
>>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> The Apache RocketMQ Team
>>>
>>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 5.1.1 RC1
Posted by 周波 <zh...@gmail.com>.
+1
aaron ai <aa...@apache.org> 于2023年5月16日周二 11:35写道：
> +1
>
> On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 8:27 AM jinrongtong <ji...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello RocketMQ Community,
>>
>> This is the vote for 5.1.1 of Apache RocketMQ.
>>
>> This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability.
>>
>> The artifacts:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/5.1.1-rc1/
>>
>> The staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1193
>>
>> Git tag for the release:
>> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/release-5.1.1
>>
>> Hash for the release tag:
>> e244ebb99a1ba5e5dac174c699da8b83a273e7fd
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Release Notes:
>> https://rocketmq.apache.org/zh/release-notes/2023/05/15/5.1.1/
>>
>>
>>
>> The artifacts have been signed with Key :
>> EC9F268B4C20590138B11FE701420E4292296EAE, which can be found in the keys
>> file:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
>>
>> Checklist for reference,
>> Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking releases.
>> Fill in the following:
>>
>> [] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
>> [] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
>> [] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
>> [] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
>> [] License and Notice are correct in source package.
>> [] License and Notice are correct in binary package.
>> [] All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
>> [] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
>> [] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
>> [] The code can be built success in the source package.
>> [] Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
>> [] Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
>>
>> And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to
>> this email, we sincerely hope to your feedback.
>>
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of
>> votes are reached.
>>
>> Please vote accordingly:
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>>
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>
>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> The Apache RocketMQ Team
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 5.1.1 RC1
Posted by aaron ai <aa...@apache.org>.
+1
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 8:27 AM jinrongtong <ji...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hello RocketMQ Community,
>
> This is the vote for 5.1.1 of Apache RocketMQ.
>
> This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability.
>
> The artifacts:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/5.1.1-rc1/
>
> The staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1193
>
> Git tag for the release:
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/release-5.1.1
>
> Hash for the release tag:
> e244ebb99a1ba5e5dac174c699da8b83a273e7fd
>
>
>
>
> Release Notes:
> https://rocketmq.apache.org/zh/release-notes/2023/05/15/5.1.1/
>
>
>
> The artifacts have been signed with Key :
> EC9F268B4C20590138B11FE701420E4292296EAE, which can be found in the keys
> file:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
>
> Checklist for reference,
> Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking releases.
> Fill in the following:
>
> [] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
> [] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
> [] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> [] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> [] License and Notice are correct in source package.
> [] License and Notice are correct in binary package.
> [] All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
> [] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
> [] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
> [] The code can be built success in the source package.
> [] Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
> [] Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
>
> And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to
> this email, we sincerely hope to your feedback.
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of
> votes are reached.
>
> Please vote accordingly:
>
> [ ] +1 approve
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> The Apache RocketMQ Team
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 5.1.1 RC1
Posted by aaron ai <aa...@apache.org>.
+1
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 8:27 AM jinrongtong <ji...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hello RocketMQ Community,
>
> This is the vote for 5.1.1 of Apache RocketMQ.
>
> This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability.
>
> The artifacts:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/5.1.1-rc1/
>
> The staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1193
>
> Git tag for the release:
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/release-5.1.1
>
> Hash for the release tag:
> e244ebb99a1ba5e5dac174c699da8b83a273e7fd
>
>
>
>
> Release Notes:
> https://rocketmq.apache.org/zh/release-notes/2023/05/15/5.1.1/
>
>
>
> The artifacts have been signed with Key :
> EC9F268B4C20590138B11FE701420E4292296EAE, which can be found in the keys
> file:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
>
> Checklist for reference,
> Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking releases.
> Fill in the following:
>
> [] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
> [] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
> [] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> [] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> [] License and Notice are correct in source package.
> [] License and Notice are correct in binary package.
> [] All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
> [] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
> [] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
> [] The code can be built success in the source package.
> [] Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
> [] Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
>
> And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to
> this email, we sincerely hope to your feedback.
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of
> votes are reached.
>
> Please vote accordingly:
>
> [ ] +1 approve
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> The Apache RocketMQ Team
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 5.1.1 RC1
Posted by Xinyu Zhou <yu...@apache.org>.
+1
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 10:48 AM fuyou <fu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> karp <ka...@apache.org> 于2023年5月17日周三 09:29写道：
>
> > +1
> >
> > I checked:
> > [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for the Source package.
> > [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for the Binary package.
> > [OK] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
> > release.
> > [OK] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> > [OK] License and Notice are correct in the source package.
> > [OK] License and Notice are correct in the binary package.
> > [OK] rocketmq cluster can be start up correctly from bin package
> >
> > ShannonDing <di...@apache.org> 于2023年5月16日周二 13:47写道：
> >
> > > +1， checked：
> > > [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
> > > [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
> > > [OK] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
> > > release.
> > > [OK] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> > > [OK] License and Notice are correct in source package.
> > > [OK] License and Notice are correct in binary package.
> > > [OK] All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
> > > [OK] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
> > > [OK] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
> > > [OK] The code can be built success in the source package.
> > >
> > > At 2023-05-16 08:26:38, "jinrongtong" <ji...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello RocketMQ Community,
> > >
> > > This is the vote for 5.1.1 of Apache RocketMQ.
> > >
> > > This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability.
> > >
> > > The artifacts:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/5.1.1-rc1/
> > >
> > > The staging repo:
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1193
> > >
> > > Git tag for the release:
> > > https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/release-5.1.1
> > >
> > > Hash for the release tag:
> > > e244ebb99a1ba5e5dac174c699da8b83a273e7fd
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Release Notes:
> > > https://rocketmq.apache.org/zh/release-notes/2023/05/15/5.1.1/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The artifacts have been signed with Key :
> > > EC9F268B4C20590138B11FE701420E4292296EAE, which can be found in the
> keys
> > > file:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
> > >
> > > Checklist for reference,
> > > Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking
> > releases.
> > > Fill in the following:
> > >
> > > [] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
> > > [] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
> > > [] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
> > release.
> > > [] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> > > [] License and Notice are correct in source package.
> > > [] License and Notice are correct in binary package.
> > > [] All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
> > > [] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
> > > [] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
> > > [] The code can be built success in the source package.
> > > [] Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
> > > [] Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
> > >
> > > And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to
> > > this email, we sincerely hope to your feedback.
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number
> of
> > > votes are reached.
> > >
> > > Please vote accordingly:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 approve
> > >
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > >
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > The Apache RocketMQ Team
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> =============================================
>
> fuyou001
> Best Regards
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 5.1.1 RC1
Posted by fuyou <fu...@gmail.com>.
+1
karp <ka...@apache.org> 于2023年5月17日周三 09:29写道：
> +1
>
> I checked:
> [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for the Source package.
> [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for the Binary package.
> [OK] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
> release.
> [OK] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> [OK] License and Notice are correct in the source package.
> [OK] License and Notice are correct in the binary package.
> [OK] rocketmq cluster can be start up correctly from bin package
>
> ShannonDing <di...@apache.org> 于2023年5月16日周二 13:47写道：
>
> > +1， checked：
> > [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
> > [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
> > [OK] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
> > release.
> > [OK] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> > [OK] License and Notice are correct in source package.
> > [OK] License and Notice are correct in binary package.
> > [OK] All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
> > [OK] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
> > [OK] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
> > [OK] The code can be built success in the source package.
> >
> > At 2023-05-16 08:26:38, "jinrongtong" <ji...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hello RocketMQ Community,
> >
> > This is the vote for 5.1.1 of Apache RocketMQ.
> >
> > This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability.
> >
> > The artifacts:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/5.1.1-rc1/
> >
> > The staging repo:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1193
> >
> > Git tag for the release:
> > https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/release-5.1.1
> >
> > Hash for the release tag:
> > e244ebb99a1ba5e5dac174c699da8b83a273e7fd
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Release Notes:
> > https://rocketmq.apache.org/zh/release-notes/2023/05/15/5.1.1/
> >
> >
> >
> > The artifacts have been signed with Key :
> > EC9F268B4C20590138B11FE701420E4292296EAE, which can be found in the keys
> > file:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
> >
> > Checklist for reference,
> > Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking
> releases.
> > Fill in the following:
> >
> > [] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
> > [] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
> > [] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
> release.
> > [] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> > [] License and Notice are correct in source package.
> > [] License and Notice are correct in binary package.
> > [] All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
> > [] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
> > [] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
> > [] The code can be built success in the source package.
> > [] Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
> > [] Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
> >
> > And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to
> > this email, we sincerely hope to your feedback.
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of
> > votes are reached.
> >
> > Please vote accordingly:
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> >
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> >
> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > The Apache RocketMQ Team
> >
> >
>
--
=============================================
fuyou001
Best Regards
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 5.1.1 RC1
Posted by karp <ka...@apache.org>.
+1
I checked:
[OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for the Source package.
[OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for the Binary package.
[OK] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[OK] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[OK] License and Notice are correct in the source package.
[OK] License and Notice are correct in the binary package.
[OK] rocketmq cluster can be start up correctly from bin package
ShannonDing <di...@apache.org> 于2023年5月16日周二 13:47写道：
> +1， checked：
> [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
> [OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
> [OK] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
> release.
> [OK] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> [OK] License and Notice are correct in source package.
> [OK] License and Notice are correct in binary package.
> [OK] All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
> [OK] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
> [OK] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
> [OK] The code can be built success in the source package.
>
> At 2023-05-16 08:26:38, "jinrongtong" <ji...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hello RocketMQ Community,
>
> This is the vote for 5.1.1 of Apache RocketMQ.
>
> This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability.
>
> The artifacts:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/5.1.1-rc1/
>
> The staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1193
>
> Git tag for the release:
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/release-5.1.1
>
> Hash for the release tag:
> e244ebb99a1ba5e5dac174c699da8b83a273e7fd
>
>
>
>
> Release Notes:
> https://rocketmq.apache.org/zh/release-notes/2023/05/15/5.1.1/
>
>
>
> The artifacts have been signed with Key :
> EC9F268B4C20590138B11FE701420E4292296EAE, which can be found in the keys
> file:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
>
> Checklist for reference,
> Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking releases.
> Fill in the following:
>
> [] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
> [] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
> [] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> [] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> [] License and Notice are correct in source package.
> [] License and Notice are correct in binary package.
> [] All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
> [] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
> [] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
> [] The code can be built success in the source package.
> [] Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
> [] Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
>
> And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to
> this email, we sincerely hope to your feedback.
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of
> votes are reached.
>
> Please vote accordingly:
>
> [ ] +1 approve
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> The Apache RocketMQ Team
>
>
Re:[VOTE] Release Apache RocketMQ 5.1.1 RC1
Posted by ShannonDing <di...@apache.org>.
+1， checked：
[OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
[OK] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
[OK] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[OK] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[OK] License and Notice are correct in source package.
[OK] License and Notice are correct in binary package.
[OK] All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
[OK] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
[OK] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
[OK] The code can be built success in the source package.
At 2023-05-16 08:26:38, "jinrongtong" <ji...@apache.org> wrote:
Hello RocketMQ Community,
This is the vote for 5.1.1 of Apache RocketMQ.
This release fixes some bugs to enhance stability.
The artifacts:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/5.1.1-rc1/
The staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacherocketmq-1193
Git tag for the release:
https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/tree/release-5.1.1
Hash for the release tag:
e244ebb99a1ba5e5dac174c699da8b83a273e7fd
Release Notes:
https://rocketmq.apache.org/zh/release-notes/2023/05/15/5.1.1/
The artifacts have been signed with Key :
EC9F268B4C20590138B11FE701420E4292296EAE, which can be found in the keys file:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS
Checklist for reference,
Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking releases.
Fill in the following:
[] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.
[] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.
[] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[] Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[] License and Notice are correct in source package.
[] License and Notice are correct in binary package.
[] All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
[] No compiled archives bundled in source archive.
[] Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.
[] The code can be built success in the source package.
[] Start nameserver and broker according to the quick-start
[] Run clusterList command to see if the version is correct
And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to this email, we sincerely hope to your feedback.
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of votes are reached.
Please vote accordingly:
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
Thanks,
The Apache RocketMQ Team