Re: [VOTE] target-less build files

[Erik Hatcher <ja...@ehatchersolutions.com>]

Somehow this slipped through my usual careful radar of e-mails, and I 
apologize (switched to a new O/S and new e-mail client and the flood of 
e-mails has not stopped to let me catch my breath).  Is this vote still 
on the table?

I'm +0, if it still matters.  I really like having all tasks be 
available at the top-level, but it would not matter to my personal 
builds whether targets were optional as I'd still use them myself.

	Erik


Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> after I've made these things possible, Peter has indicated that he
> doesn't like them.  Honestly, target-less build files have been the
> driving force for me to tackle the "tasks outside of targets" part and
> I would have liked an early indicator as I've said what I'd be doing
> quite clearly several times, but hey ...
> 
> Here we go.
> 
> I like target-less build files as an easy entry for newbies as well as
> a stripped down process for very simple things (Ant's own docs.xml
> could perfectly be stated without targets at all).
> 
> +1 to target-less build files.
> 
> Stefan
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> 
> 
> 



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>