You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@camel.apache.org by Tim Dudgeon <td...@gmail.com> on 2016/01/04 19:37:15 UTC
Re: State of the camel-cdi component
Hi,
Was wondering what the latest status was here (read below)?
I'm trying to adapt a camel-servlet app to use CDI and it's not clear
how to best go about this.
Thanks
Tim
On 11/12/2014 16:07, Charles Moulliard wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> I'm working with Antonin on that new camel-cdi. when the code will be ready
> it will be integrated with Camel project
>
> Regards,
>
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Jason Holmberg <ho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Will the Camel project will officially adopt:
>>
>> https://github.com/astefanutti/camel-cdi
>>
>> as its CDI extension. I have experimented with the 'official' extension
>> available in 2.14.0 and feel that it is lacking much of what it needs to a
>> viable component where as https://github.com/astefanutti/camel-cdi seems
>> to
>> have addresses many if not all of the deficiencies.
>>
>> I see that there is active development on the official camel-cdi component,
>> I feel that the work being done in
>> https://github.com/astefanutti/camel-cdi
>> is looking and working really well.
>>
>> We would really prefer CDI over Spring for DI.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jason
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/State-of-the-camel-cdi-component-tp5760578.html
>> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>
>
Re: State of the camel-cdi component
Posted by Tim Dudgeon <td...@gmail.com>.
That's great to hear. Roll on 2.17.
What was not clear for me was whether it would work (=how to get it to
work) in a pure servlet (=jetty, tomcat) environment.
Tim
On 04/01/2016 18:55, Antonin Stefanutti wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> We are actively working on improving the Camel CDI integration for the upcoming 2.17.0 release. This is followed-up in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-9201.
>
> That will be essentially the merging of the work being done in https://github.com/astefanutti/camel-cdi.
>
> This will bring, among other things, better CDI programming model integration plus the portability to all targeted runtimes (Java SE, servlets containers, Java EE, OSGi with the expositing of the CDI camel contexts as OSGi services) and implementations (Weld and OpenWebBeans).
>
> In the meantime, you can use the version in https://github.com/astefanutti/camel-cdi as a drop-in replacement and switch back to the official one once that gets merged and released into the official component.
>
> Antonin
>
>> On 04 Jan 2016, at 19:37, Tim Dudgeon <td...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Was wondering what the latest status was here (read below)?
>> I'm trying to adapt a camel-servlet app to use CDI and it's not clear how to best go about this.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Tim
>>
>> On 11/12/2014 16:07, Charles Moulliard wrote:
>>> Hi Jason,
>>>
>>> I'm working with Antonin on that new camel-cdi. when the code will be ready
>>> it will be integrated with Camel project
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Jason Holmberg <ho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Will the Camel project will officially adopt:
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/astefanutti/camel-cdi
>>>>
>>>> as its CDI extension. I have experimented with the 'official' extension
>>>> available in 2.14.0 and feel that it is lacking much of what it needs to a
>>>> viable component where as https://github.com/astefanutti/camel-cdi seems
>>>> to
>>>> have addresses many if not all of the deficiencies.
>>>>
>>>> I see that there is active development on the official camel-cdi component,
>>>> I feel that the work being done in
>>>> https://github.com/astefanutti/camel-cdi
>>>> is looking and working really well.
>>>>
>>>> We would really prefer CDI over Spring for DI.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Jason
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context:
>>>> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/State-of-the-camel-cdi-component-tp5760578.html
>>>> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>>
>>>
Re: State of the camel-cdi component
Posted by Antonin Stefanutti <an...@stefanutti.fr>.
Hi Tim,
We are actively working on improving the Camel CDI integration for the upcoming 2.17.0 release. This is followed-up in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-9201.
That will be essentially the merging of the work being done in https://github.com/astefanutti/camel-cdi.
This will bring, among other things, better CDI programming model integration plus the portability to all targeted runtimes (Java SE, servlets containers, Java EE, OSGi with the expositing of the CDI camel contexts as OSGi services) and implementations (Weld and OpenWebBeans).
In the meantime, you can use the version in https://github.com/astefanutti/camel-cdi as a drop-in replacement and switch back to the official one once that gets merged and released into the official component.
Antonin
> On 04 Jan 2016, at 19:37, Tim Dudgeon <td...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Was wondering what the latest status was here (read below)?
> I'm trying to adapt a camel-servlet app to use CDI and it's not clear how to best go about this.
>
> Thanks
>
> Tim
>
> On 11/12/2014 16:07, Charles Moulliard wrote:
>> Hi Jason,
>>
>> I'm working with Antonin on that new camel-cdi. when the code will be ready
>> it will be integrated with Camel project
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Jason Holmberg <ho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Will the Camel project will officially adopt:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/astefanutti/camel-cdi
>>>
>>> as its CDI extension. I have experimented with the 'official' extension
>>> available in 2.14.0 and feel that it is lacking much of what it needs to a
>>> viable component where as https://github.com/astefanutti/camel-cdi seems
>>> to
>>> have addresses many if not all of the deficiencies.
>>>
>>> I see that there is active development on the official camel-cdi component,
>>> I feel that the work being done in
>>> https://github.com/astefanutti/camel-cdi
>>> is looking and working really well.
>>>
>>> We would really prefer CDI over Spring for DI.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jason
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/State-of-the-camel-cdi-component-tp5760578.html
>>> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>
>>
>