You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to ruleqa@spamassassin.apache.org by Axb <ax...@gmail.com> on 2014/10/30 10:44:24 UTC
AXB_XSA_PXYEX
Jari,
Could you pls check these hits... are they really ham?
(/home/jarif/Maildir/.Confirmed-HAM/)
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20141029-r1635070-n/T_AXB_XSA_PXYEX?mclog=ham-jarif
Thanks
Alex
Re: AXB_XSA_PXYEX
Posted by Jari Fredrisson <ja...@iki.fi>.
On 30.10.2014 19:37, Jari Fredrisson wrote:
> On 30.10.2014 18:27, Axb wrote:
>> On 10/30/2014 05:14 PM, Jari Fredrisson wrote:
>>> On 30.10.2014 17:00, Jari Fredrisson wrote:
>>>> On 30.10.2014 11:44, Axb wrote:
>>>>> Jari,
>>>>>
>>>>> Could you pls check these hits... are they really ham?
>>>>> (/home/jarif/Maildir/.Confirmed-HAM/)
>>>>>
>>>>> http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20141029-r1635070-n/T_AXB_XSA_PXYEX?mclog=ham-jarif
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> Alex
>>>>>
>>>> Yes. Technically they are ham, no matter that I lost money to the
>>>> sender
>>>> (scammer) of 4 of those emails. But ham.
>>>>
>>>> br. jarif
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I can also send these specimens unaltered to You, if it helps anything.
>> that would be cool... zip'em up... need to understand how that pattern
>> shows up in real ham...
>>
>> Thx
>> Alex
>>
> Here.
>
> Please do not kill me ;)
>
Well, I goofed big time. But these are nothing sensitive or too
important anyway.
Re: AXB_XSA_PXYEX
Posted by John Hardin <jh...@impsec.org>.
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, John Hardin wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, Jari Fredrisson wrote:
>
>> On 30.10.2014 18:27, Axb wrote:
>> > On 10/30/2014 05:14 PM, Jari Fredrisson wrote:
>> > > On 30.10.2014 17:00, Jari Fredrisson wrote:
>> > >
>> > > I can also send these specimens unaltered to You, if it helps
>> > > anything.
>>
>> Here.
>
> Did you mean to send that to the list?
Never mind. (note to self: catch up before replying!)
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhardin@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
...the Fates notice those who buy chainsaws...
-- www.darwinawards.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tomorrow: Halloween
Re: AXB_XSA_PXYEX
Posted by John Hardin <jh...@impsec.org>.
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014, Jari Fredrisson wrote:
> On 30.10.2014 18:27, Axb wrote:
>> On 10/30/2014 05:14 PM, Jari Fredrisson wrote:
>>> On 30.10.2014 17:00, Jari Fredrisson wrote:
>>>
>>> I can also send these specimens unaltered to You, if it helps anything.
>
> Here.
Did you mean to send that to the list?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhardin@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
...the Fates notice those who buy chainsaws...
-- www.darwinawards.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tomorrow: Halloween
Re: AXB_XSA_PXYEX
Posted by Jari Fredrisson <ja...@iki.fi>.
On 30.10.2014 19:37, Jari Fredrisson wrote:
> On 30.10.2014 18:27, Axb wrote:
>> On 10/30/2014 05:14 PM, Jari Fredrisson wrote:
>>> On 30.10.2014 17:00, Jari Fredrisson wrote:
>>>> On 30.10.2014 11:44, Axb wrote:
>>>>> Jari,
>>>>>
>>>>> Could you pls check these hits... are they really ham?
>>>>> (/home/jarif/Maildir/.Confirmed-HAM/)
>>>>>
>>>>> http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20141029-r1635070-n/T_AXB_XSA_PXYEX?mclog=ham-jarif
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> Alex
>>>>>
>>>> Yes. Technically they are ham, no matter that I lost money to the
>>>> sender
>>>> (scammer) of 4 of those emails. But ham.
>>>>
>>>> br. jarif
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I can also send these specimens unaltered to You, if it helps anything.
>> that would be cool... zip'em up... need to understand how that pattern
>> shows up in real ham...
>>
>> Thx
>> Alex
>>
> Here.
>
> Please do not kill me ;)
>
Huh. Damage.
Re: AXB_XSA_PXYEX
Posted by Jari Fredrisson <ja...@iki.fi>.
On 30.10.2014 18:27, Axb wrote:
> On 10/30/2014 05:14 PM, Jari Fredrisson wrote:
>> On 30.10.2014 17:00, Jari Fredrisson wrote:
>>> On 30.10.2014 11:44, Axb wrote:
>>>> Jari,
>>>>
>>>> Could you pls check these hits... are they really ham?
>>>> (/home/jarif/Maildir/.Confirmed-HAM/)
>>>>
>>>> http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20141029-r1635070-n/T_AXB_XSA_PXYEX?mclog=ham-jarif
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Alex
>>>>
>>> Yes. Technically they are ham, no matter that I lost money to the
>>> sender
>>> (scammer) of 4 of those emails. But ham.
>>>
>>> br. jarif
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> I can also send these specimens unaltered to You, if it helps anything.
>
> that would be cool... zip'em up... need to understand how that pattern
> shows up in real ham...
>
> Thx
> Alex
>
Here.
Please do not kill me ;)
Re: AXB_XSA_PXYEX
Posted by Axb <ax...@gmail.com>.
On 10/30/2014 05:14 PM, Jari Fredrisson wrote:
> On 30.10.2014 17:00, Jari Fredrisson wrote:
>> On 30.10.2014 11:44, Axb wrote:
>>> Jari,
>>>
>>> Could you pls check these hits... are they really ham?
>>> (/home/jarif/Maildir/.Confirmed-HAM/)
>>>
>>> http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20141029-r1635070-n/T_AXB_XSA_PXYEX?mclog=ham-jarif
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Alex
>>>
>> Yes. Technically they are ham, no matter that I lost money to the sender
>> (scammer) of 4 of those emails. But ham.
>>
>> br. jarif
>>
>>
>>
>>
> I can also send these specimens unaltered to You, if it helps anything.
that would be cool... zip'em up... need to understand how that pattern
shows up in real ham...
Thx
Alex
Re: AXB_XSA_PXYEX
Posted by Jari Fredrisson <ja...@iki.fi>.
On 30.10.2014 17:00, Jari Fredrisson wrote:
> On 30.10.2014 11:44, Axb wrote:
>> Jari,
>>
>> Could you pls check these hits... are they really ham?
>> (/home/jarif/Maildir/.Confirmed-HAM/)
>>
>> http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20141029-r1635070-n/T_AXB_XSA_PXYEX?mclog=ham-jarif
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Alex
>>
> Yes. Technically they are ham, no matter that I lost money to the sender
> (scammer) of 4 of those emails. But ham.
>
> br. jarif
>
>
>
>
I can also send these specimens unaltered to You, if it helps anything.
br. jarif
Re: AXB_XSA_PXYEX
Posted by Jari Fredrisson <ja...@iki.fi>.
On 30.10.2014 11:44, Axb wrote:
> Jari,
>
> Could you pls check these hits... are they really ham?
> (/home/jarif/Maildir/.Confirmed-HAM/)
>
> http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20141029-r1635070-n/T_AXB_XSA_PXYEX?mclog=ham-jarif
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Alex
>
Yes. Technically they are ham, no matter that I lost money to the sender
(scammer) of 4 of those emails. But ham.
br. jarif