You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Lars Hofhansl (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/10/21 20:00:33 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-12311) Version stats in HFiles?

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12311?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14178748#comment-14178748 ] 

Lars Hofhansl commented on HBASE-12311:
---------------------------------------

Are there better/other ideas?
The core issue we want to get to: If a (re)seek would get us to a different HFile block we should seek, otherwise repeated next()'s inside the block is (far) more efficient. This decision would need to be made efficient - without needing a bunch of compares of the row-key.

Tracking the maximum number of versions seen would a possible and relatively cheap proxy to guess the likelihood of a seek getting us out of the current block.


> Version stats in HFiles?
> ------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-12311
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12311
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Brainstorming
>            Reporter: Lars Hofhansl
>
> In HBASE-9778 I basically punted the decision on whether doing repeated scanner.next() called instead of the issueing (re)seeks to the user.
> I think we can do better.
> One way do that is maintain simple stats of what the maximum number of versions we've seen for any row/col combination and store these in the HFile's metadata (just like the timerange, oldest Put, etc).
> Then we estimate fairly accurately whether we have to expect lots of versions (i.e. seek between columns is better) or not (in which case we'd issue repeated next()'s).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)