You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to gitbox@activemq.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/07/18 07:27:44 UTC

[GitHub] [activemq] jbonofre commented on a change in pull request #682: [AMQ-7309] Update to jakarta.jms/jakarta.jms-api:2.0.3

jbonofre commented on a change in pull request #682:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/682#discussion_r671797478



##########
File path: activemq-web-demo/pom.xml
##########
@@ -142,8 +142,8 @@
   <dependencies>
     <!-- j2ee jars -->
     <dependency>
-      <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId>
-      <artifactId>geronimo-jms_1.1_spec</artifactId>

Review comment:
       That's my point, agree with Romain: it's my proposal, don't use Jakarta but rather Geronimo Spec instead. It's what other projects are doing (especially Camel). Geronimo Spec supports OSGi cleanly, so, it's better to use it instead of Jakarta.




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: gitbox-unsubscribe@activemq.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org