Re: Mass Changing of Bugs

[Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>]

On 24/03/2010 11:42, Justin Mason wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:34, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>> On 24/03/2010 11:24, Justin Mason wrote:
>>> So it sounds like, when the "Change Several Bugs At Once" option is
>>> used, if _any_ of the bugs qualify for the above condition, _all_
>>> of the bugs are modified accordingly.    That's not desirable. ;)
>>> Mark, is that possible?
>>
>> The same thought occurred to me. I'll do some checking. It'll take a
>> little while as I don't want to test this on the live system. I'll need
>> to take backup of the data, copy to my local machine, setup bugzilla
>> etc, etc.
>>
>> On the assumption you won't need to do this again for a few weeks, I'll
>> try and get answer for you by the end of the month.
> 
> thanks dude, that's perfect.  I doubt we'll have a release by then ;)

This should now be fixed. I have tested the fix locally and everything
looks good. I haven't tested it on the live system. I recommend you
confirm the fix on a small number of bugs and let me know if you still
see a problem.

Mark

Re: Mass Changing of Bugs

[Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org>]

On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 18:45, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 24/03/2010 11:42, Justin Mason wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:34, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> On 24/03/2010 11:24, Justin Mason wrote:
>>>> So it sounds like, when the "Change Several Bugs At Once" option is
>>>> used, if _any_ of the bugs qualify for the above condition, _all_
>>>> of the bugs are modified accordingly.    That's not desirable. ;)
>>>> Mark, is that possible?
>>>
>>> The same thought occurred to me. I'll do some checking. It'll take a
>>> little while as I don't want to test this on the live system. I'll need
>>> to take backup of the data, copy to my local machine, setup bugzilla
>>> etc, etc.
>>>
>>> On the assumption you won't need to do this again for a few weeks, I'll
>>> try and get answer for you by the end of the month.
>>
>> thanks dude, that's perfect.  I doubt we'll have a release by then ;)
>
> This should now be fixed. I have tested the fix locally and everything
> looks good. I haven't tested it on the live system. I recommend you
> confirm the fix on a small number of bugs and let me know if you still
> see a problem.


Thanks Mark -- looks good from here!