[jira] [Commented] (NIFI-5384) FlowFile's queued in batches should all have the same Queue time

["ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16535095#comment-16535095 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-5384:
--------------------------------------

GitHub user patricker opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2849

    NIFI-5384 FlowFile's queued in batches should all have the same Queue…

    … time
    
    While building some batching unit tests I started making the assumption that FlowFile's sent to session.Transfer in batches should all have the same Queued time. Only to find out that wasn't true.
    
    Updating batch queuing of FlowFile's so that FlowFile's transferred together all have the same queue time.
    
    ### For all changes:
    - [x] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced 
         in the commit message?
    
    - [x] Does your PR title start with NIFI-XXXX where XXXX is the JIRA number you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" character.
    
    - [x] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target branch (typically master)?
    
    - [x] Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit?
    
    ### For code changes:
    - [ ] Have you ensured that the full suite of tests is executed via mvn -Pcontrib-check clean install at the root nifi folder?
    - [x] Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?
    - [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)? 
    - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE file, including the main LICENSE file under nifi-assembly?
    - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the NOTICE file, including the main NOTICE file found under nifi-assembly?
    - [ ] If adding new Properties, have you added .displayName in addition to .name (programmatic access) for each of the new properties?
    
    ### For documentation related changes:
    - [ ] Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in which it is rendered?
    
    ### Note:
    Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/patricker/nifi NIFI-5384

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2849.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #2849
    
----
commit 5bd487d08049d9c74ef46607200268819042e2bf
Author: patricker <pa...@...>
Date:   2018-07-06T16:38:04Z

    NIFI-5384 FlowFile's queued in batches should all have the same Queue time

----


> FlowFile's queued in batches should all have the same Queue time
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-5384
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5384
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core Framework
>            Reporter: Peter Wicks
>            Assignee: Peter Wicks
>            Priority: Minor
>
> When performing a Session.Transfer on a list of FlowFile's, all FlowFIle's should have the same queue time.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)