You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@camel.apache.org by "Claus Ibsen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/12/03 13:33:52 UTC
[jira] Created: (CAMEL-2254) TransactionErrorHandler - Better
support for mixed transactions using different propagation behaviors
TransactionErrorHandler - Better support for mixed transactions using different propagation behaviors
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: CAMEL-2254
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2254
Project: Apache Camel
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: camel-core, camel-spring
Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 2.1.0
Reporter: Claus Ibsen
Assignee: Claus Ibsen
Fix For: 2.2.0
So you can have multiple routes with different transaction propagations
route a - required
route b - requires new
Then let a message route a -> b.
And in case b should rollback then a can still be comitted
But also the entire route should be able to rollback
And hence why we need to introduce a new keyword {{markRollbackLocalOnly()}} in the DSL which can be used to say that in case route B fails then just rollback this route but the outer transaction should still be comitted.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (CAMEL-2254) TransactionErrorHandler - Better
support for mixed transactions using different propagation behaviors
Posted by "Claus Ibsen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=56247#action_56247 ]
Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-2254:
------------------------------------
Updated wiki page with an example
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CAMEL/Transactional+Client
See section - Using multiple routes with different propagation behaviors
> TransactionErrorHandler - Better support for mixed transactions using different propagation behaviors
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-2254
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2254
> Project: Apache Camel
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: camel-core, camel-spring
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 2.1.0
> Reporter: Claus Ibsen
> Assignee: Claus Ibsen
> Fix For: 2.2.0
>
>
> So you can have multiple routes with different transaction propagations
> route a - required
> route b - requires new
> Then let a message route a -> b.
> And in case b should rollback then a can still be comitted
> But also the entire route should be able to rollback
> And hence why we need to introduce a new keyword {{markRollbackLocalOnly()}} in the DSL which can be used to say that in case route B fails then just rollback this route but the outer transaction should still be comitted.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Resolved: (CAMEL-2254) TransactionErrorHandler - Better
support for mixed transactions using different propagation behaviors
Posted by "Claus Ibsen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Claus Ibsen resolved CAMEL-2254.
--------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
> TransactionErrorHandler - Better support for mixed transactions using different propagation behaviors
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-2254
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2254
> Project: Apache Camel
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: camel-core, camel-spring
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 2.1.0
> Reporter: Claus Ibsen
> Assignee: Claus Ibsen
> Fix For: 2.2.0
>
>
> So you can have multiple routes with different transaction propagations
> route a - required
> route b - requires new
> Then let a message route a -> b.
> And in case b should rollback then a can still be comitted
> But also the entire route should be able to rollback
> And hence why we need to introduce a new keyword {{markRollbackLocalOnly()}} in the DSL which can be used to say that in case route B fails then just rollback this route but the outer transaction should still be comitted.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (CAMEL-2254) TransactionErrorHandler - Better
support for mixed transactions using different propagation behaviors
Posted by "Claus Ibsen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=56246#action_56246 ]
Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-2254:
------------------------------------
trunk: 886781.
And at DEBUG level you can see the transaction begin/commit/rollback events. For example here we got an outer and inner TX where its the inner that rollback while the outer commits.
{code}
2009-12-03 15:08:28,793 [main ] DEBUG TransactionErrorHandler - Transaction begin (0x2bed82) for ExchangeId: 8e034445-a6ad-4504-8a1a-1cebe129cee4
2009-12-03 15:08:29,884 [main ] DEBUG TransactionErrorHandler - Transaction begin (0x967db7) for ExchangeId: 8e034445-a6ad-4504-8a1a-1cebe129cee4
2009-12-03 15:08:29,886 [main ] DEBUG TransactionErrorHandler - Transaction rollback (0x967db7) for ExchangeId: 8e034445-a6ad-4504-8a1a-1cebe129cee4
2009-12-03 15:08:29,887 [main ] DEBUG TransactionErrorHandler - Transaction commit (0x2bed82) for ExchangeId: 8e034445-a6ad-4504-8a1a-1cebe129cee4
{code}
> TransactionErrorHandler - Better support for mixed transactions using different propagation behaviors
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-2254
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-2254
> Project: Apache Camel
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: camel-core, camel-spring
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 2.1.0
> Reporter: Claus Ibsen
> Assignee: Claus Ibsen
> Fix For: 2.2.0
>
>
> So you can have multiple routes with different transaction propagations
> route a - required
> route b - requires new
> Then let a message route a -> b.
> And in case b should rollback then a can still be comitted
> But also the entire route should be able to rollback
> And hence why we need to introduce a new keyword {{markRollbackLocalOnly()}} in the DSL which can be used to say that in case route B fails then just rollback this route but the outer transaction should still be comitted.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.