You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@lucenenet.apache.org by Foo JH <jh...@extracktor.com> on 2008/05/14 05:24:21 UTC
Is Lucene.Net 2.1 official?
I notice that there is a 2.1 source code, but the web site
http://incubator.apache.org/lucene.net/ does not mention it in the News
section. There is however documentation on 2.1
Is the News section outdated, or are we looking at some form of beta
release for 2.1?
Re: Is Lucene.Net 2.1 official?
Posted by Foo JH <jh...@extracktor.com>.
Thank Digy. I think it's comforting news.
Digy wrote:
> Good news.
>
> DIGY
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Garski [mailto:mgarski@myspace.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 9:01 PM
> To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Is Lucene.Net 2.1 official?
>
> Hi Everyone -
>
> We've been working with George to port 2.3.1 from Java to .NET. We're
> using the same method that George has done in the past, namely to run a
> conversion using the Microsoft tool to convert from Java to C#, then
> make any manual fixes necessary to get everything to compile. Once
> we're done with that George will check everything into SVN for the
> community to download and contribute fixes. Our plan is to make this
> the last port that is done in such a way, that future ports will be done
> on a file by file basis so that we are able to keep up with the changes
> being made in the Java trunk.
>
> We are also working to get additional committers on the project so that
> it no longer relies on any one person.
>
> Unfortunately I don't have a date for when it will get checked in to SVN
> at this time.
>
> Michael
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Foo JH [mailto:jhfoo-ml@extracktor.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 10:52 AM
> To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Is Lucene.Net 2.1 official?
>
> Thanks Digy. Just to confirm your response. Does this mean there are
> currently no more support for lucene.net?
>
> Digy wrote:
>
>> The sole committer(George Aroush) quitted the project just before the
>> offical release of 2.1.
>> But 2.1 is mature enough and I use it for months without any problem.
>>
>> DIGY.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Foo JH [mailto:jhfoo-ml@extracktor.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 6:24 AM
>> To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Is Lucene.Net 2.1 official?
>>
>> I notice that there is a 2.1 source code, but the web site
>> http://incubator.apache.org/lucene.net/ does not mention it in the
>>
> News
>
>> section. There is however documentation on 2.1
>>
>> Is the News section outdated, or are we looking at some form of beta
>> release for 2.1?
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
RE: Is Lucene.Net 2.1 official?
Posted by Digy <di...@gmail.com>.
Good news.
DIGY
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Garski [mailto:mgarski@myspace.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 9:01 PM
To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Is Lucene.Net 2.1 official?
Hi Everyone -
We've been working with George to port 2.3.1 from Java to .NET. We're
using the same method that George has done in the past, namely to run a
conversion using the Microsoft tool to convert from Java to C#, then
make any manual fixes necessary to get everything to compile. Once
we're done with that George will check everything into SVN for the
community to download and contribute fixes. Our plan is to make this
the last port that is done in such a way, that future ports will be done
on a file by file basis so that we are able to keep up with the changes
being made in the Java trunk.
We are also working to get additional committers on the project so that
it no longer relies on any one person.
Unfortunately I don't have a date for when it will get checked in to SVN
at this time.
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: Foo JH [mailto:jhfoo-ml@extracktor.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 10:52 AM
To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is Lucene.Net 2.1 official?
Thanks Digy. Just to confirm your response. Does this mean there are
currently no more support for lucene.net?
Digy wrote:
> The sole committer(George Aroush) quitted the project just before the
> offical release of 2.1.
> But 2.1 is mature enough and I use it for months without any problem.
>
> DIGY.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Foo JH [mailto:jhfoo-ml@extracktor.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 6:24 AM
> To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Is Lucene.Net 2.1 official?
>
> I notice that there is a 2.1 source code, but the web site
> http://incubator.apache.org/lucene.net/ does not mention it in the
News
> section. There is however documentation on 2.1
>
> Is the News section outdated, or are we looking at some form of beta
> release for 2.1?
>
>
RE: Is Lucene.Net 2.1 official?
Posted by Michael Garski <mg...@myspace.com>.
Hi Everyone -
We've been working with George to port 2.3.1 from Java to .NET. We're
using the same method that George has done in the past, namely to run a
conversion using the Microsoft tool to convert from Java to C#, then
make any manual fixes necessary to get everything to compile. Once
we're done with that George will check everything into SVN for the
community to download and contribute fixes. Our plan is to make this
the last port that is done in such a way, that future ports will be done
on a file by file basis so that we are able to keep up with the changes
being made in the Java trunk.
We are also working to get additional committers on the project so that
it no longer relies on any one person.
Unfortunately I don't have a date for when it will get checked in to SVN
at this time.
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: Foo JH [mailto:jhfoo-ml@extracktor.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 10:52 AM
To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is Lucene.Net 2.1 official?
Thanks Digy. Just to confirm your response. Does this mean there are
currently no more support for lucene.net?
Digy wrote:
> The sole committer(George Aroush) quitted the project just before the
> offical release of 2.1.
> But 2.1 is mature enough and I use it for months without any problem.
>
> DIGY.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Foo JH [mailto:jhfoo-ml@extracktor.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 6:24 AM
> To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Is Lucene.Net 2.1 official?
>
> I notice that there is a 2.1 source code, but the web site
> http://incubator.apache.org/lucene.net/ does not mention it in the
News
> section. There is however documentation on 2.1
>
> Is the News section outdated, or are we looking at some form of beta
> release for 2.1?
>
>
RE: Is Lucene.Net 2.1 official?
Posted by Digy <di...@gmail.com>.
Yes.
But see
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-lucene-net-user/200803.mb
ox/%3C7112862FD2F84D49927A5A5E0758451E807F5C@fegplmsexmb14.ffe.foxeg.com%3E
DIGY
-----Original Message-----
From: Foo JH [mailto:jhfoo-ml@extracktor.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 8:52 PM
To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is Lucene.Net 2.1 official?
Thanks Digy. Just to confirm your response. Does this mean there are
currently no more support for lucene.net?
Digy wrote:
> The sole committer(George Aroush) quitted the project just before the
> offical release of 2.1.
> But 2.1 is mature enough and I use it for months without any problem.
>
> DIGY.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Foo JH [mailto:jhfoo-ml@extracktor.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 6:24 AM
> To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Is Lucene.Net 2.1 official?
>
> I notice that there is a 2.1 source code, but the web site
> http://incubator.apache.org/lucene.net/ does not mention it in the News
> section. There is however documentation on 2.1
>
> Is the News section outdated, or are we looking at some form of beta
> release for 2.1?
>
>
Re: Is Lucene.Net 2.1 official?
Posted by Foo JH <jh...@extracktor.com>.
Thanks Digy. Just to confirm your response. Does this mean there are
currently no more support for lucene.net?
Digy wrote:
> The sole committer(George Aroush) quitted the project just before the
> offical release of 2.1.
> But 2.1 is mature enough and I use it for months without any problem.
>
> DIGY.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Foo JH [mailto:jhfoo-ml@extracktor.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 6:24 AM
> To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Is Lucene.Net 2.1 official?
>
> I notice that there is a 2.1 source code, but the web site
> http://incubator.apache.org/lucene.net/ does not mention it in the News
> section. There is however documentation on 2.1
>
> Is the News section outdated, or are we looking at some form of beta
> release for 2.1?
>
>
RE: Is Lucene.Net 2.1 official?
Posted by Digy <di...@gmail.com>.
The sole committer(George Aroush) quitted the project just before the
offical release of 2.1.
But 2.1 is mature enough and I use it for months without any problem.
DIGY.
-----Original Message-----
From: Foo JH [mailto:jhfoo-ml@extracktor.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 6:24 AM
To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Is Lucene.Net 2.1 official?
I notice that there is a 2.1 source code, but the web site
http://incubator.apache.org/lucene.net/ does not mention it in the News
section. There is however documentation on 2.1
Is the News section outdated, or are we looking at some form of beta
release for 2.1?