You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@tapestry.apache.org by Andrea Chiumenti <ki...@gmail.com> on 2006/12/11 15:27:56 UTC
Question about validators
Is there any reason, other then historical, why some validators are into
org.apache.tapestry.valid<http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry4/tapestry/apidocs/org/apache/tapestry/valid/package-frame.html>and
others into
org.apache.tapestry.valid<http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry4/tapestry/apidocs/org/apache/tapestry/valid/package-frame.html>packages
?
I'm watching at tap 4.0.2 and I'd like to extend them. If there is no
difference between the two packages I'd like to put them into the same
package.
Thank in advance,
kiuma
Re: Question about validators
Posted by Andrea Chiumenti <ki...@gmail.com>.
Thank you!
On 12/11/06, Sam Gendler <sg...@ideasculptor.com> wrote:
>
> form.valid are the new validators that you want to use. The others
> are from the now deprecated api that was in use in version prior to
> tap 4, I believe.
>
> --sam
>
>
> On 12/11/06, Andrea Chiumenti <ki...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Is there any reason, other then historical, why some validators are into
> > org.apache.tapestry.valid<
> http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry4/tapestry/apidocs/org/apache/tapestry/valid/package-frame.html
> >and
> > others into
> > org.apache.tapestry.valid<
> http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry4/tapestry/apidocs/org/apache/tapestry/valid/package-frame.html
> >packages
> > ?
> > I'm watching at tap 4.0.2 and I'd like to extend them. If there is no
> > difference between the two packages I'd like to put them into the same
> > package.
> >
> > Thank in advance,
> > kiuma
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org
>
>
Re: Question about validators
Posted by Sam Gendler <sg...@ideasculptor.com>.
form.valid are the new validators that you want to use. The others
are from the now deprecated api that was in use in version prior to
tap 4, I believe.
--sam
On 12/11/06, Andrea Chiumenti <ki...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there any reason, other then historical, why some validators are into
> org.apache.tapestry.valid<http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry4/tapestry/apidocs/org/apache/tapestry/valid/package-frame.html>and
> others into
> org.apache.tapestry.valid<http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry4/tapestry/apidocs/org/apache/tapestry/valid/package-frame.html>packages
> ?
> I'm watching at tap 4.0.2 and I'd like to extend them. If there is no
> difference between the two packages I'd like to put them into the same
> package.
>
> Thank in advance,
> kiuma
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tapestry.apache.org