You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/12/20 13:52:13 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-10175) 2-thread ChaosMonkey steps on its own toes

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13853931#comment-13853931 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-10175:
-----------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12619725/HBASE-10175.patch
  against trunk revision .
  ATTACHMENT ID: 12619725

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 21 new or modified tests.

    {color:green}+1 hadoop1.0{color}.  The patch compiles against the hadoop 1.0 profile.

    {color:green}+1 hadoop1.1{color}.  The patch compiles against the hadoop 1.1 profile.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}.  The patch does not introduce lines longer than 100

    {color:red}-1 site{color}.  The patch appears to cause mvn site goal to fail.

     {color:red}-1 core tests{color}.  The patch failed these unit tests:
                       org.apache.hadoop.hbase.security.access.TestAccessController

Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8239//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8239//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8239//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-thrift.html
Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8239//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html
Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8239//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop2-compat.html
Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8239//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8239//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html
Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8239//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8239//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8239//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/8239//console

This message is automatically generated.

> 2-thread ChaosMonkey steps on its own toes
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-10175
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10175
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: test
>            Reporter: Sergey Shelukhin
>            Assignee: Sergey Shelukhin
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: HBASE-10175.patch
>
>
> ChaosMonkey with one destructive and one volatility (flush-compact-split-etc.) threads steps on its own toes and logs a lot of exceptions.
> A simple solution would be to catch most (or all), like NotServingRegionException, and log less (not a full callstack for example, it's not very useful anyway).
> A more complicated/complementary one would be to keep track which regions the destructive thread affects and use other regions for volatile one.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.4#6159)