[jira] [Commented] (PHOENIX-2975) CSVBulkLoad for local index only fails.

["James Taylor (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15898217#comment-15898217 ] 

James Taylor commented on PHOENIX-2975:
---------------------------------------

This looks like it may have been checked in. If so, would you mind resolving and updating the fixVersion as necessary, [~sergey.soldatov]?

> CSVBulkLoad for local index only fails.
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-2975
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-2975
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 4.8.0
>            Reporter: Sergey Soldatov
>            Assignee: Sergey Soldatov
>             Fix For: 4.10.0
>
>         Attachments: PHOENIX-2975.patch
>
>
> When we use bulk load for local index only we have a problem: in mapper we generate values using upsert statement, so uncommitted changes contains cells for both table and ALL local indexes. There is no easy way to separate them from each others. I.e. to check that we got KV for local index we may check that CF is "L#0" (can it be something else?), but if we have two local indexes, to find whether cell belongs to particular one  we need to look into rowkey values. 
> And so, here is the question - is there any real use case to load local index separately from the parent table using csv bulk load? I can't find any. Even if user forgot to create index before using csv bulk load, there is  indextool to load indexes which is doing it in the right way. 
> [~jamestaylor], [~rajeshbabu] any thoughts?
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)