You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@tomcat.apache.org by Ravi Chandra Suryavanshi <ra...@ericsson.com> on 2016/04/19 07:04:19 UTC
performance of tomcat 8 is less than tomcat 6
Hi,
I am using tomcat 6 in my product. I am planning to upgrade to tomcat 8 as tomcat is going to EoS in Dec-2016.
I have just taken the performance of Tomcat 8 and found the 70% less performance compared to tomcat 6. See the below results Tomcat 6 is giving 167473.2/s whereas tomcat 8 is giving 100436.6/s
I have just compared with two standalone tomcat which is just hitting the HelloWorld servlet available in example.
Kindly let me know what need to configure to boost the performance.
Following are my setup:
Java=Java 8
HttpClient=HttpClient4
Benchmark tool=jmeter
testserver:~# uname -a
Linux testserver 3.10.0-229.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Jan 29 18:37:38 EST 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
testserver:~# lscpu
Architecture: x86_64
CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit
Byte Order: Little Endian
CPU(s): 32
On-line CPU(s) list: 0-31
Thread(s) per core: 2
Core(s) per socket: 8
Socket(s): 2
NUMA node(s): 2
Vendor ID: GenuineIntel
CPU family: 6
Model: 63
Model name: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2640 v3 @ 2.60GHz
Stepping: 2
CPU MHz: 2600.000
BogoMIPS: 5210.53
Virtualization: VT-x
L1d cache: 32K
L1i cache: 32K
L2 cache: 256K
L3 cache: 20480K
NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0-7,16-23
NUMA node1 CPU(s): 8-15,24-31
testserver:~# vmstat -s
131730840 K total memory
5931052 K used memory
7126352 K active memory
5511616 K inactive memory
116069376 K free memory
20888 K buffer memory
9709520 K swap cache
11681788 K total swap
0 K used swap
11681788 K free swap
54069797 non-nice user cpu ticks
997 nice user cpu ticks
9712353 system cpu ticks
15112937897 idle cpu ticks
37101 IO-wait cpu ticks
73 IRQ cpu ticks
21245 softirq cpu ticks
0 stolen cpu ticks
8918100 pages paged in
267868897 pages paged out
0 pages swapped in
0 pages swapped out
4281536287 interrupts
4185543972 CPU context switches
1456296771 boot time
84815522 forks
Tomcat 6 performance
Linux 3.10.0-229.el7.x86_64 (testserver) 04/19/2016 _x86_64_ (32 CPU)
05:36:33 PM CPU %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
05:36:38 PM all 37.66 0.00 14.69 0.10 0.00 47.55
05:36:43 PM all 37.61 0.00 14.50 0.01 0.00 47.89
05:36:48 PM all 38.31 0.00 14.48 0.03 0.00 47.19
05:36:53 PM all 37.45 0.00 14.53 0.01 0.00 48.01
05:36:58 PM all 37.97 0.00 14.67 0.02 0.00 47.34
05:37:03 PM all 37.68 0.00 14.62 0.01 0.00 47.69
Created the tree successfully using HTTPRequest.jmx
Starting the test @ Wed Apr 13 17:34:58 CEST 2016 (1460561698701)
Waiting for possible shutdown message on port 4445
summary + 16181 in 1.3s = 12893.2/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 67 Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 3 Started: 3 Finished: 0
summary + 5187350 in 30s = 172911.7/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 31 Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0
summary = 5203531 in 31.3s = 166486.4/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 67 Err: 0 (0.00%)
summary + 5207210 in 30s = 173573.7/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 26 Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0
summary = 10410741 in 61.3s = 169957.4/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 67 Err: 0 (0.00%)
summary + 5039715 in 30s = 167990.5/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 13 Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0
summary = 15450456 in 91.3s = 169310.8/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 67 Err: 0 (0.00%)
summary + 5024196 in 30s = 167473.2/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 22 Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0
summary = 20474652 in 121s = 168856.1/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 67 Err: 0 (0.00%)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tomcat 8
Linux 3.10.0-229.el7.x86_64 (testserver) 04/19/2016 _x86_64_ (32 CPU)
06:14:36 PM CPU %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
06:14:41 PM all 24.10 0.00 9.39 0.01 0.00 66.51
06:14:46 PM all 24.62 0.00 9.25 0.00 0.00 66.13
06:14:51 PM all 24.66 0.00 9.12 0.01 0.00 66.22
06:14:56 PM all 23.96 0.00 9.36 0.08 0.00 66.60
06:15:01 PM all 24.78 0.00 9.52 0.01 0.00 65.69
06:15:06 PM all 23.86 0.00 9.24 0.03 0.00 66.87
Created the tree successfully using HTTPRequest.jmx
Starting the test @ Wed Apr 13 18:12:41 CEST 2016 (1460563961583)
Waiting for possible shutdown message on port 4445
summary + 1600892 in 18.4s = 87104.4/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 1040 Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0
summary + 3102671 in 30s = 103422.4/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 9 Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0
summary = 4703563 in 48.4s = 97223.2/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 1040 Err: 0 (0.00%)
summary + 3090174 in 30s = 103005.8/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 9 Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0
summary = 7793737 in 78.4s = 99436.5/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 1040 Err: 0 (0.00%)
summary + 3091476 in 30s = 103049.2/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 10 Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0
summary = 10885213 in 108s = 100436.6/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 1040 Err: 0 (0.00%)
Regards,
Ravi
RE: performance of tomcat 8 is less than tomcat 6
Posted by Ravi Chandra Suryavanshi <ra...@ericsson.com>.
Hi Christopher,
I am using simple HelloWorld servlet. Which will give "Hello World!" as response. There is no business logic in the servlet. Same code is executing on both the version of tomcat.
public class HelloWorld extends HttpServlet {
public void doGet(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response)
throws IOException, ServletException
{
response.setContentType("text/html");
PrintWriter out = response.getWriter();
out.println("<html>");
out.println("<head>");
out.println("<title>Hello World!</title>");
out.println("</head>");
out.println("<body>");
out.println("<h1>Hello World!</h1>");
out.println("</body>");
out.println("</html>");
}
}
-Ravi
-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:chris@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 7:37 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: performance of tomcat 8 is less than tomcat 6
Ravi,
On 4/20/16 6:55 AM, Ravi Chandra Suryavanshi wrote:
> Yes I tried the NIO and NIO2 but not seen much difference. The TPS
> only increased 3K with NIO2.
What is your test case?
-chris
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: performance of tomcat 8 is less than tomcat 6
Posted by Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net>.
Ravi,
On 4/20/16 6:55 AM, Ravi Chandra Suryavanshi wrote:
> Yes I tried the NIO and NIO2 but not seen much difference. The TPS
> only increased 3K with NIO2.
What is your test case?
-chris
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: performance of tomcat 8 is less than tomcat 6
Posted by Felix Schumacher <fe...@internetallee.de>.
Am 20.04.2016 um 12:55 schrieb Ravi Chandra Suryavanshi:
> Yes I tried the NIO and NIO2 but not seen much difference. The TPS only increased 3K with NIO2.
Can you try it with nio enabled in tomcat 6 and see, if that is slower,
too? Same with bio and tomcat 8 and see if it is better?
Regards,
Felix
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Igor Cicimov [mailto:icicimov@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 4:21 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: performance of tomcat 8 is less than tomcat 6
>
> On 20 Apr 2016 1:30 pm, "Ravi Chandra Suryavanshi" < ravi.chandra.suryavanshi@ericsson.com> wrote:
>> Hi Christopher,
>> PFA, the requested XMLs. Just want to highlight that tomcat 8 is not
> able to use the CPU usage. I have tried maxThread 200,300,400 but result is same sometimes even less TPS.
>> Regards,
>> Ravi
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:chris@christopherschultz.net]
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 7:38 PM
>> To: Tomcat Users List
>> Subject: Re: performance of tomcat 8 is less than tomcat 6
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Ravi,
>>
>> On 4/19/16 1:04 AM, Ravi Chandra Suryavanshi wrote:
>>> Hi, I am using tomcat 6 in my product. I am planning to upgrade to
>>> tomcat 8 as tomcat is going to EoS in Dec-2016. I have just taken
>>> the performance of Tomcat 8 and found the 70% less performance
>>> compared to tomcat 6. See the below results Tomcat 6 is giving
>>> 167473.2/s whereas tomcat 8 is giving 100436.6/s I have just
>>> compared with two standalone tomcat which is just hitting the
>>> HelloWorld servlet available in example.
>>>
>>> Kindly let me know what need to configure to boost the performance.
>>>
>>> Following are my setup: Java=Java 8 HttpClient=HttpClient4 Benchmark
>>> tool=jmeter
>>>
>>> testserver:~# uname -a Linux testserver 3.10.0-229.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP
>>> Thu Jan 29 18:37:38 EST 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> testserver:~# lscpu Architecture: x86_64 CPU op-mode(s):
>>> 32-bit, 64-bit Byte Order: Little Endian CPU(s):
>>> 32 On-line CPU(s) list: 0-31 Thread(s) per core: 2 Core(s) per
>>> socket: 8 Socket(s): 2 NUMA node(s): 2
>>> Vendor ID: GenuineIntel CPU family: 6 Model:
>>> 63 Model name: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2640 v3 @
>>> 2.60GHz Stepping: 2 CPU MHz: 2600.000
>>> BogoMIPS: 5210.53 Virtualization: VT-x L1d
>>> cache: 32K L1i cache: 32K L2 cache:
>>> 256K L3 cache: 20480K NUMA node0 CPU(s):
>>> 0-7,16-23 NUMA node1 CPU(s): 8-15,24-31
>>>
>>> testserver:~# vmstat -s 131730840 K total memory 5931052 K used
>>> memory
>>> 7126352 K active memory 5511616 K inactive memory 116069376 K free
>>> memory 20888 K buffer memory 9709520 K swap cache 11681788 K total
>>> swap 0 K used swap 11681788 K free swap 54069797 non-nice user cpu
>>> ticks 997 nice user cpu ticks 9712353 system cpu ticks
>>> 15112937897 idle cpu ticks 37101 IO-wait cpu ticks 73 IRQ cpu ticks
>>> 21245 softirq cpu ticks 0 stolen cpu ticks 8918100 pages paged in
>>> 267868897 pages paged out 0 pages swapped in 0 pages swapped out
>>> 4281536287 interrupts 4185543972 CPU context switches
>>> 1456296771 boot time 84815522 forks
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Tomcat 6 performance
>>>
>>> Linux 3.10.0-229.el7.x86_64 (testserver) 04/19/2016
>>> _x86_64_ (32 CPU) 05:36:33 PM CPU %user %nice
>>> %system %iowait %steal %idle 05:36:38 PM all 37.66
>>> 0.00 14.69 0.10 0.00 47.55 05:36:43 PM all
>>> 37.61 0.00 14.50 0.01 0.00 47.89 05:36:48 PM
>>> all 38.31 0.00 14.48 0.03 0.00 47.19
>>> 05:36:53 PM all 37.45 0.00 14.53 0.01
>>> 0.00 48.01 05:36:58 PM all 37.97 0.00 14.67
>>> 0.02 0.00 47.34 05:37:03 PM all 37.68 0.00
>>> 14.62 0.01 0.00 47.69
>>>
>>> Created the tree successfully using HTTPRequest.jmx Starting the
>>> test @ Wed Apr 13 17:34:58 CEST 2016 (1460561698701) Waiting for
>>> possible shutdown message on port 4445 summary + 16181 in 1.3s =
>>> 12893.2/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 67 Err: 0 (0.00%)
>>> Active: 3 Started: 3 Finished: 0 summary + 5187350 in 30s =
>>> 172911.7/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 31 Err: 0 (0.00%)
>>> Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0 summary = 5203531 in 31.3s =
>>> 166486.4/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 67 Err: 0 (0.00%)
>>> summary + 5207210 in 30s = 173573.7/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max:
>>> 26 Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0 summary =
>>> 10410741 in 61.3s = 169957.4/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 67
>>> Err: 0 (0.00%) summary + 5039715 in 30s = 167990.5/s Avg:
>>> 0 Min: 0 Max: 13 Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24
>>> Finished: 0 summary = 15450456 in 91.3s = 169310.8/s Avg: 0
>>> Min: 0 Max: 67 Err: 0 (0.00%) summary + 5024196 in
>>> 30s = 167473.2/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 22 Err: 0
>>> (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0 summary = 20474652 in
>>> 121s = 168856.1/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 67 Err: 0
>>> (0.00%)
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> --
>> -
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --
>> - ----------------
>>>
>> tomcat 8
>>> Linux 3.10.0-229.el7.x86_64 (testserver) 04/19/2016
>>> _x86_64_ (32 CPU)
>>>
>>> 06:14:36 PM CPU %user %nice %system %iowait
>>> %steal %idle 06:14:41 PM all 24.10 0.00 9.39
>>> 0.01 0.00 66.51 06:14:46 PM all 24.62 0.00
>>> 9.25 0.00 0.00 66.13 06:14:51 PM all 24.66
>>> 0.00 9.12 0.01 0.00 66.22 06:14:56 PM all
>>> 23.96 0.00 9.36 0.08 0.00 66.60 06:15:01 PM
>>> all 24.78 0.00 9.52 0.01 0.00 65.69
>>> 06:15:06 PM all 23.86 0.00 9.24 0.03
>>> 0.00 66.87
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Created the tree successfully using HTTPRequest.jmx Starting the
>>> test @ Wed Apr 13 18:12:41 CEST 2016 (1460563961583) Waiting for
>>> possible shutdown message on port 4445 summary + 1600892 in 18.4s
>>> = 87104.4/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 1040 Err: 0 (0.00%)
>>> Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0 summary + 3102671 in 30s =
>>> 103422.4/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 9 Err: 0 (0.00%)
>>> Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0 summary = 4703563 in 48.4s =
>>> 97223.2/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 1040 Err: 0 (0.00%)
>>> summary + 3090174 in 30s = 103005.8/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max:
>>> 9 Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0 summary =
>>> 7793737 in 78.4s = 99436.5/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 1040 Err:
>>> 0 (0.00%) summary + 3091476 in 30s = 103049.2/s Avg: 0 Min:
>>> 0 Max: 10 Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0
>>> summary = 10885213 in 108s = 100436.6/s Avg: 0 Min: 0
>>> Max: 1040 Err: 0 (0.00%)
>>>
>>> Regards, Ravi
>>>
>>>
>> Can you post your server.xml configurations for each of Tomcat 6 and
> Tomcat 8?
>> - -chris
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>>
>> iEYEARECAAYFAlcWO90ACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PBI+wCZAVSg1v3GulO2x8Uv5f6dWcfj
>> FwMAoMMK6pwvZuwUckXM1sW/p2y1IhHd
>> =Rj7o
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
> Did you try the nio connector instead nio2 ?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
RE: performance of tomcat 8 is less than tomcat 6
Posted by Ravi Chandra Suryavanshi <ra...@ericsson.com>.
Yes I tried the NIO and NIO2 but not seen much difference. The TPS only increased 3K with NIO2.
-----Original Message-----
From: Igor Cicimov [mailto:icicimov@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 4:21 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: performance of tomcat 8 is less than tomcat 6
On 20 Apr 2016 1:30 pm, "Ravi Chandra Suryavanshi" < ravi.chandra.suryavanshi@ericsson.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Christopher,
> PFA, the requested XMLs. Just want to highlight that tomcat 8 is not
able to use the CPU usage. I have tried maxThread 200,300,400 but result is same sometimes even less TPS.
> Regards,
> Ravi
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:chris@christopherschultz.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 7:38 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: performance of tomcat 8 is less than tomcat 6
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ravi,
>
> On 4/19/16 1:04 AM, Ravi Chandra Suryavanshi wrote:
> > Hi, I am using tomcat 6 in my product. I am planning to upgrade to
> > tomcat 8 as tomcat is going to EoS in Dec-2016. I have just taken
> > the performance of Tomcat 8 and found the 70% less performance
> > compared to tomcat 6. See the below results Tomcat 6 is giving
> > 167473.2/s whereas tomcat 8 is giving 100436.6/s I have just
> > compared with two standalone tomcat which is just hitting the
> > HelloWorld servlet available in example.
> >
> > Kindly let me know what need to configure to boost the performance.
> >
> > Following are my setup: Java=Java 8 HttpClient=HttpClient4 Benchmark
> > tool=jmeter
> >
> > testserver:~# uname -a Linux testserver 3.10.0-229.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP
> > Thu Jan 29 18:37:38 EST 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> >
> >
> >
> > testserver:~# lscpu Architecture: x86_64 CPU op-mode(s):
> > 32-bit, 64-bit Byte Order: Little Endian CPU(s):
> > 32 On-line CPU(s) list: 0-31 Thread(s) per core: 2 Core(s) per
> > socket: 8 Socket(s): 2 NUMA node(s): 2
> > Vendor ID: GenuineIntel CPU family: 6 Model:
> > 63 Model name: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2640 v3 @
> > 2.60GHz Stepping: 2 CPU MHz: 2600.000
> > BogoMIPS: 5210.53 Virtualization: VT-x L1d
> > cache: 32K L1i cache: 32K L2 cache:
> > 256K L3 cache: 20480K NUMA node0 CPU(s):
> > 0-7,16-23 NUMA node1 CPU(s): 8-15,24-31
> >
> > testserver:~# vmstat -s 131730840 K total memory 5931052 K used
> > memory
> > 7126352 K active memory 5511616 K inactive memory 116069376 K free
> > memory 20888 K buffer memory 9709520 K swap cache 11681788 K total
> > swap 0 K used swap 11681788 K free swap 54069797 non-nice user cpu
> > ticks 997 nice user cpu ticks 9712353 system cpu ticks
> > 15112937897 idle cpu ticks 37101 IO-wait cpu ticks 73 IRQ cpu ticks
> > 21245 softirq cpu ticks 0 stolen cpu ticks 8918100 pages paged in
> > 267868897 pages paged out 0 pages swapped in 0 pages swapped out
> > 4281536287 interrupts 4185543972 CPU context switches
> > 1456296771 boot time 84815522 forks
> >
> >
> >
> > Tomcat 6 performance
> >
> > Linux 3.10.0-229.el7.x86_64 (testserver) 04/19/2016
> > _x86_64_ (32 CPU) 05:36:33 PM CPU %user %nice
> > %system %iowait %steal %idle 05:36:38 PM all 37.66
> > 0.00 14.69 0.10 0.00 47.55 05:36:43 PM all
> > 37.61 0.00 14.50 0.01 0.00 47.89 05:36:48 PM
> > all 38.31 0.00 14.48 0.03 0.00 47.19
> > 05:36:53 PM all 37.45 0.00 14.53 0.01
> > 0.00 48.01 05:36:58 PM all 37.97 0.00 14.67
> > 0.02 0.00 47.34 05:37:03 PM all 37.68 0.00
> > 14.62 0.01 0.00 47.69
> >
> > Created the tree successfully using HTTPRequest.jmx Starting the
> > test @ Wed Apr 13 17:34:58 CEST 2016 (1460561698701) Waiting for
> > possible shutdown message on port 4445 summary + 16181 in 1.3s =
> > 12893.2/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 67 Err: 0 (0.00%)
> > Active: 3 Started: 3 Finished: 0 summary + 5187350 in 30s =
> > 172911.7/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 31 Err: 0 (0.00%)
> > Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0 summary = 5203531 in 31.3s =
> > 166486.4/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 67 Err: 0 (0.00%)
> > summary + 5207210 in 30s = 173573.7/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max:
> > 26 Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0 summary =
> > 10410741 in 61.3s = 169957.4/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 67
> > Err: 0 (0.00%) summary + 5039715 in 30s = 167990.5/s Avg:
> > 0 Min: 0 Max: 13 Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24
> > Finished: 0 summary = 15450456 in 91.3s = 169310.8/s Avg: 0
> > Min: 0 Max: 67 Err: 0 (0.00%) summary + 5024196 in
> > 30s = 167473.2/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 22 Err: 0
> > (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0 summary = 20474652 in
> > 121s = 168856.1/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 67 Err: 0
> > (0.00%)
> >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --
> -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> - ----------------
> >
> >
> tomcat 8
> >
> > Linux 3.10.0-229.el7.x86_64 (testserver) 04/19/2016
> > _x86_64_ (32 CPU)
> >
> > 06:14:36 PM CPU %user %nice %system %iowait
> > %steal %idle 06:14:41 PM all 24.10 0.00 9.39
> > 0.01 0.00 66.51 06:14:46 PM all 24.62 0.00
> > 9.25 0.00 0.00 66.13 06:14:51 PM all 24.66
> > 0.00 9.12 0.01 0.00 66.22 06:14:56 PM all
> > 23.96 0.00 9.36 0.08 0.00 66.60 06:15:01 PM
> > all 24.78 0.00 9.52 0.01 0.00 65.69
> > 06:15:06 PM all 23.86 0.00 9.24 0.03
> > 0.00 66.87
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Created the tree successfully using HTTPRequest.jmx Starting the
> > test @ Wed Apr 13 18:12:41 CEST 2016 (1460563961583) Waiting for
> > possible shutdown message on port 4445 summary + 1600892 in 18.4s
> > = 87104.4/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 1040 Err: 0 (0.00%)
> > Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0 summary + 3102671 in 30s =
> > 103422.4/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 9 Err: 0 (0.00%)
> > Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0 summary = 4703563 in 48.4s =
> > 97223.2/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 1040 Err: 0 (0.00%)
> > summary + 3090174 in 30s = 103005.8/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max:
> > 9 Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0 summary =
> > 7793737 in 78.4s = 99436.5/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 1040 Err:
> > 0 (0.00%) summary + 3091476 in 30s = 103049.2/s Avg: 0 Min:
> > 0 Max: 10 Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0
> > summary = 10885213 in 108s = 100436.6/s Avg: 0 Min: 0
> > Max: 1040 Err: 0 (0.00%)
> >
> > Regards, Ravi
> >
> >
>
> Can you post your server.xml configurations for each of Tomcat 6 and
Tomcat 8?
>
> - -chris
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlcWO90ACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PBI+wCZAVSg1v3GulO2x8Uv5f6dWcfj
> FwMAoMMK6pwvZuwUckXM1sW/p2y1IhHd
> =Rj7o
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
Did you try the nio connector instead nio2 ?
RE: performance of tomcat 8 is less than tomcat 6
Posted by Igor Cicimov <ic...@gmail.com>.
On 20 Apr 2016 1:30 pm, "Ravi Chandra Suryavanshi" <
ravi.chandra.suryavanshi@ericsson.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Christopher,
> PFA, the requested XMLs. Just want to highlight that tomcat 8 is not
able to use the CPU usage. I have tried maxThread 200,300,400 but result is
same sometimes even less TPS.
> Regards,
> Ravi
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:chris@christopherschultz.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 7:38 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: performance of tomcat 8 is less than tomcat 6
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ravi,
>
> On 4/19/16 1:04 AM, Ravi Chandra Suryavanshi wrote:
> > Hi, I am using tomcat 6 in my product. I am planning to upgrade to
> > tomcat 8 as tomcat is going to EoS in Dec-2016. I have just taken the
> > performance of Tomcat 8 and found the 70% less performance compared to
> > tomcat 6. See the below results Tomcat 6 is giving 167473.2/s whereas
> > tomcat 8 is giving 100436.6/s I have just compared with two standalone
> > tomcat which is just hitting the HelloWorld servlet available in
> > example.
> >
> > Kindly let me know what need to configure to boost the performance.
> >
> > Following are my setup: Java=Java 8 HttpClient=HttpClient4 Benchmark
> > tool=jmeter
> >
> > testserver:~# uname -a Linux testserver 3.10.0-229.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP
> > Thu Jan 29 18:37:38 EST 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> >
> >
> >
> > testserver:~# lscpu Architecture: x86_64 CPU op-mode(s):
> > 32-bit, 64-bit Byte Order: Little Endian CPU(s):
> > 32 On-line CPU(s) list: 0-31 Thread(s) per core: 2 Core(s) per
> > socket: 8 Socket(s): 2 NUMA node(s): 2
> > Vendor ID: GenuineIntel CPU family: 6 Model:
> > 63 Model name: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2640 v3 @
> > 2.60GHz Stepping: 2 CPU MHz: 2600.000
> > BogoMIPS: 5210.53 Virtualization: VT-x L1d
> > cache: 32K L1i cache: 32K L2 cache:
> > 256K L3 cache: 20480K NUMA node0 CPU(s):
> > 0-7,16-23 NUMA node1 CPU(s): 8-15,24-31
> >
> > testserver:~# vmstat -s 131730840 K total memory 5931052 K used memory
> > 7126352 K active memory 5511616 K inactive memory 116069376 K free
> > memory 20888 K buffer memory 9709520 K swap cache 11681788 K total
> > swap 0 K used swap 11681788 K free swap 54069797 non-nice user cpu
> > ticks 997 nice user cpu ticks 9712353 system cpu ticks
> > 15112937897 idle cpu ticks 37101 IO-wait cpu ticks 73 IRQ cpu ticks
> > 21245 softirq cpu ticks 0 stolen cpu ticks 8918100 pages paged in
> > 267868897 pages paged out 0 pages swapped in 0 pages swapped out
> > 4281536287 interrupts 4185543972 CPU context switches
> > 1456296771 boot time 84815522 forks
> >
> >
> >
> > Tomcat 6 performance
> >
> > Linux 3.10.0-229.el7.x86_64 (testserver) 04/19/2016
> > _x86_64_ (32 CPU) 05:36:33 PM CPU %user %nice
> > %system %iowait %steal %idle 05:36:38 PM all 37.66
> > 0.00 14.69 0.10 0.00 47.55 05:36:43 PM all
> > 37.61 0.00 14.50 0.01 0.00 47.89 05:36:48 PM
> > all 38.31 0.00 14.48 0.03 0.00 47.19
> > 05:36:53 PM all 37.45 0.00 14.53 0.01
> > 0.00 48.01 05:36:58 PM all 37.97 0.00 14.67
> > 0.02 0.00 47.34 05:37:03 PM all 37.68 0.00
> > 14.62 0.01 0.00 47.69
> >
> > Created the tree successfully using HTTPRequest.jmx Starting the test
> > @ Wed Apr 13 17:34:58 CEST 2016 (1460561698701) Waiting for
> > possible shutdown message on port 4445 summary + 16181 in 1.3s =
> > 12893.2/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 67 Err: 0 (0.00%)
> > Active: 3 Started: 3 Finished: 0 summary + 5187350 in 30s =
> > 172911.7/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 31 Err: 0 (0.00%)
> > Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0 summary = 5203531 in 31.3s =
> > 166486.4/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 67 Err: 0 (0.00%)
> > summary + 5207210 in 30s = 173573.7/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max:
> > 26 Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0 summary =
> > 10410741 in 61.3s = 169957.4/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 67
> > Err: 0 (0.00%) summary + 5039715 in 30s = 167990.5/s Avg:
> > 0 Min: 0 Max: 13 Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24
> > Finished: 0 summary = 15450456 in 91.3s = 169310.8/s Avg: 0
> > Min: 0 Max: 67 Err: 0 (0.00%) summary + 5024196 in
> > 30s = 167473.2/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 22 Err: 0
> > (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0 summary = 20474652 in
> > 121s = 168856.1/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 67 Err: 0
> > (0.00%)
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> - ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> - ----------------
> >
> >
> tomcat 8
> >
> > Linux 3.10.0-229.el7.x86_64 (testserver) 04/19/2016
> > _x86_64_ (32 CPU)
> >
> > 06:14:36 PM CPU %user %nice %system %iowait
> > %steal %idle 06:14:41 PM all 24.10 0.00 9.39
> > 0.01 0.00 66.51 06:14:46 PM all 24.62 0.00
> > 9.25 0.00 0.00 66.13 06:14:51 PM all 24.66
> > 0.00 9.12 0.01 0.00 66.22 06:14:56 PM all
> > 23.96 0.00 9.36 0.08 0.00 66.60 06:15:01 PM
> > all 24.78 0.00 9.52 0.01 0.00 65.69
> > 06:15:06 PM all 23.86 0.00 9.24 0.03
> > 0.00 66.87
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Created the tree successfully using HTTPRequest.jmx Starting the test
> > @ Wed Apr 13 18:12:41 CEST 2016 (1460563961583) Waiting for possible
> > shutdown message on port 4445 summary + 1600892 in 18.4s
> > = 87104.4/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 1040 Err: 0 (0.00%)
> > Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0 summary + 3102671 in 30s =
> > 103422.4/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 9 Err: 0 (0.00%)
> > Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0 summary = 4703563 in 48.4s =
> > 97223.2/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 1040 Err: 0 (0.00%)
> > summary + 3090174 in 30s = 103005.8/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max:
> > 9 Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0 summary =
> > 7793737 in 78.4s = 99436.5/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 1040 Err:
> > 0 (0.00%) summary + 3091476 in 30s = 103049.2/s Avg: 0 Min:
> > 0 Max: 10 Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0
> > summary = 10885213 in 108s = 100436.6/s Avg: 0 Min: 0
> > Max: 1040 Err: 0 (0.00%)
> >
> > Regards, Ravi
> >
> >
>
> Can you post your server.xml configurations for each of Tomcat 6 and
Tomcat 8?
>
> - -chris
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlcWO90ACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PBI+wCZAVSg1v3GulO2x8Uv5f6dWcfj
> FwMAoMMK6pwvZuwUckXM1sW/p2y1IhHd
> =Rj7o
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
Did you try the nio connector instead nio2 ?
RE: performance of tomcat 8 is less than tomcat 6
Posted by Ravi Chandra Suryavanshi <ra...@ericsson.com>.
Hi Christopher,
PFA, the requested XMLs. Just want to highlight that tomcat 8 is not able to use the CPU usage. I have tried maxThread 200,300,400 but result is same sometimes even less TPS.
Regards,
Ravi
-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:chris@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 7:38 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: performance of tomcat 8 is less than tomcat 6
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Ravi,
On 4/19/16 1:04 AM, Ravi Chandra Suryavanshi wrote:
> Hi, I am using tomcat 6 in my product. I am planning to upgrade to
> tomcat 8 as tomcat is going to EoS in Dec-2016. I have just taken the
> performance of Tomcat 8 and found the 70% less performance compared to
> tomcat 6. See the below results Tomcat 6 is giving 167473.2/s whereas
> tomcat 8 is giving 100436.6/s I have just compared with two standalone
> tomcat which is just hitting the HelloWorld servlet available in
> example.
>
> Kindly let me know what need to configure to boost the performance.
>
> Following are my setup: Java=Java 8 HttpClient=HttpClient4 Benchmark
> tool=jmeter
>
> testserver:~# uname -a Linux testserver 3.10.0-229.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP
> Thu Jan 29 18:37:38 EST 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
>
>
> testserver:~# lscpu Architecture: x86_64 CPU op-mode(s):
> 32-bit, 64-bit Byte Order: Little Endian CPU(s):
> 32 On-line CPU(s) list: 0-31 Thread(s) per core: 2 Core(s) per
> socket: 8 Socket(s): 2 NUMA node(s): 2
> Vendor ID: GenuineIntel CPU family: 6 Model:
> 63 Model name: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2640 v3 @
> 2.60GHz Stepping: 2 CPU MHz: 2600.000
> BogoMIPS: 5210.53 Virtualization: VT-x L1d
> cache: 32K L1i cache: 32K L2 cache:
> 256K L3 cache: 20480K NUMA node0 CPU(s):
> 0-7,16-23 NUMA node1 CPU(s): 8-15,24-31
>
> testserver:~# vmstat -s 131730840 K total memory 5931052 K used memory
> 7126352 K active memory 5511616 K inactive memory 116069376 K free
> memory 20888 K buffer memory 9709520 K swap cache 11681788 K total
> swap 0 K used swap 11681788 K free swap 54069797 non-nice user cpu
> ticks 997 nice user cpu ticks 9712353 system cpu ticks
> 15112937897 idle cpu ticks 37101 IO-wait cpu ticks 73 IRQ cpu ticks
> 21245 softirq cpu ticks 0 stolen cpu ticks 8918100 pages paged in
> 267868897 pages paged out 0 pages swapped in 0 pages swapped out
> 4281536287 interrupts 4185543972 CPU context switches
> 1456296771 boot time 84815522 forks
>
>
>
> Tomcat 6 performance
>
> Linux 3.10.0-229.el7.x86_64 (testserver) 04/19/2016
> _x86_64_ (32 CPU) 05:36:33 PM CPU %user %nice
> %system %iowait %steal %idle 05:36:38 PM all 37.66
> 0.00 14.69 0.10 0.00 47.55 05:36:43 PM all
> 37.61 0.00 14.50 0.01 0.00 47.89 05:36:48 PM
> all 38.31 0.00 14.48 0.03 0.00 47.19
> 05:36:53 PM all 37.45 0.00 14.53 0.01
> 0.00 48.01 05:36:58 PM all 37.97 0.00 14.67
> 0.02 0.00 47.34 05:37:03 PM all 37.68 0.00
> 14.62 0.01 0.00 47.69
>
> Created the tree successfully using HTTPRequest.jmx Starting the test
> @ Wed Apr 13 17:34:58 CEST 2016 (1460561698701) Waiting for
> possible shutdown message on port 4445 summary + 16181 in 1.3s =
> 12893.2/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 67 Err: 0 (0.00%)
> Active: 3 Started: 3 Finished: 0 summary + 5187350 in 30s =
> 172911.7/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 31 Err: 0 (0.00%)
> Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0 summary = 5203531 in 31.3s =
> 166486.4/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 67 Err: 0 (0.00%)
> summary + 5207210 in 30s = 173573.7/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max:
> 26 Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0 summary =
> 10410741 in 61.3s = 169957.4/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 67
> Err: 0 (0.00%) summary + 5039715 in 30s = 167990.5/s Avg:
> 0 Min: 0 Max: 13 Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24
> Finished: 0 summary = 15450456 in 91.3s = 169310.8/s Avg: 0
> Min: 0 Max: 67 Err: 0 (0.00%) summary + 5024196 in
> 30s = 167473.2/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 22 Err: 0
> (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0 summary = 20474652 in
> 121s = 168856.1/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 67 Err: 0
> (0.00%)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
- ----------------
>
>
tomcat 8
>
> Linux 3.10.0-229.el7.x86_64 (testserver) 04/19/2016
> _x86_64_ (32 CPU)
>
> 06:14:36 PM CPU %user %nice %system %iowait
> %steal %idle 06:14:41 PM all 24.10 0.00 9.39
> 0.01 0.00 66.51 06:14:46 PM all 24.62 0.00
> 9.25 0.00 0.00 66.13 06:14:51 PM all 24.66
> 0.00 9.12 0.01 0.00 66.22 06:14:56 PM all
> 23.96 0.00 9.36 0.08 0.00 66.60 06:15:01 PM
> all 24.78 0.00 9.52 0.01 0.00 65.69
> 06:15:06 PM all 23.86 0.00 9.24 0.03
> 0.00 66.87
>
>
>
>
>
> Created the tree successfully using HTTPRequest.jmx Starting the test
> @ Wed Apr 13 18:12:41 CEST 2016 (1460563961583) Waiting for possible
> shutdown message on port 4445 summary + 1600892 in 18.4s
> = 87104.4/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 1040 Err: 0 (0.00%)
> Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0 summary + 3102671 in 30s =
> 103422.4/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 9 Err: 0 (0.00%)
> Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0 summary = 4703563 in 48.4s =
> 97223.2/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 1040 Err: 0 (0.00%)
> summary + 3090174 in 30s = 103005.8/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max:
> 9 Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0 summary =
> 7793737 in 78.4s = 99436.5/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 1040 Err:
> 0 (0.00%) summary + 3091476 in 30s = 103049.2/s Avg: 0 Min:
> 0 Max: 10 Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0
> summary = 10885213 in 108s = 100436.6/s Avg: 0 Min: 0
> Max: 1040 Err: 0 (0.00%)
>
> Regards, Ravi
>
>
Can you post your server.xml configurations for each of Tomcat 6 and Tomcat 8?
- -chris
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlcWO90ACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PBI+wCZAVSg1v3GulO2x8Uv5f6dWcfj
FwMAoMMK6pwvZuwUckXM1sW/p2y1IhHd
=Rj7o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: performance of tomcat 8 is less than tomcat 6
Posted by Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Ravi,
On 4/19/16 1:04 AM, Ravi Chandra Suryavanshi wrote:
> Hi, I am using tomcat 6 in my product. I am planning to upgrade to
> tomcat 8 as tomcat is going to EoS in Dec-2016. I have just taken
> the performance of Tomcat 8 and found the 70% less performance
> compared to tomcat 6. See the below results Tomcat 6 is giving
> 167473.2/s whereas tomcat 8 is giving 100436.6/s I have just
> compared with two standalone tomcat which is just hitting the
> HelloWorld servlet available in example.
>
> Kindly let me know what need to configure to boost the
> performance.
>
> Following are my setup: Java=Java 8 HttpClient=HttpClient4
> Benchmark tool=jmeter
>
> testserver:~# uname -a Linux testserver 3.10.0-229.el7.x86_64 #1
> SMP Thu Jan 29 18:37:38 EST 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
>
>
> testserver:~# lscpu Architecture: x86_64 CPU op-mode(s):
> 32-bit, 64-bit Byte Order: Little Endian CPU(s):
> 32 On-line CPU(s) list: 0-31 Thread(s) per core: 2 Core(s) per
> socket: 8 Socket(s): 2 NUMA node(s): 2
> Vendor ID: GenuineIntel CPU family: 6 Model:
> 63 Model name: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2640 v3 @
> 2.60GHz Stepping: 2 CPU MHz: 2600.000
> BogoMIPS: 5210.53 Virtualization: VT-x L1d
> cache: 32K L1i cache: 32K L2 cache:
> 256K L3 cache: 20480K NUMA node0 CPU(s):
> 0-7,16-23 NUMA node1 CPU(s): 8-15,24-31
>
> testserver:~# vmstat -s 131730840 K total memory 5931052 K used
> memory 7126352 K active memory 5511616 K inactive memory 116069376
> K free memory 20888 K buffer memory 9709520 K swap cache 11681788 K
> total swap 0 K used swap 11681788 K free swap 54069797 non-nice
> user cpu ticks 997 nice user cpu ticks 9712353 system cpu ticks
> 15112937897 idle cpu ticks 37101 IO-wait cpu ticks 73 IRQ cpu
> ticks 21245 softirq cpu ticks 0 stolen cpu ticks 8918100 pages
> paged in 267868897 pages paged out 0 pages swapped in 0 pages
> swapped out 4281536287 interrupts 4185543972 CPU context switches
> 1456296771 boot time 84815522 forks
>
>
>
> Tomcat 6 performance
>
> Linux 3.10.0-229.el7.x86_64 (testserver) 04/19/2016
> _x86_64_ (32 CPU) 05:36:33 PM CPU %user %nice
> %system %iowait %steal %idle 05:36:38 PM all 37.66
> 0.00 14.69 0.10 0.00 47.55 05:36:43 PM all
> 37.61 0.00 14.50 0.01 0.00 47.89 05:36:48 PM
> all 38.31 0.00 14.48 0.03 0.00 47.19
> 05:36:53 PM all 37.45 0.00 14.53 0.01
> 0.00 48.01 05:36:58 PM all 37.97 0.00 14.67
> 0.02 0.00 47.34 05:37:03 PM all 37.68 0.00
> 14.62 0.01 0.00 47.69
>
> Created the tree successfully using HTTPRequest.jmx Starting the
> test @ Wed Apr 13 17:34:58 CEST 2016 (1460561698701) Waiting for
> possible shutdown message on port 4445 summary + 16181 in 1.3s =
> 12893.2/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 67 Err: 0 (0.00%)
> Active: 3 Started: 3 Finished: 0 summary + 5187350 in 30s =
> 172911.7/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 31 Err: 0 (0.00%)
> Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0 summary = 5203531 in 31.3s =
> 166486.4/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 67 Err: 0 (0.00%)
> summary + 5207210 in 30s = 173573.7/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max:
> 26 Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0 summary =
> 10410741 in 61.3s = 169957.4/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 67
> Err: 0 (0.00%) summary + 5039715 in 30s = 167990.5/s Avg:
> 0 Min: 0 Max: 13 Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24
> Finished: 0 summary = 15450456 in 91.3s = 169310.8/s Avg: 0
> Min: 0 Max: 67 Err: 0 (0.00%) summary + 5024196 in
> 30s = 167473.2/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 22 Err: 0
> (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0 summary = 20474652 in
> 121s = 168856.1/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 67 Err: 0
> (0.00%)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
- ----------------
>
>
tomcat 8
>
> Linux 3.10.0-229.el7.x86_64 (testserver) 04/19/2016
> _x86_64_ (32 CPU)
>
> 06:14:36 PM CPU %user %nice %system %iowait
> %steal %idle 06:14:41 PM all 24.10 0.00 9.39
> 0.01 0.00 66.51 06:14:46 PM all 24.62 0.00
> 9.25 0.00 0.00 66.13 06:14:51 PM all 24.66
> 0.00 9.12 0.01 0.00 66.22 06:14:56 PM all
> 23.96 0.00 9.36 0.08 0.00 66.60 06:15:01 PM
> all 24.78 0.00 9.52 0.01 0.00 65.69
> 06:15:06 PM all 23.86 0.00 9.24 0.03
> 0.00 66.87
>
>
>
>
>
> Created the tree successfully using HTTPRequest.jmx Starting the
> test @ Wed Apr 13 18:12:41 CEST 2016 (1460563961583) Waiting for
> possible shutdown message on port 4445 summary + 1600892 in 18.4s
> = 87104.4/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 1040 Err: 0 (0.00%)
> Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0 summary + 3102671 in 30s =
> 103422.4/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 9 Err: 0 (0.00%)
> Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0 summary = 4703563 in 48.4s =
> 97223.2/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 1040 Err: 0 (0.00%)
> summary + 3090174 in 30s = 103005.8/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max:
> 9 Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0 summary =
> 7793737 in 78.4s = 99436.5/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 1040 Err:
> 0 (0.00%) summary + 3091476 in 30s = 103049.2/s Avg: 0 Min:
> 0 Max: 10 Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0
> summary = 10885213 in 108s = 100436.6/s Avg: 0 Min: 0
> Max: 1040 Err: 0 (0.00%)
>
> Regards, Ravi
>
>
Can you post your server.xml configurations for each of Tomcat 6 and
Tomcat 8?
- -chris
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlcWO90ACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PBI+wCZAVSg1v3GulO2x8Uv5f6dWcfj
FwMAoMMK6pwvZuwUckXM1sW/p2y1IhHd
=Rj7o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: performance of tomcat 8 is less than tomcat 6
Posted by Daniel Savard <da...@gmail.com>.
2016-04-19 1:04 GMT-04:00 Ravi Chandra Suryavanshi <
ravi.chandra.suryavanshi@ericsson.com>:
> Hi,
> I am using tomcat 6 in my product. I am planning to upgrade to tomcat 8 as
> tomcat is going to EoS in Dec-2016.
> I have just taken the performance of Tomcat 8 and found the 70% less
> performance compared to tomcat 6. See the below results Tomcat 6 is giving
> 167473.2/s whereas tomcat 8 is giving 100436.6/s
> I have just compared with two standalone tomcat which is just hitting the
> HelloWorld servlet available in example.
>
> Kindly let me know what need to configure to boost the performance.
>
> Following are my setup:
> Java=Java 8
> HttpClient=HttpClient4
> Benchmark tool=jmeter
>
> testserver:~# uname -a
> Linux testserver 3.10.0-229.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Jan 29 18:37:38 EST 2015
> x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
>
>
> testserver:~# lscpu
> Architecture: x86_64
> CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit
> Byte Order: Little Endian
> CPU(s): 32
> On-line CPU(s) list: 0-31
> Thread(s) per core: 2
> Core(s) per socket: 8
> Socket(s): 2
> NUMA node(s): 2
> Vendor ID: GenuineIntel
> CPU family: 6
> Model: 63
> Model name: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2640 v3 @ 2.60GHz
> Stepping: 2
> CPU MHz: 2600.000
> BogoMIPS: 5210.53
> Virtualization: VT-x
> L1d cache: 32K
> L1i cache: 32K
> L2 cache: 256K
> L3 cache: 20480K
> NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0-7,16-23
> NUMA node1 CPU(s): 8-15,24-31
>
> testserver:~# vmstat -s
> 131730840 K total memory
> 5931052 K used memory
> 7126352 K active memory
> 5511616 K inactive memory
> 116069376 K free memory
> 20888 K buffer memory
> 9709520 K swap cache
> 11681788 K total swap
> 0 K used swap
> 11681788 K free swap
> 54069797 non-nice user cpu ticks
> 997 nice user cpu ticks
> 9712353 system cpu ticks
> 15112937897 idle cpu ticks
> 37101 IO-wait cpu ticks
> 73 IRQ cpu ticks
> 21245 softirq cpu ticks
> 0 stolen cpu ticks
> 8918100 pages paged in
> 267868897 pages paged out
> 0 pages swapped in
> 0 pages swapped out
> 4281536287 interrupts
> 4185543972 CPU context switches
> 1456296771 boot time
> 84815522 forks
>
>
>
> Tomcat 6 performance
>
> Linux 3.10.0-229.el7.x86_64 (testserver) 04/19/2016 _x86_64_
> (32 CPU)
> 05:36:33 PM CPU %user %nice %system %iowait %steal
> %idle
> 05:36:38 PM all 37.66 0.00 14.69 0.10 0.00
> 47.55
> 05:36:43 PM all 37.61 0.00 14.50 0.01 0.00
> 47.89
> 05:36:48 PM all 38.31 0.00 14.48 0.03 0.00
> 47.19
> 05:36:53 PM all 37.45 0.00 14.53 0.01 0.00
> 48.01
> 05:36:58 PM all 37.97 0.00 14.67 0.02 0.00
> 47.34
> 05:37:03 PM all 37.68 0.00 14.62 0.01 0.00
> 47.69
>
> Created the tree successfully using HTTPRequest.jmx
> Starting the test @ Wed Apr 13 17:34:58 CEST 2016 (1460561698701)
> Waiting for possible shutdown message on port 4445
> summary + 16181 in 1.3s = 12893.2/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 67
> Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 3 Started: 3 Finished: 0
> summary + 5187350 in 30s = 172911.7/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 31
> Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0
> summary = 5203531 in 31.3s = 166486.4/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 67
> Err: 0 (0.00%)
> summary + 5207210 in 30s = 173573.7/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 26
> Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0
> summary = 10410741 in 61.3s = 169957.4/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 67
> Err: 0 (0.00%)
> summary + 5039715 in 30s = 167990.5/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 13
> Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0
> summary = 15450456 in 91.3s = 169310.8/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 67
> Err: 0 (0.00%)
> summary + 5024196 in 30s = 167473.2/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 22
> Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0
> summary = 20474652 in 121s = 168856.1/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 67
> Err: 0 (0.00%)
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> tomcat 8
>
> Linux 3.10.0-229.el7.x86_64 (testserver) 04/19/2016 _x86_64_
> (32 CPU)
>
> 06:14:36 PM CPU %user %nice %system %iowait %steal
> %idle
> 06:14:41 PM all 24.10 0.00 9.39 0.01 0.00
> 66.51
> 06:14:46 PM all 24.62 0.00 9.25 0.00 0.00
> 66.13
> 06:14:51 PM all 24.66 0.00 9.12 0.01 0.00
> 66.22
> 06:14:56 PM all 23.96 0.00 9.36 0.08 0.00
> 66.60
> 06:15:01 PM all 24.78 0.00 9.52 0.01 0.00
> 65.69
> 06:15:06 PM all 23.86 0.00 9.24 0.03 0.00
> 66.87
>
>
>
>
>
> Created the tree successfully using HTTPRequest.jmx
> Starting the test @ Wed Apr 13 18:12:41 CEST 2016 (1460563961583)
> Waiting for possible shutdown message on port 4445
> summary + 1600892 in 18.4s = 87104.4/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 1040
> Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0
> summary + 3102671 in 30s = 103422.4/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 9
> Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0
> summary = 4703563 in 48.4s = 97223.2/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 1040
> Err: 0 (0.00%)
> summary + 3090174 in 30s = 103005.8/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 9
> Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0
> summary = 7793737 in 78.4s = 99436.5/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 1040
> Err: 0 (0.00%)
> summary + 3091476 in 30s = 103049.2/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 10
> Err: 0 (0.00%) Active: 24 Started: 24 Finished: 0
> summary = 10885213 in 108s = 100436.6/s Avg: 0 Min: 0 Max: 1040
> Err: 0 (0.00%)
>
> Regards,
> Ravi
>
>
What is strange is you are also getting significantly less CPU usage with
Tomcat 8. It is like there is a limitation which has nothing to do with the
capacity of your server. Like you have limited the number of
transactions/sec or something like that.