You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@hc.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2004/07/03 22:53:24 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29868] - DateParser code cleanup

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29868>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29868

DateParser code cleanup

becke@u.washington.edu changed:

------- Additional Comments From becke@u.washington.edu 2004-07-03 20:53 -------
Hello Christian,

Thank you for your interest in HttpClient.

The current lookup of date formats does contain some overhead, but me feeling is that it does not have
much effect on the overall performance of HttpClient. Please speak up if you've encoutered some
problems in this area.

The one problem I see with making this optimization is that it makes it impossible to modify the date
patterns once the DateParser class has been referenced. Though this probably wouldn't effect too
many people, IMO it outweighs any possible gain in performance.

I'm going to mark this BUG as "WONTFIX".

Thanks,

Mike

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-httpclient-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-httpclient-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org