Milestone release for wicket 2.0/1.3?

[Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>]

All,

Woudn't it be great if we could release our current progress as a
development build into the wild, and validate our progress on
licensing issues?

I think we could best address this by performing a milestone release,
which doesn't promise API stability, or bug-free operation, but will
be clear of licensing issues. This way we will be able to get our
licensing and packaging act together long before we actually go
beta/rc on our releases.

I am not sure where we stand with both 2.0 and 1.3 feature/bug wise,
but I would like to get the licensing issues done.

WDYT?

Martijn

-- 
<a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket">Vote</a>
for <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket">Wicket</a>
at the <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/">Best Stuff in
the World!</a>

Re: Milestone release for wicket 2.0/1.3?

[Frank Bille <fr...@gmail.com>]

I have just returned from holiday, and hope to get the last license header
crap done tomorrow. (I don't know if anyone have done anything, while I was
away. I'm trying to get through ~300 mails ;)

I might want some help with some rewriting so we can try to get the first
release right. I'll get back when I know some more.

Frank


On 12/8/06, Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > Woudn't it be great if we could release our current progress as a
> > development build into the wild, and validate our progress on
> > licensing issues?
> >
> > I think we could best address this by performing a milestone release,
> > which doesn't promise API stability, or bug-free operation, but will
> > be clear of licensing issues. This way we will be able to get our
> > licensing and packaging act together long before we actually go
> > beta/rc on our releases.
> >
> > I am not sure where we stand with both 2.0 and 1.3 feature/bug wise,
> > but I would like to get the licensing issues done.
> >
> > WDYT?
>
> I think you are spot on about getting out releases that are clear of
> licensing issues. This will be a major win for the project's incubation
> - in fact, I would say it is the next big thing on our list.
>
> Regards, Upayavira
>
>

Re: Milestone release for wicket 2.0/1.3?

[Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>]

Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> All,
> 
> Woudn't it be great if we could release our current progress as a
> development build into the wild, and validate our progress on
> licensing issues?
> 
> I think we could best address this by performing a milestone release,
> which doesn't promise API stability, or bug-free operation, but will
> be clear of licensing issues. This way we will be able to get our
> licensing and packaging act together long before we actually go
> beta/rc on our releases.
> 
> I am not sure where we stand with both 2.0 and 1.3 feature/bug wise,
> but I would like to get the licensing issues done.
> 
> WDYT?

I think you are spot on about getting out releases that are clear of 
licensing issues. This will be a major win for the project's incubation 
- in fact, I would say it is the next big thing on our list.

Regards, Upayavira

Re: Re: Milestone release for wicket 2.0/1.3?

[Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>]

On 12/7/06, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 12/8/06, Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > i think we can release an alpha1 of 2.0
> Fair enough, though the DatePicker needs to be moved out of extensions.


we havent already? was that only in 1.x?

> we need to create a roadmap for 1.3 on the wiki and mark what features are
> > already in and what are not
>
> JIRA can do this for us :-), or perhaps this will cloud the view when
> it is interspersed with bugs. +1 on wiki.


actually jira is a better idea. it wont be intersperesed cause you can
filter on issue type - in this case these should be improvements/new
additions not bugs.

i guess someone needs to go in and translate our wishlist into jira

-igor

Re: Re: Milestone release for wicket 2.0/1.3?

[Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>]

On 12/8/06, Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com> wrote:
> i think we can release an alpha1 of 2.0
Fair enough, though the DatePicker needs to be moved out of extensions.

> we need to create a roadmap for 1.3 on the wiki and mark what features are
> already in and what are not

JIRA can do this for us :-), or perhaps this will cloud the view when
it is interspersed with bugs. +1 on wiki.

Martijn

> On 12/7/06, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > Woudn't it be great if we could release our current progress as a
> > development build into the wild, and validate our progress on
> > licensing issues?
> >
> > I think we could best address this by performing a milestone release,
> > which doesn't promise API stability, or bug-free operation, but will
> > be clear of licensing issues. This way we will be able to get our
> > licensing and packaging act together long before we actually go
> > beta/rc on our releases.
> >
> > I am not sure where we stand with both 2.0 and 1.3 feature/bug wise,
> > but I would like to get the licensing issues done.
> >
> > WDYT?
> >
> > Martijn
> >
> > --
> > <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket">Vote</a>
> > for <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket
> > ">Wicket</a>
> > at the <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/">Best Stuff in
> > the World!</a>
> >
>
>


-- 
<a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket">Vote</a>
for <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket">Wicket</a>
at the <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/">Best Stuff in
the World!</a>

Re: Dojo-contrib

[Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com>]

> > Are there relased date for Wicket 1.3 and wicket 2.0

I would actually be confident enough calling 1.3 final right away
(1.3.0) or maybe do one release candidate first.

Eelco

Re: Dojo-contrib

[Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>]

On 12/9/06, Vincent Demay <vi...@anyware-tech.com> wrote:
> How can I update wicket-dojo web site to make an annoucement of
> the future jar release?

Typically we don't announce future releases, but actual releases ;-)

I think for this kind of stuff you could 'spam' the mailinglist, as
that gives you more exposure. And I think the new Wiki on wicket-stuff
can also give a good start to function as a CMS kind of thing.

> Are there relased date for Wicket 1.3 and wicket 2.0

No, we don't have a date for releasing them. We are contemplating a
first beta release for both 1.3 and 2.0, which I hope we can deliver
before the end of the year.

Martijn

-- 
Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket
Wicket 1.2.3 is as easy as 1-2-3. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org

Re: Dojo-contrib

[Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>]

Hmm, the last two guys working on wicket-contrib-dojo were students
(now employees) at our company. I'll ask them.

I think it is:
    maven site
or
    mvn site

if you upgraded to maven 2.

To deploy automatically you need to follow the maven instructions, and
sf.net instructions to ssh the files to the
/home/groups/w/wi/wicket-stuff/htdocs/wicket-contrib-dojo
directory. Typically this is already available in the project.xml and
project.properties for maven 1.

Martijn

On 12/9/06, Vincent Demay <vi...@anyware-tech.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Dojo-wicket-contrib is now full of new features. So I have now 2 questions :
> How can I update wicket-dojo web site to make an annoucement of the future
> jar release?
> Are there relased date for Wicket 1.3 and wicket 2.0
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Vincent
>
>


-- 
Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket
Wicket 1.2.3 is as easy as 1-2-3. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org

Dojo-contrib

[Vincent Demay <vi...@anyware-tech.com>]

Hi all,

Dojo-wicket-contrib is now full of new features. So I have now 2 questions :
How can I update wicket-dojo web site to make an annoucement of the future
jar release?
Are there relased date for Wicket 1.3 and wicket 2.0

Thanks

--
Vincent

Re: Milestone release for wicket 2.0/1.3?

[Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com>]

I agree with the sentiment, and I think a 1.3 release has more
priority than 2.0, but we can push out 2.0 as well... it's a beta
after all.

Eelco


On 12/8/06, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> hmm my thing is the other way around
>
> 2.0 i dont know (we need to do more there i guess and there are some open
> endings)
>
> 1.3 can be released now as beta if you ask me. We backported enough or are
> people
> also wanting other stuff?
> We can release 1.3 much earlier as 2.0 if you ask me.
>
> johan
>
>
> On 12/8/06, Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > i think we can release an alpha1 of 2.0
> >
> > i dont know about 1.3
> >
> > we need to create a roadmap for 1.3 on the wiki and mark what features are
> > already in and what are not
> >
> > -igor
> >
> >
> > On 12/7/06, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > All,
> > >
> > > Woudn't it be great if we could release our current progress as a
> > > development build into the wild, and validate our progress on
> > > licensing issues?
> > >
> > > I think we could best address this by performing a milestone release,
> > > which doesn't promise API stability, or bug-free operation, but will
> > > be clear of licensing issues. This way we will be able to get our
> > > licensing and packaging act together long before we actually go
> > > beta/rc on our releases.
> > >
> > > I am not sure where we stand with both 2.0 and 1.3 feature/bug wise,
> > > but I would like to get the licensing issues done.
> > >
> > > WDYT?
> > >
> > > Martijn
> > >
> > > --
> > > <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket">Vote</a>
> > > for <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket
> > > ">Wicket</a>
> > > at the <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/">Best Stuff in
> > > the World!</a>
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

Re: Milestone release for wicket 2.0/1.3?

[Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com>]

hmm my thing is the other way around

2.0 i dont know (we need to do more there i guess and there are some open
endings)

1.3 can be released now as beta if you ask me. We backported enough or are
people
also wanting other stuff?
We can release 1.3 much earlier as 2.0 if you ask me.

johan


On 12/8/06, Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> i think we can release an alpha1 of 2.0
>
> i dont know about 1.3
>
> we need to create a roadmap for 1.3 on the wiki and mark what features are
> already in and what are not
>
> -igor
>
>
> On 12/7/06, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > Woudn't it be great if we could release our current progress as a
> > development build into the wild, and validate our progress on
> > licensing issues?
> >
> > I think we could best address this by performing a milestone release,
> > which doesn't promise API stability, or bug-free operation, but will
> > be clear of licensing issues. This way we will be able to get our
> > licensing and packaging act together long before we actually go
> > beta/rc on our releases.
> >
> > I am not sure where we stand with both 2.0 and 1.3 feature/bug wise,
> > but I would like to get the licensing issues done.
> >
> > WDYT?
> >
> > Martijn
> >
> > --
> > <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket">Vote</a>
> > for <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket
> > ">Wicket</a>
> > at the <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/">Best Stuff in
> > the World!</a>
> >
>
>

Re: Milestone release for wicket 2.0/1.3?

[Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>]

i think we can release an alpha1 of 2.0

i dont know about 1.3

we need to create a roadmap for 1.3 on the wiki and mark what features are
already in and what are not

-igor


On 12/7/06, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Woudn't it be great if we could release our current progress as a
> development build into the wild, and validate our progress on
> licensing issues?
>
> I think we could best address this by performing a milestone release,
> which doesn't promise API stability, or bug-free operation, but will
> be clear of licensing issues. This way we will be able to get our
> licensing and packaging act together long before we actually go
> beta/rc on our releases.
>
> I am not sure where we stand with both 2.0 and 1.3 feature/bug wise,
> but I would like to get the licensing issues done.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Martijn
>
> --
> <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket">Vote</a>
> for <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket
> ">Wicket</a>
> at the <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/">Best Stuff in
> the World!</a>
>