You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@flink.apache.org by Flavio Pompermaier <po...@okkam.it> on 2020/03/03 11:19:20 UTC
Alink and Flink ML
Hi to all,
since Alink has been open sourced, is there any good reason to keep both
Flink ML and Alink?
From what I understood Alink already contains the best ML implementation
available for Flink..am I wrong?
Maybe it could make sense to replace the current Flink ML with that of
Alink..or is that impossible?
Cheers,
Flavio
Re: Alink and Flink ML
Posted by Flavio Pompermaier <po...@okkam.it>.
Thanks Marta for the clarification!
On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 3:26 PM Marta Paes Moreira <ma...@ververica.com>
wrote:
> Hi, Flavio.
>
> Indeed, Becket is the best person to answer this question, but as far as I
> understand the idea is that Alink will be contributed back to Flink in the
> form of a refactored Flink ML library (sitting on top of the Table API)
> [1]. You can follow the progress of these efforts by tracking FLIP-39 [2].
>
> [1] https://developpaper.com/why-is-flink-ai-worth-looking-forward-to/
> [2]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-39+Flink+ML+pipeline+and+ML+libs
>
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 2:02 PM Gary Yao <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Flavio,
>>
>> I am looping in Becket (cc'ed) who might be able to answer your question.
>>
>> Best,
>> Gary
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 12:19 PM Flavio Pompermaier <po...@okkam.it>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi to all,
>>> since Alink has been open sourced, is there any good reason to keep both
>>> Flink ML and Alink?
>>> From what I understood Alink already contains the best ML implementation
>>> available for Flink..am I wrong?
>>> Maybe it could make sense to replace the current Flink ML with that of
>>> Alink..or is that impossible?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Flavio
>>>
>>
Re: Alink and Flink ML
Posted by Marta Paes Moreira <ma...@ververica.com>.
Hi, Flavio.
Indeed, Becket is the best person to answer this question, but as far as I
understand the idea is that Alink will be contributed back to Flink in the
form of a refactored Flink ML library (sitting on top of the Table API)
[1]. You can follow the progress of these efforts by tracking FLIP-39 [2].
[1] https://developpaper.com/why-is-flink-ai-worth-looking-forward-to/
[2]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-39+Flink+ML+pipeline+and+ML+libs
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 2:02 PM Gary Yao <ga...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Flavio,
>
> I am looping in Becket (cc'ed) who might be able to answer your question.
>
> Best,
> Gary
>
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 12:19 PM Flavio Pompermaier <po...@okkam.it>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi to all,
>> since Alink has been open sourced, is there any good reason to keep both
>> Flink ML and Alink?
>> From what I understood Alink already contains the best ML implementation
>> available for Flink..am I wrong?
>> Maybe it could make sense to replace the current Flink ML with that of
>> Alink..or is that impossible?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Flavio
>>
>
Re: Alink and Flink ML
Posted by Gary Yao <ga...@apache.org>.
Hi Flavio,
I am looping in Becket (cc'ed) who might be able to answer your question.
Best,
Gary
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 12:19 PM Flavio Pompermaier <po...@okkam.it>
wrote:
> Hi to all,
> since Alink has been open sourced, is there any good reason to keep both
> Flink ML and Alink?
> From what I understood Alink already contains the best ML implementation
> available for Flink..am I wrong?
> Maybe it could make sense to replace the current Flink ML with that of
> Alink..or is that impossible?
>
> Cheers,
> Flavio
>