You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to reviews@iotdb.apache.org by "JackieTien97 (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2024/09/13 12:04:11 UTC
[PR] Fix bug while using NOT IN predicate for INT64 type [iotdb]
JackieTien97 opened a new pull request, #13515:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/13515
more details can be seen in https://jira.infra.timecho.com:8443/browse/TIMECHODB-975
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@iotdb.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Fix bug while using NOT IN predicate for INT64 type [iotdb]
Posted by "sonarcloud[bot] (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
sonarcloud[bot] commented on PR #13515:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/13515#issuecomment-2348804446
## [](https://sonarcloud.io/dashboard?id=apache_iotdb&pullRequest=13515) **Quality Gate passed**
Issues
 [1 New issue](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_iotdb&pullRequest=13515&issueStatuses=OPEN,CONFIRMED&sinceLeakPeriod=true)
 [0 Accepted issues](https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=apache_iotdb&pullRequest=13515&issueStatuses=ACCEPTED)
Measures
 [0 Security Hotspots](https://sonarcloud.io/project/security_hotspots?id=apache_iotdb&pullRequest=13515&issueStatuses=OPEN,CONFIRMED&sinceLeakPeriod=true)
 [0.0% Coverage on New Code](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_iotdb&pullRequest=13515&metric=new_coverage&view=list)
 [0.0% Duplication on New Code](https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=apache_iotdb&pullRequest=13515&metric=new_duplicated_lines_density&view=list)
[See analysis details on SonarCloud](https://sonarcloud.io/dashboard?id=apache_iotdb&pullRequest=13515)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@iotdb.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Fix bug while using NOT IN predicate for INT64 type [iotdb]
Posted by "codecov[bot] (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
codecov[bot] commented on PR #13515:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/13515#issuecomment-2348905607
## [Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/iotdb/pull/13515?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=h1&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache) Report
Attention: Patch coverage is `0%` with `7 lines` in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
> Project coverage is 41.72%. Comparing base [(`3f4fa64`)](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/iotdb/commit/3f4fa64c5a6a62d3dc77dc1838f9ab5729df77c9?dropdown=coverage&el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache) to head [(`7d067b3`)](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/iotdb/commit/7d067b36d26da481c713daf36c5134c676af9444?dropdown=coverage&el=desc&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache).
> Report is 2 commits behind head on master.
| [Files with missing lines](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/iotdb/pull/13515?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache) | Patch % | Lines |
|---|---|---|
| [...execution/relational/ColumnTransformerBuilder.java](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/iotdb/pull/13515?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=iotdb-core%2Fdatanode%2Fsrc%2Fmain%2Fjava%2Forg%2Fapache%2Fiotdb%2Fdb%2Fqueryengine%2Fexecution%2Frelational%2FColumnTransformerBuilder.java&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache#diff-aW90ZGItY29yZS9kYXRhbm9kZS9zcmMvbWFpbi9qYXZhL29yZy9hcGFjaGUvaW90ZGIvZGIvcXVlcnllbmdpbmUvZXhlY3V0aW9uL3JlbGF0aW9uYWwvQ29sdW1uVHJhbnNmb3JtZXJCdWlsZGVyLmphdmE=) | 0.00% | [7 Missing :warning: ](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/iotdb/pull/13515?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache) |
<details><summary>Additional details and impacted files</summary>
```diff
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #13515 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 41.71% 41.72%
Complexity 71 71
=========================================
Files 3973 3973
Lines 246684 246691 +7
Branches 29870 29872 +2
=========================================
+ Hits 102914 102930 +16
+ Misses 143770 143761 -9
```
</details>
[:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry](https://app.codecov.io/gh/apache/iotdb/pull/13515?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=continue&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache).
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? [Share it here](https://about.codecov.io/codecov-pr-comment-feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=apache).
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@iotdb.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Fix bug while using NOT IN predicate for INT64 type [iotdb]
Posted by "JackieTien97 (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
JackieTien97 merged PR #13515:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iotdb/pull/13515
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@iotdb.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org