You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by George Everitt <ge...@appliedrelevance.com> on 2008/01/23 19:38:14 UTC
Inverted Search Engine
Verity had a function called "profiler" which was essentially an
inverted search engine. Instead of evaluating a single query at a
time against a large corpus of documents, the profiler evaluated a
single document at a time against a large number of queries. This
kind of functionality is used for alert notifications, where a large
number of users can have their own queries and as documents are
indexed into the system, the queries are matched and some kind of
notification is made to the owner of the query (e-mail, SMS, etc).
Think "Google Alerts".
I'm wondering if anybody has implemented this kind of functionality
with Solr, and if so what strategy did you use? If you haven't
implemented something like that I would still be interested in ideas
on how to do it with Solr, or how to perhaps use Lucene to patch that
functionality into Solr? I have my own thoughts, but they are still a
bit primitive, and I'd like to throw it over the transom and see who
bites...
George Everitt
Applied Relevance LLC
Re: Inverted Search Engine
Posted by George Everitt <ge...@appliedrelevance.com>.
Wow, that's spooky.
Thanks for the heads up - looks like a good list to subscribe to as well
George Everitt
Applied Relevance LLC
geveritt@appliedrelevance.com
Tel: +1 (727) 641-4660
Fax: +1 (727) 233-0672
Skype: geverit4
AIM: geverit4@tampabay.rr.com
On Jan 23, 2008, at 2:30 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> As chance would have it, this was just discussed over on the lucene
> user's list. See the thread..
>
> Inverted search / Search on profilenetBest
> Erick
>
>
> On Jan 23, 2008 1:38 PM, George Everitt
> <ge...@appliedrelevance.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Verity had a function called "profiler" which was essentially an
>> inverted search engine. Instead of evaluating a single query at a
>> time against a large corpus of documents, the profiler evaluated a
>> single document at a time against a large number of queries. This
>> kind of functionality is used for alert notifications, where a large
>> number of users can have their own queries and as documents are
>> indexed into the system, the queries are matched and some kind of
>> notification is made to the owner of the query (e-mail, SMS, etc).
>> Think "Google Alerts".
>>
>> I'm wondering if anybody has implemented this kind of functionality
>> with Solr, and if so what strategy did you use? If you haven't
>> implemented something like that I would still be interested in ideas
>> on how to do it with Solr, or how to perhaps use Lucene to patch that
>> functionality into Solr? I have my own thoughts, but they are
>> still a
>> bit primitive, and I'd like to throw it over the transom and see who
>> bites...
>>
>> George Everitt
>> Applied Relevance LLC
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Re: Inverted Search Engine
Posted by Erick Erickson <er...@gmail.com>.
As chance would have it, this was just discussed over on the lucene
user's list. See the thread..
Inverted search / Search on profilenetBest
Erick
On Jan 23, 2008 1:38 PM, George Everitt <ge...@appliedrelevance.com>
wrote:
> Verity had a function called "profiler" which was essentially an
> inverted search engine. Instead of evaluating a single query at a
> time against a large corpus of documents, the profiler evaluated a
> single document at a time against a large number of queries. This
> kind of functionality is used for alert notifications, where a large
> number of users can have their own queries and as documents are
> indexed into the system, the queries are matched and some kind of
> notification is made to the owner of the query (e-mail, SMS, etc).
> Think "Google Alerts".
>
> I'm wondering if anybody has implemented this kind of functionality
> with Solr, and if so what strategy did you use? If you haven't
> implemented something like that I would still be interested in ideas
> on how to do it with Solr, or how to perhaps use Lucene to patch that
> functionality into Solr? I have my own thoughts, but they are still a
> bit primitive, and I'd like to throw it over the transom and see who
> bites...
>
> George Everitt
> Applied Relevance LLC
>
>
>
>
>
>