You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by "Rob Davies (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/06/20 00:47:00 UTC

[jira] Resolved: (AMQ-1244) DatabaseLocker implementation impedes database replication

     [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Rob Davies resolved AMQ-1244.
-----------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

Fixed by SVN revision 669733

> DatabaseLocker implementation impedes database replication
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AMQ-1244
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1244
>             Project: ActiveMQ
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Message Store
>    Affects Versions: 4.1.1
>         Environment: Latest ActiveMQ snapshot, Sybase ASE 12.5.x
>            Reporter: Marcos Sanz
>            Assignee: Rob Davies
>             Fix For: 5.2.0
>
>
> The current implementation of the JDBC Master/Slave feature makes one broker (the master) acquire a lock on a database object. In Sybase, this has been implemented with the command:
> LOCK TABLE foo IN EXCLUSIVE MODE
> This command can only be executed within a transaction, see:
> http://manuals.sybase.com/onlinebooks/group-as/asg1250e/sqlug/@Generic__BookTextView/54552;pt=54651
> This implies that for the whole lifespan of the ActiveMQ-process there is an open transaction in the RDBMS. This is a problem in a professional environment making use of a database replication server: The open transaction impedes that the transaction log in the active database is emptied, then the stable queue at the replication server won't be purged and will steadily grow up to infinitum. We have been able to observe this behaviour.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.