You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@directory.apache.org by el...@apache.org on 2013/04/08 09:35:02 UTC

svn commit: r1465553 - /directory/site/trunk/content/apacheds/advanced-ug/4.1.2-sasl-authn.mdtext

Author: elecharny
Date: Mon Apr  8 07:35:02 2013
New Revision: 1465553

URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1465553
Log:
formatting

Modified:
    directory/site/trunk/content/apacheds/advanced-ug/4.1.2-sasl-authn.mdtext

Modified: directory/site/trunk/content/apacheds/advanced-ug/4.1.2-sasl-authn.mdtext
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/directory/site/trunk/content/apacheds/advanced-ug/4.1.2-sasl-authn.mdtext?rev=1465553&r1=1465552&r2=1465553&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- directory/site/trunk/content/apacheds/advanced-ug/4.1.2-sasl-authn.mdtext (original)
+++ directory/site/trunk/content/apacheds/advanced-ug/4.1.2-sasl-authn.mdtext Mon Apr  8 07:35:02 2013
@@ -77,11 +77,11 @@ The SASL specifications are defined by a
     * [RFC 4505](http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4505.txt) : Anonymous Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL) Mechanism
     * [RFC 4616](http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4616.txt) : The PLAIN Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL) Mechanism
     * [RFC 4752](http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4752.txt) : The Kerberos V5 ("GSSAPI") Simple Authentication and Security Layer
-    (SASL) Mechanism
+        (SASL) Mechanism
     * [RFC 5801](http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5801.txt) : Using Generic Security Service Application Program Interface (GSS-API) 
-    Mechanisms in Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL): The GS2 Mechanism Family
+        Mechanisms in Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL): The GS2 Mechanism Family
     * [RFC 5802](http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5802.txt) : Salted Challenge Response Authentication Mechanism (SCRAM) SASL 
-    and GSS-API Mechanisms
+        and GSS-API Mechanisms
 
 Some other RFCs have been published, for each specific mechanisms, some of them are obsoleted by more recent RFCs :