You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to yarn-issues@hadoop.apache.org by "Xianghao Lu (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/08/07 02:22:00 UTC

[jira] [Comment Edited] (YARN-8609) NM oom because of large container statuses

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-8609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16571033#comment-16571033 ] 

Xianghao Lu edited comment on YARN-8609 at 8/7/18 2:21 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for your patience!
 I know what you say, and my hadoop version is 2.7.2 which don't contain the change in YARN-3998. Indeed, it would not take up too much memory if running with -YARN-3998.-
 However, for example, if the raw diagnostic is largeExceptionMessage + fixedString + fixedString + ... , all meaningful fixedString will be discarded when running with YARN-3998. So, if we do truncation in for loop, all kinds of diagnostic info will retain. This is what I want to say and it is a small improvement.


was (Author: luxianghao):
Thank you for your patience!
I know what you say, and my hadoop version is 2.7.2 which don't contain the change in YARN-3998. Indeed, it would not take up too many memory if running with -YARN-3998.-
However, for example, if the raw diagnostic is largeExceptionMessage + fixedString + fixedString + ... , all meaningful fixedString will be discarded. So, if we do truncation in for loop, all kinds of diagnostic info will retain. This is what I want to say and it is a small improvement.

> NM oom because of large container statuses
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-8609
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-8609
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: nodemanager
>            Reporter: Xianghao Lu
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: YARN-8609.001.patch, contain_status.jpg, oom.jpeg
>
>
> Sometimes, NodeManger will send large container statuses to ResourceManager when NodeManger start with recovering, as a result , NodeManger will be failed to start because of oom.
>  In my case, the large container statuses size is 135M, which contain 11 container statuses, and I find the diagnostics of 5 containers are very large(27M), so, I truncate the container diagnostics as the patch.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org